Predictors of Success of Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patients.

Purpose: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PR) are an important part of the comprehensive treatment of patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. Patients respond individually to PR. The aim of this study is to identify potential predictors of success of PR to recognise patients who benefit most and to uncover possible reasons for poor response to PR. Patients and Methods: We included 121 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who completed our 4-week inpatient PR without any exacerbations of disease during PR that could potentially affect PR outcomes. Improvement in distance of ≥30 m on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) after PR was chosen as a primary marker of physical success. Ninety-one patients achieved improvement of ≥30 m on the 6MWT and were thus considered good responders, and 30 patients were poor responders with improvement in the distance of <30 m on the 6MWT. Results: We compared baseline clinical characteristics, medication, lung function, physical capacity, body composition, and laboratory blood tests between groups of good and poor responders. The most prominent differences between groups were associated with differences in baseline body composition and erythrocyte-related parameters. Good responders had significantly lower body water content (p = 0.042) and higher body weight (p = 0.036), body fat content (p = 0.049), dry lean mass (p = 0.021), haemoglobin levels (p = 0.040), erythrocyte count (p = 0.017), haematocrit (p = 0.030) and iron level (p = 0.028). Conclusion: A more muscular body composition and a higher ability to transport oxygen from the blood to the muscles could be beneficial for the outcome of PR.

Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: A 6-country, cluster-randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) supports individuals to define, discuss, and record goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care. Despite being internationally recommended, randomised clinical trials of ACP in patients with advanced cancer are scarce. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To test the implementation of ACP in patients with advanced cancer, we conducted a cluster-randomised trial in 23 hospitals across Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Netherlands, Slovenia, and United Kingdom in 2015-2018. Patients with advanced lung (stage III/IV) or colorectal (stage IV) cancer, WHO performance status 0-3, and at least 3 months life expectancy were eligible. The ACTION Respecting Choices ACP intervention as offered to patients in the intervention arm included scripted ACP conversations between patients, family members, and certified facilitators; standardised leaflets; and standardised advance directives. Control patients received care as usual. Main outcome measures were quality of life (operationalised as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] emotional functioning) and symptoms. Secondary outcomes were coping, patient satisfaction, shared decision-making, patient involvement in decision-making, inclusion of advance directives (ADs) in hospital files, and use of hospital care. In all, 1,117 patients were included (442 intervention; 675 control), and 809 (72%) completed the 12-week questionnaire. Patients' age ranged from 18 to 91 years, with a mean of 66; 39% were female. The mean number of ACP conversations per patient was 1.3. Fidelity was 86%. Sixteen percent of patients found ACP conversations distressing. Mean change in patients' quality of life did not differ between intervention and control groups (T-score -1.8 versus -0.8, p = 0.59), nor did changes in symptoms, coping, patient satisfaction, and shared decision-making. Specialist palliative care (37% versus 27%, p = 0.002) and AD inclusion in hospital files (10% versus 3%, p < 0.001) were more likely in the intervention group. A key limitation of the study is that recruitment rates were lower in intervention than in control hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that quality of life effects were not different between patients who had ACP conversations and those who received usual care. The increased use of specialist palliative care and AD inclusion in hospital files of intervention patients is meaningful and requires further study. Our findings suggest that alternative approaches to support patient-centred end-of-life care in this population are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN63110516.

Advance care planning--a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study.

BACKGROUND: Awareness of preferences regarding medical care should be a central component of the care of patients with advanced cancer. Open communication can facilitate this but can occur in an ad hoc or variable manner. Advance care planning (ACP) is a formalized process of communication between patients, relatives and professional caregivers about patients' values and care preferences. It raises awareness of the need to anticipate possible future deterioration of health. ACP has the potential to improve current and future healthcare decision-making, provide patients with a sense of control, and improve their quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: We will study the effects of the ACP program Respecting Choices on the quality of life of patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer. In a phase III multicenter cluster randomised controlled trial, 22 hospitals in 6 countries will be randomised. In the intervention sites, patients will be offered interviews with a trained facilitator. In the control sites, patients will receive care as usual. In total, 1360 patients will be included. All participating patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at inclusion, and again after 2.5 and 4.5 months. If a patient dies within a year after inclusion, a relative will be asked to complete a questionnaire on end-of-life care. Use of medical care will be assessed by checking medical files. The primary endpoint is patients' quality of life at 2.5 months post-inclusion. Secondary endpoints are the extent to which care as received is aligned with patients' preferences, patients' evaluation of decision-making processes, quality of end-of-life care and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. A complementary qualitative study will be carried out to explore the lived experience of engagement with the Respecting Choices program from the perspectives of patients, their Personal Representatives, healthcare providers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: Transferring the concept of ACP from care of the elderly to patients with advanced cancer, who on average are younger and retain their mental capacity for a larger part of their disease trajectory, is an important next step in an era of increased focus on patient centered healthcare and shared decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN63110516. Date of registration: 10/3/2014.

Caring for caregivers: a right way to do it?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The support of family caregivers in palliative care is critical and well recognized; yet the fact that caregivers still face significant unmet needs highlights a considerable gap in addressing this issue. Current themes on the caregiving experience in palliative care are presented. RECENT FINDINGS: The recent literature suggests a shift towards a broader understanding of the caregiving experience in palliative care in terms of better integration of caregivers of patients with noncancer illnesses into palliative care, improved continuity of care among different settings and better integration of guidelines and evidence into practice. Several risk groups and factors of caregiving in palliative care have been identified. The literature review emphasizes a public health approach as an important step in addressing the caregivers' burden. While 'the right way' of supporting caregivers is still to be established, consideration of caregivers' roles as co-providers and co-recipients of care offers numerous implications for research and clinical practice. SUMMARY: This review demonstrates the need for the development of specific strategies aimed at supporting informal caregivers in caring for their loved ones in different settings and periods of advanced life-threatening illnesses. Open issues in searching for 'the right way' to care for caregivers in palliative care are presented.

Spiritual needs assessments and measurements.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses the developments in spiritual needs assessments and measurements in end-of-life care. The review considers spiritual needs assessments from the perspective of palliative care patients, their families and caregivers, and healthcare professionals. RECENT FINDINGS: Spiritual needs assessments vary significantly along the dimensions of content and domains. These needs assessments have the potential to deepen our insight and to identify those who are most at risk for spiritual distress, but few are practical and simple enough to use in everyday clinical practice, and for the research, few are cross-culturally validated. Spirituality is a complex construct, although 'relatedness' was recognized as a core dimension of spirituality in addition to existential beliefs and values related to meaning and purpose. Little is known about the spiritual needs in elderly patients, in the cognitively impaired, and during the dying process. The spiritual needs of family caregivers need more support and attention. SUMMARY: Spirituality is considered to be one of the patient's vital signs and should be routinely screened and assessed. Research in spiritual care should be ongoing for all palliative care patients as well as for those with specific needs such as mental, neurological, or cognitive impairment. There is also a knowledge gap concerning how spiritual needs change during the progression of the disease trajectory. More work must be done on the spiritual concerns of family caregivers.