Telemedicine Versus Traditional In-Person Consultations: Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Rates.

Introduction: Data on patient satisfaction with the provision of genetic consultations using telemedicine are limited, especially those involving children. We compared patient satisfaction rates with telemedicine services versus traditional in-person encounters. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted between January and June 2020. Questionnaires were distributed online to 1,672 consecutive patients who had received genetic counseling at our Genetics Institute in the clinical fields of adult and pediatric genetics, oncogenetics, and prenatal genetics, through in-person and/or telemedicine consultation. We used Likert scale with scores of 4-5 representing "satisfied"-"very satisfied" and 1-2 representing "very unsatisfied"-"unsatisfied." Results: The response rate was 27.3% (400 adults and 57 children <18 years), including 330 who had received in-person consultations (72.2%), 80 telemedicine consultations (17.5%), and 47 both consultations (10.3%). Mean satisfactory scores of 4-5 were reported by 82.1% in the in-person group versus 82.5% in the telemedicine group (p = 0.88). Mean scores of 1-2 were reported by 6.3% in the in-person group versus 11.2% in the telemedicine group (p = 0.31). No pediatric telemedicine group patient (n 12 = ) gave scores of 1-2 compared with 2/33 (6%) patients who had in-person pediatric consultations (p = 0.62). Most responders who had been counseled through telemedicine (n = 127, 84%) indicated willingness to use genetic services through telemedicine again. Conclusions: Users of genetic counseling through telemedicine, especially in the pediatric age group, were very satisfied at rates comparable to those of in-person consultations. Future research should evaluate patient compliance and views according to session type, information provided (e.g., diagnostic vs. negative results), and its nature (good vs. bad news).

Upgrading an intronic TMEM67 variant of unknown significance to likely pathogenic through RNA studies and community data sharing.

FETAL PHENOTYPE: A couple of Ashkenazi Jewish descent was referred for an early anatomy scan at 14 + 2 weeks of gestation following a previous pregnancy termination due to posterior encephalocele and enlarged kidneys. The index pregnancy was also positive for several fetal abnormalities, including enlarged kidneys with cystic dysplasia and abnormal cerebellar morphology highly suggestive of Joubert syndrome. GENETIC DIAGNOSTIC TEST PERFORMED, RESULT, AND INTERPRETATION: Trio exome sequencing revealed compound heterozygosity for variants in the TMEM67 gene: a known pathogenic maternally inherited variant found in trans with a paternal intronic variant of unknown significance. RNA analysis revealed that the intronic variant creates a cryptic acceptor splice site in intron 12, leading to the insertion of 22 bp and causing a frameshift with a premature stop codon. This analysis enabled the reclassification of the intronic variant to likely pathogenic. IMPLICATIONS AND NOVELTY: This information empowered the couple to make informed reproductive choices and opt for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for future pregnancies.

Improving renal phenotype and evolving extra-renal features of 17q12 deletion encompassing the HNF1B gene.

BACKGROUND: HNF1B deletion/intragenic mutations are the most commonly identified genetic cause of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) suggested by fetal ultrasound findings such as: parenchymal hyperechogenicity, overt cystic changes or gross morphological urinary system (UT) abnormalities. The postnatal evolution of these 17q12 deletions encompassing the HNF1B gene-associated findings has not been assessed in depth. METHODS: In this observational study, we present postnatal follow-up findings in 5 of 6 cases (one pregnancy was terminated on parental request) of fetal-onset cystic/hyperechogenic kidneys eventually diagnosed with 17q12 microdeletion encompassing the HNF1B gene between 2009 and 2017. RESULTS: Complete normalization of kidney parenchymal abnormalities and of depressed neonatal renal function was observed in 4/5 and 5/5 patients within 2-4.9 years and 1.5-8 months, respectively. All 5 patients had preserved normal renal function at 3-11 years of follow-up. The evolving later-onset renal features included: hypomagnesemia, hyperuricemia, urinary tract infection (UTI), and bilateral grade 3-4 vesicoureteral reflux and bladder diverticula in 3, 3, 2, and 1 patient, respectively. HNF1B gene deletion-associated extra-renal manifestations with delayed presentation were global developmental delay/autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), rolandic-type seizures, overweight, and borderline fasting hyperglycemia observed in 1-2 patients each. Family history was positive for small-size or asymptomatic cystic kidneys with normal function, diabetes mellitus, seizures, and mental/psychiatric problems in 3/6 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal-onset HNF1B deletion-associated kidneys' parenchymal abnormalities confirmed postnatally with initially depressed renal function might undergo complete resolution within several years and few months, respectively. However, later-onset urinary tract, metabolic, and neurodevelopmental features of this mutation might appear over years. Therefore, genetic molecular evaluation/diagnosis and continuous follow-up for evolving features are mandatory in affected children.

