Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Radiography (Lond) ; 28(2): 353-359, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953726

ABSTRACT

Patient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control (AEC) systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.


Subject(s)
Radiology , Child , Consensus , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Radiology/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
2.
Phys Med ; 54: 42-48, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30337009

ABSTRACT

Interventional cardiac procedures may be associated with high patient doses and therefore require special attention to protect the patients from radiation injuries such as skin erythema, cardiovascular tissue reactions or radiation-induced cancer. In this study, patient exposure data is collected from 13 countries (37 clinics and nearly 50 interventional rooms) and for 10 different procedures. Dose data was collected from a total of 14,922 interventional cardiology procedures. Based on these data European diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for air kerma-area product are suggested for coronary angiography (CA, DRL = 35 Gy cm2), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 85 Gy cm2), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI, 130 Gy cm2), electrophysiological procedures (12 Gy cm2) and pacemaker implantations. Pacemaker implantations were further divided into single-chamber (2.5 Gy cm2) and dual chamber (3.5 Gy cm2) procedures and implantations of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (18 Gy cm2). Results show that relatively new techniques such as TAVI and treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO) often produce relatively high doses, and thus emphasises the need for use of an optimization tool such as DRL to assist in reducing patient exposure. The generic DRL presented here facilitate comparison of patient exposure in interventional cardiology.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/standards , Europe , Reference Values
3.
Health Phys ; 115(4): 474-489, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30148813

ABSTRACT

A regulatory authority for radiation safety should continuously evaluate and improve the national safety framework, in line with current requirements and standards. In this context, the Greek Atomic Energy Commission initiated a series of concerted actions. The radiation dose to the population due to public and medical exposures was assessed. The assessment of dose due to public exposure was based on measurements of radon concentrations in dwellings, radionuclide concentrations in environmental samples, and air dose rates; the assessment of dose due to medical exposure was based on dose measurements for typical examinations or procedures and data on their frequency. The mean effective dose to a member of the population was found to be 4.5 mSv (1.8 mSv and 2.7 mSv from medical and public exposures, respectively). Regarding occupational exposure, aircrew dose assessment, eye lens monitoring, and the national dose registry were significantly improved. With respect to artificial tanning (sun beds), the ultraviolet radiation produced was assessed and the practices followed were observed. Results demonstrated exceedance of the 0.3 W m erythema effective irradiance limit set in European Union standards by 63.5% of the sun beds measured, along with general noncompliance with standards. An overarching activity was the upgrade of the Greek Atomic Energy Commission information system in order to collect and disseminate radiation data electronically, launch a networking strategy for interaction with stakeholders, and facilitate the process of regulatory control. In response to the above findings, regulatory actions have been initiated.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Sunbathing , Construction Materials , Drinking Water , Greece , Humans , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Radioisotopes , Radon/analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultraviolet Rays , Water Pollutants, Radioactive
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 163(3): 319-24, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24891405

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to present a national survey that was performed in Greece for the establishment of national Dose Reference Levels (DRLs) for seven common adult Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. Volumetric computed tomography dose index and dose-length product values were collected from the post-data page of 65 'modern' systems that incorporate tube current modulation. Moreover, phantom dose measurements on 26 'older' systems were performed. Finally, the effective dose to the patient from a typical acquisition during these examinations was estimated. The suggested national DRLs are generally comparable with respective published values from similar European studies, with the exception of sinuses CT, which presents significantly higher values. This fact, along with the large variation of the systems' dose values that were observed even for scanners of the same type, indicates a need for further patient protection optimisation without compromising the clinical outcome.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/statistics & numerical data , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/standards , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Exposure/standards , Whole-Body Counting/statistics & numerical data , Whole-Body Counting/standards , Adult , Body Burden , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis/standards , Greece , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Male , Phantoms, Imaging/standards , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , Reference Values
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 147(1-2): 202-5, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21821614

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of 52 full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems checked by the Greek Atomic Energy Commission with respect to dose and image quality. Entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was measured and average glandular dose (AGD) was calculated according to the European protocol on dosimetry in mammography. The exposures were performed using the clinical protocol of each laboratory. The image quality was assessed by the total score of resolved phantom structures incorporated in an American College of Radiology accreditation phantom. The mean ESAK values for FFD and CR systems were 4.59 ± 1.93 and 5.0 ± 1.78 mGy, respectively, whereas the AGD yielded a mean value of 1.06 ± 0.36 mGy for the FFD and 1.04 ± 0.35 mGy for the CR systems. Considering image quality, FFD systems indicated a mean total score of 13.04 ± 0.89, whereas CR systems a mean total score of 11.54 ± 1.06.


