Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurobiol Learn Mem ; 151: 10-17, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29555349

ABSTRACT

Targeting memories during sleep opens powerful and innovative ways to influence the mind. We used targeted memory reactivation (TMR), which to date has been shown to strengthen learned episodes, to instead induce forgetting (TMR-Forget). Participants were first trained to associate the act of forgetting with an auditory forget tone. In a second, separate, task they learned object-sound-location pairings. Shortly thereafter, some of the object sounds were played during slow wave sleep, paired with the forget tone to induce forgetting. One week later, participants demonstrated lower recall of reactivated versus non-reactivated objects and impaired recognition memory and lowered confidence for the spatial location of the reactivated objects they failed to spontaneously recall. The ability to target specific episodic memories for forgetting during sleep has implications for developing novel therapeutic techniques for psychological disorders such as PTSD and phobias.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Memory , Sleep , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Recall , Recognition, Psychology , Spatial Memory , Young Adult
2.
Neurobiol Learn Mem ; 142(Pt A): 154-161, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28274825

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate the process by which new experiences reactivate and potentially update old memories. Such memory reconsolidation appears dependent on the extent to which current experience deviates from what is predicted by the reactivated memory (i.e. prediction error). If prediction error is low, the reactivated memory is likely to be updated with new information. If it is high, however, a new, separate, memory is more likely to be formed. The temporal parietal junction TPJ has been shown across a broad range of content areas (attention, social cognition, decision making and episodic memory) to be sensitive to the degree to which current information violates the observer's expectations - in other words, prediction error. In the current paper, we investigate whether the level of TPJ activation during encoding predicts if the encoded information will be used to form a new memory or update a previous memory. We find that high TPJ activation predicts new memory formation. In a secondary analysis, we examine whether reactivation strength - which we assume leads to a strong memory-based prediction - mediates the likelihood that a given individual will use new information to form a new memory rather than update a previous memory. Individuals who strongly reactivate previous memories are less likely to update them than individuals who weakly reactivate them. We interpret this outcome as indicating that strong predictions lead to high prediction error, which favors new memory formation rather than updating of a previous memory.


Subject(s)
Memory Consolidation/physiology , Parietal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Parietal Lobe/physiology , Photic Stimulation , Temporal Lobe/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...