Epidemiology of 936 humeral shaft fractures in a large Finnish trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Humeral shaft fractures are relatively common injuries and are classified according to location and fracture morphology. Epidemiological studies improve understanding of injury patterns and lay foundations for future research. There are only a few published larger epidemiological studies on humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of adult patients having sustained a humeral shaft fracture treated in the Helsinki University Hospital between 2006 and 2016. We recorded patient and fracture characteristics, timing and mechanism of injury, associated injuries, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: We identified 914 patients (489 females, median age = 61.4 years; 425 males, median age = 50.4 years) with 936 fractures. Over 60% of these fractures were sustained from simple falls. The patient age distribution was bimodal, with highest fracture rates in elderly females and young males. We divided the fractures into typical traumatic, periprosthetic, and pathological fractures. Of the 872 typical traumatic fractures, 3.0% were open. In addition, there were 24 (2.6%) periprosthetic and 40 (4.3%) pathological fractures. An associated injury was found in 24% of patients, with primary radial nerve palsy (PRNP) being the most common (10%). PRNPs were more common in distal shaft fractures and high energy injuries. The 1-year mortality was 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the most common injury mechanism was a simple fall. The most common associated injury was PRNP. The observed bimodal fracture distribution is consistent with previous literature.

Surgical strategy for femoral shaft fractures in severely injured patients: A 13-year experience from a tertiary trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy of femoral shaft fractures in polytraumatised patients has evolved over the years and led to improved outcomes for these patients. However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy and surgical care can differ markedly from one country to another. We investigate the surgical treatment strategy (Early Definitive Care (EDC) or Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO)) implemented in the care of severely injured patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at a single tertiary trauma centre in southern Finland and factors affecting decision making. METHODS: The Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR) was used retrospectively to identify severely injured patients (New Injury Severity Score [NISS] ≥ 16) treated from 2006 through to 2018 with concomitant femoral shaft fractures. Patients <16 years old, with isolated head injuries, dead on arrival and those admitted >24 h following the injury were excluded. Based on their initial surgical management strategy, femoral fracture patients were divided into EDC and DCO groups and compared. RESULTS: Compared to other trauma-registry patients, those with femoral shaft fractures are younger (30.9 ± 15.9 vs. 47.0 ± 19.7, p<0.001) and more often injured in road traffic accidents (64.1% vs. 34.4%, p<0.001). The majority (78%) of included patients underwent EDC. Patients who underwent DCO were significantly more severely injured (NISS: 40.1 ± 11.5 vs. 27.8 ± 10.1, p<0.001) with longer lengths of stay in ICU (15.4 ± 9.8 vs. 7.5 ± 6.1 days, p<0.001) and in hospital (29.9 ± 29.6 vs. 13.7 ± 11.4 days, p<0.001) than patients treated with EDC. Decision making was based primarily on injury related factors, while non-injury related factors may have contributed to choosing a DCO approach in a small number of cases. CONCLUSION: Early definitive care is the prevailing treatment strategy in severely injured femoral shaft fracture patients treated at a tertiary trauma centre. Patients treated with DCO strategy are more severely injured particularly having sustained worse intracranial and thoracic injuries. In addition to injury related factors, treatment strategy decision making was influenced by non-injury related factors in only a minority of cases.

[Timing of surgical treatment of fractures of multiply iniured patients - from science to tactics]. / Monivammapotilaan murtumien leikkaus- hoidon ajoitus - tieteestä hoitostrategiaan.

Timing of the treatment of orthopaedic injuries in multiply injured patients has undergone changes. The timing of definitive fracture management has varied from several weeks to within hours of injury. In many studies a clear benefit has been identified from early definitive care of long bone fractures: early total care (ETC). The most seriously injured patients benefit from damage control orthopaedics, an approach employing primary external fixator stabilization followed by secondary intramedullary nailing. Debate over these approaches with enhanced understanding of biological response to injury has led to recent emphasis on the need for aggressive patient monitoring and continued multidisciplinary evaluation of the patient's physiological response to treatment.

Implementing RFID technology in a novel triage system during a simulated mass casualty situation.

The purpose of this study is to determine the applicability of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology and commercial cellular networks to provide an online triage system for handling mass casualty situations. This was tested by a using a pilot system for a simulated mass casualty situation during a military field exercise. The system proved to be usable. Compared to the currently used system, it also dramatically improves the general view of mass casualty situations and enhances medical emergency readiness in a military medical setting. The system can also be adapted without any difficulties by the civilian sector for the management of mass casualty disasters.