Chromatin structure mapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in vivo with DNase I.

Most methods for assessment of chromatin structure involve chemical or nuclease damage to DNA followed by analysis of distribution and susceptibility of cutting sites. The agents used generally do not permeate cells, making nuclear isolation mandatory. In vivo mapping strategies might allow detection of labile constituents and/or structures that are lost when chromatin is swollen in isolated nuclei at low ionic strengths. DNase I has been the most widely used enzyme to detect chromatin sites where DNA is active in transcription, replication or recombination. We have introduced the bovine DNase I gene into yeast under control of a galactose-responsive promoter. Expression of the nuclease leads to DNA degradation and cell death. Shorter exposure to the active enzyme allows mapping of chromatin structure in whole cells without isolation of nuclei. The validity and efficacy of the strategy are demonstrated by footprinting a labile repressor bound to its operator. Investigation of the inter-nucleosome linker regions in several types of repressed domains has revealed different degrees of protection in cells, relative to isolated nuclei.

Tup1p represses Mcm1p transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of an a-cell-specific gene.

In yeast, a number of regulatory proteins expressed only in specific cell types interact with general transcription factors in a combinatorial manner to control expression of cell-type-specific genes. We report a detailed analysis of activation and repression events that occur at the promoter of the a-cell-specific STE6 gene fused to a beta-galactosidase gene in a yeast minichromosome, as well as factors that control the chromatin structure of this promoter both in the minichromosome and in the genomic STE6 locus. Mcm1p results in chromatin remodeling and is responsible for all transcriptional activity from the STE6 promoter in both wild-type a and alpha cells. Matalpha2p cooperates with Tup1p to block both chromatin remodeling and Mcm1p-associated activation. While Matalpha2p represses only Mcm1p, the Tup1p-mediated repression involves both Mcm1p-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Swi/Snf and Gcn5p, required for full induction of the STE6 gene, do not contribute to chromatin remodeling. We suggest that Tup1p can contribute to repression by blocking transcriptional activators, in addition to interacting with transcription machinery and stabilizing chromatin.

The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome.

In yeast alpha cells the a cell-specific genes STE6 and BAR1 are packaged as gene-sized chromatin domains of positioned nucleosomes. Organized chromatin depends on Tup1p, a corepressor that interacts with the N-terminal regions of H3 and H4. If Tup1p functions to organize or stabilize a chromatin domain, the protein might be expected to be present at a level stoichiometric with nucleosomes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays using Tup1p antibodies showed Tup1p to be associated with the entire genomic STE6 coding region. To determine stoichiometry of Tup1p associated with the gene, a yeast plasmid containing varying lengths of the STE6 gene including flanking control regions and an Escherichia coli lac operator sequence was constructed. After assembly into chromatin in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, minichromosomes were isolated using an immobilized lac repressor. In these experiments, Tup1p was found to be specifically associated with repressed STE6 chromatin in vivo at a ratio of about two molecules of the corepressor per nucleosome. These observations strongly suggest a structural role for Tup1p in repression and constrain models for organized chromatin in repressive domains.

High-resolution structural analysis of chromatin at specific loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae silent mating-type locus HMRa.

Genetic and biochemical evidence implicates chromatin structure in the silencing of the two quiescent mating-type loci near the telomeres of chromosome III in yeast. With high-resolution micrococcal nuclease mapping, we show that the HMRa locus has 12 precisely positioned nucleosomes spanning the distance between the E and I silencer elements. The nucleosomes are arranged in pairs with very short linkers; the pairs are separated from one another by longer linkers of approximately 20 bp. Both the basic amino-terminal region of histone H4 and the silent information regulator protein Sir3p are necessary for the organized repressive chromatin structure of the silent locus. Compared to HMRa, only small differences in the availability of the TATA box are present for the promoter in the cassette at the active MATa locus. Features of the chromatin structure of this silent locus compared to the previously studied HMLalpha locus suggest differences in the mechanisms of silencing and may relate to donor selection during mating-type interconversion.

In vivo methods to analyze chromatin structure.

A groundswell of interest in chromatin structure and its role in regulating the function of DNA in transcription, replication, recombination and repair has developed in the past decade. Fueled by genetic observations of effects of histone mutations on transcription and identification of genes whose products must alter chromatin structure as they affect gene activity, this subject leapt to the forefront in the past two years with the correlation of certain transcription factors with enzymes that post-translationally modify histones and are presumed to alter chromatin structure thereby. Surprisingly few experimental reports have actually addressed chromatin structure. In part, this may be related to the technical difficulties of traditional approaches to structure inference. Methods have become available recently for assessment of various aspects of chromatin structure in vivo. Study in intact cells may limit potential problems resulting from loss of components or rearrangement of structures and simplify analysis by eliminating the need for isolation of organelles.

