Monitoring the hemostasis with rotation thromboelastometry in patients with acute STEMI on dual antiplatelet therapy: First experiences.

Rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastometric point-of-care-test for the complex evaluation of changes in hemostasis, performed in whole blood. However, no prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the antiplatelet therapy using ROTEM was performed.Fifty-six patients (34 men, 22 women, mean age 67.75 years, and age range 34-88 years) with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, undergoing urgent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of culprit coronary lesion were included. Three blood samples were taken (sample 1 taken before the urgent coronary angiography, sample 2 in 24 hours after the admission, and sample 3 in 30 days after acute STEMI). Twenty-one healthy blood donors (17 men, 4 women, mean age 50.38 years, and age range 40-74 years) were recruited as the control group. Blood samples were tested with ROTEM Gamma (Pentapharm GmbH, Munich, Germany) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA).Clotting time (CT) was significantly prolonged and maximum clot firmness (MCF) was significantly higher in patients compared to controls. Mean platelet aggregation after the induction with arachidonic acid (33.2% vs 74.6% in sample 1 and 21.1% vs 74.6% in sample 2), as well as adenosine diphosphate (51.4% vs 72.7% in sample 1 and 37.1% vs 72.7% in sample 2), were significantly lower in patients with acute STEMI.Significantly prolonged CT and increased MCF was found in patients with acute STEMI. This study confirmed the ability of ROTEM to identify changes in hemostasis in ACS patients on antithrombotic therapy.

Does Pantoprazole Affect the On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Patients With Acute STEMI Treated With ADP Receptor Blockers?-A Pilot Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibition (PPI) administrated together with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor blockers (ADPRB) significantly reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Nevertheless, there is a heated discussion about an interaction between PPI and ADPRB that leads to high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). STUDY QUESTION: Is there a relationship between pantoprazole PPI and HTPR on ADPRB therapy in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Single center pilot study in patients with acute STEMI was performed. This study enrolled totally 87 patients (34 clopidogrel-treated and 53 new ADPRB-treated patients). Pantoprazole was administrated in 33 patients. HTPR was detected with ADP-induced light transmission aggregometry and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation analysis. Samples were taken before coronary angiography (sample 1) and on the next day after the procedure (sample 2). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in pantoprazole-treated patients and patients without PPI neither in sample 1 (59.2 ± 29.5% vs. 54.9 ± 22.7%, P = 0.49) nor in sample 2 (43.8 ± 27.2% vs. 37.0 ± 22.9%, P = 0.30). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the platelet reactivity index of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation in both samples (sample 1: 53.3 ± 29.8% vs. 65.0 ± 20.5%, P = 0.11; sample 2: 30.8 ± 27.1% vs. 40.6 ± 27.5%, P = 0.19). A comparison of clopidogrel and new ADP receptor blockers in patients on pantoprazole PPI did not reveal significant differences in on-treatment platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not reveal interaction between pantoprazole and ADPRB in patients with acute STEMI.

Clopidogrel resistance in diabetic patient with acute myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis.

Stent thrombosis is a morbid complication after percutaneous coronary intervention. Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduces stent thrombosis risk and forms currently the basis in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction pharmacologic treatment. The introduction of clopidogrel has made a major advance in the acute coronary syndrome treatment. However, there is growing evidence about failure in antiplatelet response after clopidogrel, which may lead to subsequent risk of future thrombotic events. The antiplatelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel varies widely among individuals. High on-treatment platelet reactivity has been repeatedly associated with a hazard for cardiovascular events, including stent thrombosis. Laboratory monitoring of antiplatelet therapy efficacy may help identify patients with insufficient antiplatelet response. Prasugrel therapy was repeatedly described as an effective method to overcome clopidogrel resistance. We report a case of diabetic patient in whom myocardial reinfarction due to stent thrombosis developed. Clopidogrel resistance was detected in this patient using light transmission aggregometry and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assessment. After prasugrel administration, no other ischemic event occurred, and patient was released to outpatient care in good general condition.

Sticky platelets syndrome in a young patient with massive pulmonary embolism.

PATIENT: Female, 51. FINAL DIAGNOSIS: Sticky platelets syndrome. SYMPTOMS: Pulmonary embolism. MEDICATION: - CLINICAL PROCEDURE: Thrombolysis. SPECIALTY: Hematology. OBJECTIVE: Disease of unknown ethiology. BACKGROUND: Sticky platelets syndrome (SPS) is an inherited thrombophilia characterized by platelet hyperaggregability, which can lead to the higher risk of thrombosis. The etiology of SPS remains unclear, but several gene polymorphisms have been recently studied and autosomal dominant heredity is suspected. Although SPS is traditionally connected with arterial thrombosis, several cases of SPS as a cause of venous thromboembolism have been described. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 51-year-old apparently healthy woman with massive pulmonary embolism, who required thrombolytic therapy. In this patient SPS was identified as the only condition leading to higher risk of developing thromboembolic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although at present few physicians have practical experience with SPS, this syndrome may lead to serious health problems or even death. The presented case points to the benefit of SPS diagnostics in standard screening of inherited thrombophilia for effective prophylaxis and treatment in patients with venous thromboembolism.

Nine kindreds of familial sticky platelet syndrome phenotype.

INTRODUCTION: Sticky platelet syndrome (SPS) is most likely a hereditary thrombophilia characterized by platelet hyperaggregation after low concentrations of platelet inducers--adenosine diphosphate and/or epinephrine. We present 9 kindreds with SPS familial occurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Familial trait of SPS was looked up in the database of the National Center of Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Families with at least 3 SPS-positive members were studied, described, and presented. RESULTS: In the group of 1093 symptomatic patients, SPS was confirmed in 240 cases. Familial occurrence with at least 3 SPS-positive relatives was found in 9 cases. CONCLUSION: The exact pathogenesis of SPS is not sufficiently explained. Our findings seem to support the idea that SPS might have an autosomal dominant hereditary fashion.