ABSTRACT
Intramedullary beaming is a surgical option for medial column arthrodesis; however, disagreement exists about which beam design should be used. This computational study aimed to analyze the effects that common beam parameters have on medial column arthrodesis using a set of 5 subject-specific finite element models. A full-factorial design of experiments was conducted with 3 factors: implant stiffness (114 GPa Titanium vs 193 GPa Stainless Steel), threaded portion (25 mm Partially Threaded vs 130 mm Fully Threaded) and cannulation (Cannulated vs Solid). Increasing implant stiffness, threaded portion and using a solid beam all significantly increased medial column stiffness from 13.9 to 20.0 N/mm (p < .001), 15.2 to 18.8 N/mm (p = .001) and 13.6 to 20.4 N/mm (p < .001), respectively. Moreover, simultaneously increasing all 3 factors resulted in a 172% increase in medial column stiffness, as well as a 33% decrease in maximum von-Mises stress, 70% decrease in strain energy and 44% decrease in the average normal force in the implant during bending; all of which were significant. There was no significant increase in contact area in any of the joints, but there was a significant decrease in micromotion in each joint, ranging from 63% to 66%. Based on the parameters tested, a stainless steel, fully threaded (design that can apply compression), solid intramedullary device would produce the most stable construct for medial column arthrodesis under ideal conditions. Future studies simulating neuropathic conditions are needed before clinical use; however, this study shows the potential benefits of altering the implant design.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Stainless Steel , Arthrodesis/methods , Diabetic Foot/surgery , Finite Element Analysis , Foot , HumansABSTRACT
Intramedullary beaming is commonly used for medial column arthrodesis to prevent or correct rocker-bottom deformities; however, the biomechanics of these reconstructions have not been rigorously studied. Customized FE models of intramedullary beaming of the medial column were developed and compared to a previous cadaveric study, which resulted in a strong correlation in medial column stiffness (ρ = 0.83, p = .079) and implant failure locations. A design of experiments was performed to quantify the models' sensitivities to varying cortical shell and cartilage thicknesses, cancellous bone and cartilage elastic moduli, and surgical medial column compression distance. Cartilage thickness and cartilage elastic modulus had the largest impact on medial column stiffness and compression distance had the greatest effect on cartilage contact area. Cortical shell thickness and cancellous bone properties did not have a significant effect on the measured parameters for the values tested. Overall, the FE models exhibited behavior that is consistent with known mechanical principles related to bending and composite structures as well as the experimental results. This study elucidates the effects of varying commonly assumed model parameters that can aid future studies aimed at screening implant designs.
Subject(s)
Finite Element Analysis , Biomechanical Phenomena , HumansABSTRACT
Charcot neuroarthropathy often results in a rocker-bottom foot deformity, which leads to ulceration, infection, and amputation. Surgical techniques to reconstruct the medial column include intramedullary beaming and plantar plating, with disagreement regarding which approach provides a stronger construct with superior stability and fixation. The objective of the present cadaveric study was to compare the construct rigidity and strength of beaming and plantar plating of the medial column of 5 paired bilateral feet. Cannulated titanium beams and plates were implanted in the right and left feet, respectively. The specimens underwent interval testing to generate load-displacement and load-strain curves, cyclic loading at low loads, and then were loaded to failure. The beamed and plated specimens had statistically similar stiffness (p = .80) with a mean of 11.1 ± 3.9 N/mm and 11.3 ± 5.9 N/mm, respectively. The beamed and plated specimens had a statistically similar mean strain of -164 ± 75.1 µÎµ and -208 ± 87.8 µÎµ on the dorsal (p = .45) and 92 ± 90.4 µÎµ and 221 ± 100.5 µÎµ on the plantar (p = .08) surfaces of the first metatarsal. Three beamed specimens failed from talus fracture (60%), and 2 beams plastically deformed (40%). Two plated specimens failed from talus fracture (40%), and 3 experienced screw pullout (60%). The beamed and plated specimens withstood a mean load to failure of 234 ± 111.4 N and 140 ± 68.9 N, respectively, with the difference statistically significant (p = .04). Overall, beaming was more robust than plantar plating, because it was less sensitive to specimen size and bone quality.