Subject(s)
Breast/radiation effects , Mammography , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Breast/pathology , Female , Greece , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage
6.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 147(1-2): 129-32, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21743078

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate image quality of various computed tomography (CT) scanners installed in Greece, as well as to investigate patient doses from common CT examinations. An image quality survey was performed in 44 CT scanners countrywide. The imaging performance of the systems was evaluated by measurements of certain parameters, such as image noise, spatial uniformity, high- and low-contrast resolution and slice thickness accuracy. Moreover, preliminary results of patient dose survey are presented. Concerning image quality, 80 % of the scanners were found to be in compliance with the national legislation and relative international guidelines for all the examined parameters. Weighted CT dose index and dose-length product values for chest and abdomen routine examinations were generally below the dose reference levels (DRLs) suggested by the European Commission. However, some scanners were found to deliver significantly higher doses than the suggested DRL for head routine examinations. Finally, differences in the performance among scanners of the same type and similar age were observed, pointing out the importance of frequent calibration, routine quality control and proper maintenance.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Protection/standards , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed/standards , Greece , Humans , Quality Control , Reference Values
7.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 144(1-4): 482-6, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21044993

ABSTRACT

The present study is focused on the personnel doses during several types of interventional radiology procedures. Apart from the use of the official whole body dosemeters (thermoluminescence dosemeter type), measurements were performed to the extremities and the eyes using thermoluminescent loose pellets. The mean doses per kerma area product were calculated for the monitored anatomic regions and for the most frequent types of procedures. Higher dose values were measured during therapeutic procedures, especially embolisations. The maximum recorded doses during a single procedure were 1.8 mSv to the finger (nephrostomy), 2.1 mSv to the wrist (liver chemoembolisation), 0.6 mSv to the leg (brain embolisation) and 2.4 mSv to the eye (brain embolisation). The annual doses estimated for the operator with the highest workload according to the measurements and the system's log book were 90.4 mSv to the finger, 107.9 mSv to the wrist, 21.6 mSv to the leg and 49.3 mSv to the eye. Finally, the effect of the beam angulation (i.e. projection) and shielding equipment on the personnel doses was evaluated. The measurements were performed within the framework of the ORAMED (Optimization of RAdiation Protection for MEDical staff) project.


Subject(s)
Extremities/radiation effects , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiology, Interventional , Radiometry/instrumentation , Angiography/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Lead , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Protective Clothing , Protective Devices , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiometry/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Workforce
8.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 129(4): 419-25, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17971345

ABSTRACT

This study presents the results from a survey conducted by the Greek Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), during the period 1998-2003, in 530 public and private owned fluoroscopic X-ray systems in Greece. Certain operational parameters for conventional and remote control systems were assessed, according to a quality control protocol developed by GAEC on the basis of the current literature. Public (91.5%) and private (81.5%) owned fluoroscopic units exhibit high-contrast resolution values over 1 lp mm(-1). Moreover, 88.5 and 87.1% of the fluoroscopic units installed in the public and private sector, respectively, present Maximum Patient Entrance Kerma Rate values lower than 100 mGy min(-1). Additionally, 68.3% of the units assessed were found to perform within the acceptance limits. Finally, the third quartile of the Entrance Surface Dose Rate distribution was estimated according to the Dose Reference Level definition and found equal to 35 mGy min(-1).


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Radiation Dosage , Greece , Humans , Private Sector , Public Sector , Quality Control , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
9.
Phys Med ; 23(3-4): 107-14, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18023226

ABSTRACT

This study presents the results of the on-site inspections performed by the Greek Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC) on conventional X-ray systems, both in public and private medical radiology departments. A part of the inspection concerns the assessment of important radiographic parameters obtained according to a specified quality control protocol and the comparison of the measured parameter values with the corresponding acceptance limits. A total number of 1011 radiographic systems were inspected by the GAEC during the period 1998-2004, with 63.4% of them being privately owned. Analysis of 8 different operational parameters is carried out providing information on the overall performance, as well as on each parameter of the inspected X-ray systems. Tube voltage reproducibility values show the highest percentage of acceptability (98.9%, 99.5% for private and public owned radiographic systems respectively), while linearity of radiation output for private systems (72.5%) and time accuracy for public ones (72.7%) show the worst results. The comparison of the results for the private sector to those of a similar study carried out during the period 1995-1997 indicates a substantial improvement in X-ray systems performance. Higher level of improvement shows exposure time accuracy (12.2% percentile increase) and linearity of radiation output (12.5% percentile increase). Nevertheless, the situation can be further optimized if maintenance and quality control of the radiographic systems are carried out on a more regular basis.


Subject(s)
Radiography/methods , Radiography/standards , Advisory Committees/legislation & jurisprudence , Greece , Humans , Private Sector , Public Sector , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...