Should All Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Be Managed by Cardiothoracic Fellowship-Trained Anesthesiologists?

OBJECTIVES: To identify differences in practice patterns and outcomes related to the induction of general anesthesia for patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) performed by anesthesiologists who have completed a cardiothoracic fellowship (CTA group) vs those who have not (non-CTA group). DESIGN: Retrospective study with propensity score matching. SETTING: Operating room. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients with PH undergoing general anesthesia requiring intubation at a single academic center over 5 years. INTERVENTIONS: Patient baseline characteristics, peri-induction management variables, post-induction mean arterial pressure (MAP), and other outcomes were compared between CTA and non-CTA groups. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: Following propensity scoring matching, 402 patients were included in the final model, 100 in the CTA group and 302 in the non-CTA group. Also following matching, only cases of mild to moderate PH without right ventricular dysfunction remained in the analysis. Matched groups were overall statistically similar with respect to baseline characteristics; however, there was a greater incidence of higher ASA class (P = .025) and cardiology and thoracic procedures (P < .001) being managed by the CTA group. No statistical differences were identified in practice patterns or outcomes related to the induction of anesthesia between groups, except for longer hospital length of stay in the CTA group (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide early evidence to suggest the induction of general anesthesia of patients with non-severe PH disease can be comparably managed by either anesthesiologists with or without a cardiothoracic fellowship. However, these findings should be confirmed in a prospective study.

Predictors of Post-induction Hypotension for Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

Purpose The purpose is to identify predictors of post-induction hypotension (PIH) during general anesthesia in a population of patients with varying degrees of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study of perioperative data obtained via electronic health records from patients with PH undergoing surgery over a five-year period. Baseline patient characteristics, peri-induction management variables, and pre-induction mean arterial pressure (MAP) were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests, Pearson's chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for PIH. We further assessed the relationship between PH and PIH using propensity score matching. Primary outcomes include a percent decrease in post-induction blood pressure as well as a post-induction nadir with a threshold of 55 mm Hg. Results Eight hundred fifty-seven patients in the cohort stratified by severity of PH reveal that advanced age (p < 0.001), higher BMI (P = 0.002), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = 0.001), and renal and cardiac comorbidities (P < 0.001) are associated with PH severity. None of our tested parameters were significantly predictive for PIH in patients with PH. Right heart failure was found to be weakly and non-significantly predictive of PIH in patients with PH (P = 0.052, odds ratio [OR] = 1.116). Diabetes (P = 0.007, OR = 0.919) and maintenance of spontaneous ventilation (P = 0.012, OR = 0.925) were associated with decreased rates of PIH. Conclusion Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia in patients with PH is a serious problem, yet statistically significant risk factors were not identified. History of diabetes and preservation of spontaneous ventilation had a significant but weak effect of decreasing rates of PIH. This pilot study was limited by retrospective design and warrants further analysis with a prospective cohort.