Evaluation of a superabsorbent wound dressing, patient and clinician perspective: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the fluid management capabilities of a superabsorbent wound dressing (Zetuvit Plus Silicone), with secondary objectives related to parameters that support whether the dressing enables undisturbed healing. METHOD: This study was an open labelled non-comparative study. Patients included in the study were selected by the clinical investigator(s) according to whether the patient required a dressing for the management of moderately to highly exuding wounds. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in the study. Results related to the primary objective demonstrated that the superabsorbent wound dressing was able to absorb all levels of exudate across the range (low to high). At each assessment time point these results show that in 98% of assessments the superabsorbent dressing was rated as 'very good' (91%) or 'good' (7%) at exudate management. Secondary objectives relating to wound bed preparation, healing and management of pain were also positive. Additionally, at the end of each patient treatment, the dressing's fluid management capabilities were rated overall as 'excellent' (100% of cases). There was little pain associated with the wound or at dressing change throughout the study and its flexibility/conformability allowed for comfort and patient satisfaction aligned with increased quality of life. Additionally, inclusion of a silicone adhesive layer allowed painless and atraumatic removal of the dressing, increasing patient comfort, both during wear and at dressing removal, and supported the description of enabling undisturbed wound healing. CONCLUSION: The superabsorbent wound dressing achieved the primary objective relating to wound exudate management in all the assessments undertaken in this study. In addition, the silicone interface allowed for undisturbed healing as evidenced by little or no adherence of the dressing to underlying tissue, preventing damage to periwound skin. Overall, the superabsorbent wound dressing with the addition of the silicone interface could offer advantages over other superabsorbent polymer dressings (that might adhere to the wound surface) or silicone wound dressings (that might not have the absorbent properties of this type of dressing).

An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients.

OBJECTIVE: This open, non-comparative, multi-centre investigation examines the use of a new superabsorbent polymer (SAP) wound dressing used for exudate management (in medium-to-high exuding wounds) in a patient population with a variety of wound types. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the fluid management capabilities of the dressing. METHOD: Both acute and chronic wounds with moderate-to-high exudate production levels were assessed (over a period of two weeks) as requiring exudate management, with a SAP dressing, Zetuvit Plus (designated Resposorb Super in Europe), as part of their normal treatment regimen. Clinicians recorded a subjective assessment of exudate management and its impact on periwound skin conditions. In addition, wound bed preparation, healing trajectory and pain level reduction were monitored to give an insight into the clinical implications of using this dressing. Data was also collected from clinicians and patients on clinical performance of the dressing. RESULTS: The SAP dressing achieved ratings of 'very good'/'good' (83% and 13%, respectively) in relation to its wound exudate handling properties. The dressing supported improved wound healing, reduced damage to and enhanced the status of the periwound skin. Pain levels were reduced and, as a consequence, patient reported outcomes were improved. Patients commented that the exudate handling capabilities of the dressing, its conformability and comfort allowed them to resume a semblance of normality in their life. All participating clinicians indicated that they would continue to use the SAP dressing. A sub-population cost analysis has highlighted that, when compared to alternative (historical) exudate management treatments, the SAP dressing was less expensive. The cost reduction arises from data that shows product use and frequency of dressing change (that impacts on nurse time) are both reduced. For the 10 patients evaluated, total costs were £2,491 and £1,312 before and during use, respectively; a saving of £1,179.00 (47%). CONCLUSION: The SAP dressing was well tolerated and shown to be effective in the management of moderate-to-high exudate. Consequently, the dressing supported improved healing, and reduced damage to periwound skin, leading to lower pain levels. Overall, both the patients and clinicians rated the SAP highly.