Comparison of Measurement and Prognostic Power of SUV Between High-Definition and Standard PET Imaging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the measurement and prognostic ability of the SUVmax of whole-body tumors (SUVmaxwb) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, comparing high-definition (HD) PET imaging with standard-definition (SD) PET imaging. Methods: The study included 242 consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT from April 2018 to January 2021. Two imaging techniques were used: HD PET (using ordered-subsets expectation maximization with point-spread function modeling and time-of-flight techniques and smaller voxels) and SD PET (with ordered-subsets expectation maximization and time-of-flight techniques). SUVmaxwb was determined by measuring all the tumor lesions in the whole body, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated using the background SUVmean of various body parts. Results: The patient cohort had an average age of 68.3 y, with 59.1% being female. During a median follow-up of 29.6 mo, 83 deaths occurred. SUVmaxwb was significantly higher in HD PET than SD PET, with respective medians of 17.4 and 11.8. The TBR of 1,125 tumoral lesions was also higher in HD PET. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that SUVmaxwb from both HD and SD PET were significantly associated with overall survival. However, after adjusting for TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stage, only SUVmaxwb from SD PET remained significantly associated with survival. Conclusion: HD PET imaging in NSCLC patients yields higher SUVmaxwb and TBR, enhancing tumor visibility. Despite this, its prognostic value is less significant than SD PET after adjusting clinical TNM stage. Thus, consideration should be given to using HD PET reconstruction to increase tumor visibility, and SD PET is recommended for NSCLC patient prognostication and therapeutic evaluation, as well as for the classification of lung nodules.

Lack of Cancer Recurrence Data in Large Databases: A National Survey of Hospital Cancer Registries.

BACKGROUND: Cancer recurrence information is not routinely collected by the US cancer registries. Prior research suggests hospital characteristics, staff qualifications, and chart access may be contributing factors but this has not been explored nationally. This study aimed to understand issues underlying poor collection of recurrence information and to identify targets for improvement. METHODS: A survey was sent to Commission on Cancer hospitals to investigate reasons for variations in recurrence data collection, examine resources allocated, and assess coding variability. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Eight hundred and forty-five of 1417 surveys to Commission on Cancer hospitals were analyzed. Sixty-nine percent reported annually examining charts for recurrence ("investigating" hospitals). They more likely had experienced registrars (91% versus 84%, P < 0.05), integrated electronic medical records (75% versus 68%, P < 0.05) and chart access to in-network hospitals (80% versus 73%, P < 0.05). Thirty-seven percent reported ability to follow-up using medical records on <50% of patients. Reasons for noncollection included inability to accurately collect (37%), limited resources (44%), and low priority (18%). Odds of being an investigating hospital increased with the percentage of patients who could be followed up with medical records (90%-100% OR = 6.72). There were minimal differences among hospitals in registry caseload and resources. 79.5% reported that without prior recurrence documentation, they would code the patient as not having a recurrence, 8.8% would change all recurrence variables to "unknown," and 7.2% would leave them blank. CONCLUSIONS: Those tasked with collecting recurrence information report significant barriers concerning data access, data quality, adequate resources, and coding variability. A unified effort is needed to improve collection.

