More Than a Bruise: Two Cases of Morel-Lavallée Lesions in Active Duty Soldiers.

Soft tissue injuries are common in the military, generally producing simple hematomas without the need for intensive evaluation and management. In certain situations, a shearing effect between fascial planes whereby a disruption of the vasculature and lymphatic systems creates a "closed degloving injury" is more generally referred to as a Morel-Lavallée Lesion (MLL). With a consistent pool of blood, lymph, and pieces of soft tissue, an M7LL can cause significant poor cosmesis, chronic pain, and risk secondary infection if left undetected and untreated. Proper diagnosis can be made through the effective use of ultrasound and, if detected early enough, through conservative measures to include needle aspiration and compression sleeves. Prior cases describe chronic MLLs existing for extended periods of time, in some cases years, requiring operative intervention, and in some cases poor outcomes. We present two cases of active duty soldiers presenting with seemingly innocuous injuries found on closer evaluation to have MLL, treated in one case with needle aspiration and compression, in the other with operative management.

Comparison of DripAssist to Traditional Method for Achieving Rate Infusions by U.S. Army Medics.

Literature finds improper intravenous (IV) infusion rates as the most common cause of medication administration errors (MAE). Calculating drip rates and manipulating roller clamps while counting drops within the drip chamber to manage IV infusions - known as the traditional method (TM) - increases the likelihood of IV MAEs compared to electronic infusion pumps. The DripAssist, a novel in-line device, allows users to monitor and adjust infusion rates without calculating rates or counting drops. We conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study with a convenience sample of U.S. Army medics initiating infusion rates using the DripAssist and the TM. Investigators randomized participants to start with the TM or DripAssist and achieve three specific infusions using an in vitro model. The primary outcome was the time to achieve the desired infusion rate measured in seconds. Secondary outcomes included drip rate accuracy and volume infused over one hour. End user feedback included method confidence on a 100-point Bandura scale and appraisal using a five-point Likert item. Twenty-two medics demonstrated faster time to achieve infusion rates with the DripAssist over TM (median 146.5 seconds vs. 207.5 seconds, p = .003). A sequence effect noted faster time to achieve desired infusion rates with the TM after completing infusions with DripAssist (p = .033). The DripAssist demonstrated significantly improved accuracy for drip rate and volume administered over one hour compared to TM (median rate error: 5% versus 46%, p <.001; median volume percentage error: 26.5% versus 65%, p <.001). The DripAssist had significantly higher user confidence (median 80 vs. 47.5, p <.001) and was perceived as easier to use (median 4 vs. 2, p = <.001) and more likely to be learned, remembered, and performed by a medic (median 5 vs. 3, p <.001). Most participants (90%) preferred the DripAssist for establishing a rate-specific infusion. The DripAssist demonstrated significantly faster time to achieve infusion rates, improved accuracy, and increased user confidence. Sequence effects may confound time data. We recommend further studies of the DripAssist by prehospital medical personnel in more austere environments.

Impact of a Novel Biplane User Interface on Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access Performance: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal methods of employing ultrasound to enhance vascular access. A novel user interface which dynamically displays transverse (short) and longitudinal (long) planes simultaneously was developed to optimize ultrasound-guided vascular access. This study aimed to assess the impact of this novel biplane axis technology on central venous access performance. METHODS: Eighteen volunteer emergency medicine resident physicians and physician assistants were recruited from a single center to participate in this prospective, randomized crossover study. Following a brief instructional video, participants were randomized to perform ultrasound-guided vascular access using either short-axis or biplane axis approaches first, followed by the opposite technique following a brief washout period. Time to cannulation was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included success rate, posterior wall and arterial puncture rates, time to scout, number of attempts, number of needle redirections, participant cannulization and visualization confidence, and interface preference. RESULTS: Short-axis imaged approach was associated with a significantly shorter time to cannulation (34.9 seconds versus 17.6, p is less than 0.001) and time to scout (30 versus 49 seconds, p is equal to 0.008) when compared to biplaneaxis imaging approach. No significant differences were noted when comparing first pass success, number of attempts, number of redirections, and posterior wall and arterial wall puncture. Participants' cannulation/visualization confidence and axis preference both favored the short-axis imaging approach. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to assess the clinical value of novel biplane axis ultrasound imaging in the performance of ultrasound-guided procedures.

FAST Performance in a Stationary versus In-Motion Military Ambulance Utilizing Handheld Ultrasound: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: On-scene prehospital conditions and patient instability may warrant a during-transport ultrasound (US) exam. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of ambulance turbulence on the performance of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) with a handheld US device. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial in which participants were randomized to perform a FAST in either a stationary or an in-motion military ambulance. Participants were physicians and physician assistants (PAs) with previous FAST training. All exams were performed on an US phantom model. The primary outcome was FAST completion time, reported as a mean, in seconds. Secondary outcomes included image acquisition score (range of 0-24, reported as a mean), diagnostic accuracy (reported as sensitivity and specificity), and a post-participation survey with five-item Likert-type scales. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants performed 27 FASTs, 14 in the stationary ambulance and 13 in the in-motion ambulance. All participants obtained the four requisite views of the FAST. A significant difference was detected in image acquisition scores in favor of the stationary ambulance group (19.4 versus 16.7 [95% CI for difference, 0.9-4.4]; P <.01). Significant differences in survey items between groups were related to obtaining and maintaining US images and the exam conditions. There was not a difference in FAST completion time between groups (98.5 seconds versus 78.7 seconds [95% CI for difference, -13.5 seconds to 53.1 seconds]; P = .23). Sensitivity and specificity of FAST in the stationary ambulance was 85.7% (95% CI, 67.3%-96.0%) and 96.4% (95% CI, 81.7%-99.9%) versus 96.2% (95% CI, 80.4%-99.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 86.8%-100.0%) in the in-motion ambulance group (P = .21). CONCLUSION: Vehicular motion did not affect FAST completion time and diagnostic accuracy; however, it did reduce FAST image acquisition scores. The results suggest timely and diagnostically accurate FASTs may be completed by experienced sonographers during moderate levels of ambulance turbulence. Further investigation assessing the utility and limitations of newer handheld US devices in various prehospital conditions is warranted.