ABSTRACT
Background: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is promoted as a marker reflecting the antitumoral inflammatory response. Herein, we aim to assess whether NLR at the time of diagnosis can predict response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in a matched cohort of rectal cancer patients. Methods: This is a case control study on rectal cancer patients who underwent standard oncological treatment and had NLR sampled at each stage. ROC curve was used to establish the cut off value of NLR at diagnosis. Two groups (high and low NLR) were compared. Kaplan Meier overall and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis was done comparatively between two groups of patients: low and high NLR. Pearson and Log Rank tests were used to establish statistical significance. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and all variables were compared again on the matched subgroups. Results: One hundred patients were included and 54 were compared again after PSM. NLR at diagnosis did not correlate with tumor regression grade (p=0.77). High NLR at diagnosis (NLR 2.58) was not found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival (p=0.096) or DFS (p=0.128). Similar results were achieved after PSM, except when stage III subgroups were compared, where higher NLR was associated with worse DFS (p=0.04), while results for OS were borderline (p=0.05). Conclusions: Overall, a pretherapeutic high NLR ( 2.58) was not found to predict survival or response do neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer. However, a higher NLR may be associated with worse outcomes in advanced colorectal cancer.
Subject(s)
Neutrophils , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Case-Control Studies , Propensity Score , Treatment Outcome , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , LymphocytesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Studies evaluated the effect of several diets on inflammatory markers in IBD patients. Nevertheless, the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted this review to evaluate the effectiveness of dietary interventions on inflammatory markers in IBD. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic literature search strategy using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted in March 2023 and evaluated inflammatory markers included C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and fecal calprotectin (FC), as well as disease severity scores. We included full-text articles that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. To evaluate the included studies, we used the NHLBI quality evaluation tools. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included in our qualitative synthesis. Elemental and polymeric diets showed similar efficacy in reducing Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) and CRP levels. On the other hand, most studies evaluating the effects of omega 3 fatty acids reported no significant improvement. Moreover, protein supplementation was not seen to improve ESR or CRP levels. Except for improvements in FC levels with IgG4-guided exclusion diet in CD patients with elevated CDAI levels, restrictive diets were successful in controlling functional abdominal symptoms but did not appear to have an impact on inflammation in most studies. Furthermore, disease severity scores, CRP, ESR, and FC levels did not significantly change when eating a high-fiber, low-refined-carb, low-fat diet. CONCLUSIONS: Diet plays a vital role in managing IBD by impacting the inflammatory response. Among the interventions studied, enteral nutrition showed the most promising results, improving patients' inflammatory status. Restrictive diets effectively managed symptoms and clinical remission but had limited impact on inflammatory markers. Supplementing the diet with fatty acids, omega 3, or proteins did not definitively improve patients' condition or inflammation.