Prognostic value of quantitative PET/CT in patients with a nonsmall cell lung cancer and another primary cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The staging and management of patients with newly diagnosed nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the setting of recently diagnosed other (metachronous or synchronous) primary cancer are challenging. This retrospective cohort study was carried out to test our hypothesis that baseline 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose (F-FDG) PET/CT parameters, including whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB), total lesion glycolysis (TLGWB), and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmaxWB), are associated with the overall survival (OS) of such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 110 NSCLC patients (52 men and 58 women, aged 68.6±7.8 years) with other primary malignant cancers who had baseline F-FDG PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. MTVWB, TLGWB, and SUVmaxWB were measured. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test and Cox regression models were used to assess the association of OS with F-FDG PET/CT parameters and clinical risk factors. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression models showed significant associations of OS with ln(MTVWB), ln(TLGWB), ln(SUVmaxWB), TNM stage, and treatment type (surgery vs. no treatment). Multivariable Cox regression models showed a significant relationship of OS with ln(MTVWB) [hazard ratio (HR)=1.368, P=0.001], ln(TLGWB) (HR=1.313, P<0.001), and ln(SUVmaxWB) (HR=1.739, P=0.006), adjusted for age, treatment type, tumor histology, and TNM stage. The TNM stage was not associated significantly with OS when MTVWB, TLGWB, or SUVmaxWB were included in the multivariable models. CONCLUSION: MTVWB, TLGWB, and SUVmaxWB from baseline F-FDG PET/CT are associated individually with OS of patients with both NSCLC and other primary malignant tumors independent of age, treatment type, tumor histology, and TNM stage.

Comprehensive genetic testing identifies targetable genomic alterations in most patients with non-small cell lung cancer, specifically adenocarcinoma, single institute investigation.

This study reviews extensive genetic analysis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in order to: describe how targetable mutation genes interrelate with the genes identified as variants of unknown significance; assess the percentage of patients with a potentially targetable genetic alterations; evaluate the percentage of patients who had concurrent alterations, previously considered to be mutually exclusive; and characterize the molecular subset of KRAS. Thoracic Oncology Research Program Databases at the University of Chicago provided patient demographics, pathology, and results of genetic testing. 364 patients including 289 adenocarcinoma underwent genotype testing by various platforms such as FoundationOne, Caris Molecular Intelligence, and Response Genetics Inc. For the entire adenocarcinoma cohort, 25% of patients were African Americans; 90% of KRAS mutations were detected in smokers, including current and former smokers; 46% of EGFR and 61% of ALK alterations were detected in never smokers. 99.4% of patients, whose samples were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), had genetic alterations identified with an average of 10.8 alterations/tumor throughout different tumor subtypes. However, mutations were not mutually exclusive. NGS in this study identified potentially targetable genetic alterations in the majority of patients tested, detected concurrent alterations and provided information on variants of unknown significance at this time but potentially targetable in the future.

A new PET/CT volumetric prognostic index for non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB) has been shown of prognostic value for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) beyond that of TNM stage, age, gender, performance status, and treatment selection. The current TNM staging system does not incorporate tumor volumetric information. We propose a new PET/CT volumetric prognostic (PVP) index that combines the prognostic value of MTVWB and TNM stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on 328 consecutive NSCLC patients with a baseline PET/CT scan before treatment, from which MTVWB was measured semi-automatically, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for ln(MTVWB) and TNM stage from a Cox proportional hazard regression model that consisted of only ln(MTVWB) and TNM stage as prognostic variables of overall survival. We used the regression coefficients, which gave rise to the HRs, as weights to formulate the PET/CT volumetric prognostic (PVP) index. We also compared the prognostic value of the PVP index against that of TNM stage alone and ln(MTVWB) alone with univariate and multivariate survival analyses and C-statistics. RESULTS: Univariate analysis C-statistic for the PVP index (C=0.71) was statistically significantly greater than those for TNM stage alone (C=0.67, p<0.01) and for ln(MTVWB) alone (C=0.69, p=0.033). Multivariate analyses showed that the PVP index yielded significantly greater discriminatory power (C=0.74) than similar models based on either TNM stage (C=0.72, p<0.01) or ln(MTVWB) (C=0.73, p<0.01). Lower values of the PVP index were associated with significantly better overall survival (adjusted HR=2.70, 95%CI [2.16, 3.37]). CONCLUSION: The PVP index provides a practical means for clinicians to combine the prognostic value of MTVWB and TNM stage and offers significantly better prognostic accuracy for overall survival of NSCLC patients than the current TNM staging system or metabolic tumor burden alone.