Whole-exome sequencing in fetuses with central nervous system abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: We describe our experience with whole-exome sequencing (WES) in fetuses with central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities following a normal chromosomal microarray result. METHODS: During the study period (2014-2017) 7 cases (9 fetuses) with prenatally diagnosed CNS abnormality, whose chromosomal microarray analysis was negative, were offered whole-exome sequencing analysis. RESULTS: A pathogenic or a likely pathogenic variant was found in 5 cases including a previously described, likely pathogenic de novo TUBA1A variant (Case #1); a previously described homozygous VRK1 variant (Case #2); an X-linked ARX variant (Case #3); a likely pathogenic heterozygous variant in the TUBB3 gene (Case #5). Finally, in two fetuses of the same couple (Case #6), a compound heterozygous state was detected, consisting of the NPHP1 gene deletion and a sequence variant of uncertain significance. Two additional cases had normal WES results. CONCLUSION: Whole-exome sequencing may improve prenatal diagnosis in fetuses with CNS abnormalities.

Microscopic chromosome Xp distal deletions--a challenging issue in prenatal genetic counseling.

OBJECTIVE: A prenatal diagnosis of chromosome X short arm deletions may present a challenge in prenatal genetic counseling. We present clinical and molecular data of carriers of Xp distal deletions. METHODS: We assessed prenatal and postnatal phenotypes of individuals from three families with large Xp distal deletions and from a fourth family with a small Xp distal deletion. The work-up included karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, and assessment of the X inactivation pattern. RESULTS: Five out of eight women with large deletions had a short stature (<3rd percentile). Subjects from one family had developmental and emotional problems. All female carriers with small deletions had markedly short stature, whereas the men had mildly short stature. Chromosomal microarray analysis revealed 11.7-19.3 Mb deletions in three families and a small ~1 Mb deletion in the fourth. The pseudoautosomal region 1 of the X chromosome was deleted in two families with large deletions. X inactivation was skewed in all tested cases with large deletions. CONCLUSION: Xp distal deletions are mainly associated with short stature. Skewing of the abnormal X chromosome may attenuate the phenotype in cases with large deletions. We suggest that prenatal evaluation in such cases should include sonographic follow-up and assessment of the X inactivation pattern.

Familial clustering of site-specific cancer risks associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 lead to significantly increased risks of breast and ovarian cancer. We used epidemiologic methods to evaluate the relative risks of breast cancer vs. ovarian cancer among women of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry with inherited mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. The cancer of a family's index case (i.e., breast cancer vs. ovarian cancer) was significantly associated with site-specific risks of cancer in relatives known to carry mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Specifically, breast cancer risks were higher among relatives of breast cancer index cases compared with relatives of ovarian cancer index cases [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.0, P < 0.001 for BRCA1 carriers and HR = 4.8, P = 0.017 for BRCA2 carriers], and ovarian cancer risks were higher among relatives of ovarian cancer index cases compared with relatives of breast cancer index cases (HR = 7.2, P = 0.001 for BRCA1 carriers and HR = 15.8, P = 0.018 for BRCA2 carriers). Breast and ovarian cancer risks also increased with more recent year of birth. For each later decade of birth, risk increased 1.2-fold (P = 0.03). Effects of cancer site of the index case and of birth cohort were independent. These results suggest that both genetic and nongenetic factors modify cancer risks among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, and that genetic modifiers and other familial factors may influence risk specifically for either breast or ovarian cancer.