A Risk-Based Approach to the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience in National Dental Centre Singapore.

The emergence of a highly infectious coronavirus strain, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to a major global public health emergency. The increasing number of infected cases and fatalities worldwide forced several countries into lockdown in a bid to control virus transmission. The practice of dentistry is considered high-risk due to the generation of aerosols associated with most dental procedures, and healthcare professionals must take appropriate precautions whilst working in this challenging environment. This review aims to provide an overview on transmission routes and shares a risk-based approach to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a specialty tertiary center. Risk assessment and mitigation focussed on staff and patient safety, adopting a wide safety margin, and responding dynamically to the level of risk at the workplace. As the severity of the pandemic depends on many still-unknown factors and shows little sign of abating, the routine practice of dentistry will continue to be disrupted in the near future. We describe a color-coded framework to maximize safety and to minimize disease spread. Areas covered include healthcare team management, personal protective equipment, clinical work, and dental education. Guidelines in each category change with the corresponding severity of the situation, and we believe it will be useful for the safer practice of dentistry in this current climate and can be modified for future similar disease outbreaks.

Somatosensory profile of a patient with mixed connective tissue disease and Sjögren syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The authors report the case of a patient with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and Sjögren syndrome, showing signs and symptoms of bilateral trigeminal neuropathy and aseptic meningitis. The patient was assessed by means of quantitative sensory testing (QST) according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain standards, in both the gingiva and forearm, and the results were compared with those of healthy control participants. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 27-year-old woman, who had received a diagnosis of MCTD and Sjögren syndrome from a rheumatologist, sought treatment at an orofacial pain clinic for bilateral electriclike pain in the maxillary anterior gingiva, eyelids, and cheeks. QST indicated allodynia and hyperalgesia in response to mechanical and thermal stimuli in both her gingiva and forearm, and cold hyperalgesia in her forearm only. She had been prescribed an oral corticosteroid (prednisone, 7 milligrams per day) by the rheumatologist, and was given lidocaine gel and systemic pregabalin (400 mg/d) at the clinic. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The cause of trigeminal neuropathy in MCTD and Sjögren syndrome (SS) is unknown. The QST data in this case showed that the somatosensory disturbance severity was higher in the gingiva than in the forearm, suggesting that the trigeminal nerve may be more susceptible than other parts of the nervous system in patients with MCTD. If reproducible in future studies, the finding of greater hypersensitivity in the gingiva than in the forearm may provide an opportunity for dentists to play a role in the detection, diagnosis, or both of MCTD and SS. Dentists must be sufficiently familiar with MCTD and SS to include them in their differential diagnoses and should consider performing simple neurosensory testing such as via intraoral cotton swab or pinprick test.

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mimicking Peri-Implantitis.

INTRODUCTION: Peri-implantitis is inflammation and alveolar bone loss around a dental implant. Published case reports have described squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) development around dental implants. CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old female presented with two small fistulas on the alveolar ridge of missing tooth #18. The mucosa around the fistulas appeared normal otherwise, with no hyperplasia, erythema, or keratotic changes. The patient had a 14-year history of recurrent erythroleukoplakia (with microscopic dysplasia) on the left tongue that had been managed by surgical removal (scalpel and carbon dioxide laser), biopsies, and close follow-up. She had no other medical conditions. She reported that she had an implant placed to replace tooth #18 4 years ago that had been removed without flap reflection, curettage, or biopsy 1 year previously as a result of peri-implantitis. Periapical radiographs showed that the peri-implant radiolucency in the region of tooth #18 was unchanged in dimensions from the time of implant removal 1 year ago. Curettage and biopsy of the area were performed and showed the presence of a well-differentiated SCC. CONCLUSIONS: This is a case of peri-implant SCC development in a patient at high risk for oral SCC. The carcinoma was present within the alveolar defect in the area of a failed implant that had been removed 1 year previously. The overlying surface mucosa did not show the clinical changes typically seen in carcinoma. This case and others demonstrate the importance of periodic oral and radiographic examination after implant placement. Although rare, neoplasia must be considered in the evaluation of peri-implant pathology.

Clinical predictors of oral leukoplakia recurrence following CO2 laser vaporization.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether risk of early leukoplakia recurrence (within 3 months) following carbon dioxide (CO2) laser removal varies by clinical characteristics including lesion size, site and accessibility of margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients with oral leukoplakia who had their first CO2 laser surgery for removal of oral leukoplakia between 2005 and 2010 at the UCSF oral medicine clinic. Twenty-six patients with 32 separate lesions met the eligibility criteria after a clinic database search was followed by review of clinical notes and biopsy reports from existing patient charts. Data analysis included computation of summary statistics, and logistic regression analyses to evaluate recurrence of leukoplakia by clinical characteristics of the lesions. RESULTS: Patient data and the characteristics of lesions were evaluated as possible predictors of early recurrence following laser removal; these included age, sex, duration, size, appearance and histopathology of the lesion. The only one that reached statistical significance was poor accessibility of the margins of the lesion (vs. good accessibility, OR = 24.57 (95% CI: 1.59-16.68), p = 0.016); the probability for trend for good, questionable, and poor accessibility was 0.0028. This finding remained significant after controlling for age, sex, duration and size of lesion. Four out of five lesions with poor accessibility showed recurrence at 3 months. Of these, three involved the gingiva and one the lateral tongue. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified poor accessibility of the lesion margins as a predictor for early recurrence of leukoplakia following laser removal. Other variables evaluated did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to lack of power.