The quest for population-level cancer recurrence data; current deficiencies and targets for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Cancer recurrence is a critical outcome in cancer care. However, population-level recurrence information is currently unavailable. Tumor registries provide an opportunity to generate this information, but require major reform. Our objectives were to (1) determine causes for variability in collection of recurrence, and (2) identify targets for intervention. METHODS: On-site interviews and observations of tumor registry follow-up procedures were conducted at Commission on Cancer (CoC) accredited hospitals. Information regarding registry resources (caseload, staffing, chart availability), follow-up methods and perceived causes for difficulty in obtaining recurrence information was obtained. RESULTS: Seven NCI/academic, 5 comprehensive community and 2 community centers agreed to participate. Hospitals were inconsistent in their investigation of cancer recurrence, resulting in underreporting of rates of recurrence. Hospital characteristics, registry staffing, staff qualifications and medical chart access influenced follow-up practices. Coding standards and definitions for recurrence were suboptimal, resulting in hospital variability of recurrence reporting. Finally, inability to identify cases lost to follow-up in collected data prevents accurate analysis of recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Tumor registries collect varying degrees of recurrence information and provide the underpinnings to capture population-level cancer recurrence data. Targets for intervention are listed, and provide a roadmap to obtain this critical information in cancer care.

Relationship between Overall Survival of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Whole-Body Metabolic Tumor Burden Seen on Postsurgical Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Images.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that whole-body metabolic tumor burden (MTBWB) on postsurgical fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) images in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with their overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for obtaining informed consent. One hundred forty-two patients with NSCLC (69 men, 73 women; median age, 67.7 years) who underwent postsurgical FDG PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. The whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB), whole-body total lesion glycolysis (TLGWB), and whole-body maximum standardized uptake value (SUVWBmax) were measured. OS served as the primary end point of the study. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to assess the association between PET/CT markers and OS. RESULTS: The interobserver variability was low, as demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficients higher than 0.94 for SUVWBmax, MTVWB, and TLGWB. When compared with those with negative postsurgical FDG PET/CT findings, a significant decrease of OS was found in patients with the presence of FDG-avid tumor on the basis of both a log-rank test (P = .001) and a univariate Cox model (hazard ratio = 2.805, P = .001). In patients with FDG-avid tumor, there was a significant association between OS and ln MTVWB (P < .001), ln TLGWB (P < .001), and ln SUVWBmax (P < .010) in either univariate or multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient age, sex, TNM restage, and therapy after postsurgical PET/CT studies. The OS differences between the groups dichotomized by the median value of MTVWB (11.54 mL, P = .004), TLGWB (32.38 mL, P < .001), or SUVWBmax (4.93, P = .023) were significant. CONCLUSION: MTBWB and tumor maximum standardized uptake at postsurgical FDG PET/CT are related to the patient's OS in NSCLC, independent of age, sex, TNM restaging, and therapy after postsurgical PET/CT studies.

A study of recurrence and death from papillary thyroid cancer with 27 years of median follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Although recurrence and death can occur in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) several years after being diagnosed, the necessary duration of follow-up for these patients remains unclear. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of 269 patients with PTC. Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to identify risk factors for recurrence and death. Risk predictors included age, sex, radiation exposure history, extent of operation, radioactive iodine treatment, follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC), extrathyroidal invasion, multifocality, TNM status, and stage. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 years. Of 269 patients, 180 (66%) were female, and 196 (73%) were ≤45 years of age. Recurrence and cancer-specific death rates were 28% and 9%, respectively. Time to recurrence (±SD) was 8.1 (± 8.3) years and to cancer-specific death was 9.0 (± 11.0) years; however, 11% of recurrences and 17% of deaths occurred after 20 years. Risk factors for recurrence were older age, FVPTC, T4 tumors, cervical lymph node involvement, metastases, and stage ≥ 4a. Predictors of death from PTC were older age, metastases, and stage ≥ 3. CONCLUSION: Both recurrences and death from PTC can occur more than 30 years after being treated, thus lifelong follow-up of patients with PTC is necessary.

Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT measured with metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), independent of Union Internationale Contra la Cancrum (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage, in comparison with that of standardized uptake value (SUV) in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 169 consecutive nonsurgical patients (78 men, 91 women, median age of 68 years) with newly diagnosed NSCLC who had pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans. The (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed in accordance with National Cancer Institute guidelines. The MTV of whole-body tumor (MTV(WB)), of primary tumor (MTV(T)), of nodal metastases (MTV(N)), and of distant metastases (MTV(M)); the TLG of whole-body tumor (TLG(WB)), of primary tumor (TLG(T)), of nodal metastases (TLG(N)), and of distant metastases (TLG(M)); the SUV(max) of whole-body tumor (SUV(maxWB)), of primary tumor (SUV(maxT)), of nodal metastases (SUV(maxN)), and of distant metastases (SUV(maxM)) as well as the SUV(mean) of whole-body tumor (SUV(meanWB)), of primary tumor (SUV(meanT)), of nodal metastases (SUV(meanN)), and of distant metastases (SUV(meanM)) were measured with the PETedge tool on a MIMvista workstation with manual adjustment. The median follow-up among survivors was 35 months from the PET/CT (range 2-82 months). Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, and C-statistics. RESULTS: There were a total of 139 deaths during follow-up. Median overall survival (OS) was 10.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.0-13.2 months]. The MTV was statistically associated with OS. The hazard ratios (HR) for 1 unit increase of ln(MTV(WB)), √(MTV(T)), √(MTV(N)), and √(MTV(M)) before/after adjusting for stage were: 1.47/1.43 (p < 0.001/<0.001), 1.06/1.05 (p < 0.001/<0.001), 1.11/1.10 (p < 0.001/<0.001), and 1.04/1.03 (p = 0.007/0.043), respectively. TLG had statistically significant associations with OS with the HRs for 1 unit increase in ln(TLG(WB)), √(TLG(T)), √(TLG(N)), and √(TLG(M)) before/after adjusting for stage being 1.36/1.33 (p < 0.001/<0.001), 1.02/1.02 (p = 0.001/0.002), 1.05/1.04 (p < 0.001/<0.001), and 1.02/1.02 (p = 0.003/0.024), respectively. The ln(SUV(maxWB)) and √(SUV(maxN)) were statistically associated with OS with the corresponding HRs for a 1 unit increase before/after adjusting for stage being 1.46/1.43 (p = 0.013/0.024) and 1.22/1.16 (p = 0.002/0.040). The √(SUV(meanN)) was statistically associated with OS before and after adjusting for stage with HRs for a 1 unit increase of 1.32 (p < 0.001) and 1.24 (p = 0.015), respectively. The √(SUV(meanM)) and √(SUV(maxM)) were statistically associated with OS before adjusting for stage with HRs for a 1 unit increase of 1.26 (p = 0.017) and 1.18 (p = 0.007), respectively, but not after adjusting for stage (p = 0.127 and 0.056). There was no statistically significant association between OS and √(SUV(maxT)), ln(SUV(meanWB)), or √(SUV(meanT)). There was low interobserver variability among three radiologists with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) greater than 0.94 for SUV(maxWB), ln(MTV(WB)), and ln(TLG(WB)). Interobserver variability was higher for SUV(meanWB) with an ICC of 0.806. CONCLUSION: Baseline metabolic tumor burdens at the level of whole-body tumor, primary tumor, nodal metastasis, and distant metastasis as measured with MTV and TLG on FDG PET are prognostic measures independent of clinical stage with low inter-observer variability and may be used to further stratify nonsurgical patients with NSCLC. This study also suggests MTV and TLG are better prognostic measures than SUV(max) and SUV(mean). These results will need to be validated in larger cohorts in a prospective study.