Chromatin structure and analysis of mechanisms of activators and repressors.

Some transcriptional repressors appear to organize chromatin structure as at least part of their mechanism. Some transcriptional activators appear to alter or remodel chromatin structure as at least part of their mechanism. Understanding transcriptional regulation thus requires methods for investigation of the chromatin structure of specific genes in different states of functional activity. This paper reviews chemical and enzymatic approaches to determination of chromatin structure, the methods used for analysis of the results, and criteria for interpretation of the data to infer chromatin structures.

Cloning, characterization and expression of the gene coding for a cytosine-5-DNA methyltransferase recognizing GpC.

A novel gene encoding a cytosine-5-DNA methyltransferase recognizing the dinucleotide GpC was cloned from Chlorella virus NYs-1 and expressed in both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae . The gene was sequenced and a predicted polypeptide of 362 amino acids with a molecular weight of 41.903 kDa was identified. The protein contains several amino acid motifs with high similarity to those of other known 5-methylcytosine-forming methyltransferases. In addition, this enzyme, named M. Cvi PI, shares 66% identity and 76% similarity with M. Cvi JI, the only other cytosine-5-DNA methyltransferase cloned from a Chlorella virus. The short, frequently occurring recognition sequence of the new methyltransferase will be very useful for in vivo chromatin structure studies in both yeast and higher organisms.

High-resolution structural analysis of chromatin at specific loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae silent mating type locus HMLalpha.

Genetic studies have suggested that chromatin structure is involved in repression of the silent mating type loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromatin mapping at nucleotide resolution of the transcriptionally silent HMLalpha and the active MATalpha shows that unique organized chromatin structure characterizes the silent state of HMLalpha. Precisely positioned nucleosomes abutting the silencers extend over the alpha1 and alpha2 coding regions. The HO endonuclease recognition site, nuclease hypersensitive at MATalpha, is protected at HMLalpha. Although two precisely positioned nucleosomes incorporate transcription start sites at HMLalpha, the promoter region of the alpha1 and alpha2 genes is nucleosome free and more nuclease sensitive in the repressed than in the transcribed locus. Mutations in genes essential for HML silencing disrupt the nucleosome array near HML-I but not in the vicinity of HML-E, which is closer to the telomere of chromosome III. At the promoter and the HO site, the structure of HMLalpha in Sir protein and histone H4 N-terminal deletion mutants is identical to that of the transcriptionally active MATalpha. The discontinuous chromatin structure of HMLalpha contrasts with the continuous array of nucleosomes found at repressed a-cell-specific genes and the recombination enhancer. Punctuation at HMLalpha may be necessary for higher-order structure or karyoskeleton interactions. The unique chromatin architecture of HMLalpha may relate to the combined requirements of transcriptional repression and recombinational competence.

Mcm1 regulates donor preference controlled by the recombination enhancer in Saccharomyces mating-type switching.

Switching of Saccharomyces mating type by replacement of sequences at the MAT locus involves a choice between two donors, HML and HMR. MATalpha cells inhibit recombination along the entire left arm of chromosome III, including HML, whereas MATa cells activate this same region. MATa-dependent activation of HML depends on a small, cis-acting DNA sequence designated the recombination enhancer (RE), located 17 kb centromere-proximal to HML. A comparison of RE sequences interchangeable between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces carlsbergensis defines a minimum RE of 244 bp. RE activity is repressed in MATalpha cells by binding of the Matalpha2-Mcm1 corepressor to a site within the RE. Mutation of the two Matalpha2 binding sites removes most, but not all, of this repression, and RE chromatin structure in MATalpha cells becomes indistinguishable from that seen in MATa. Surprisingly, a 2-bp mutation in the Mcm1 binding site completely abolishes RE activity in MATa cells; moreover, RE chromatin structure in the MATa mutant becomes very similar to that seen in MATalpha cells with a normal RE, displaying highly ordered nucleosomes despite the absence of Matalpha2. Further, a mutation that alters the ability of Mcm1 to act with Matalpha2 in repressing a-specific genes also alters donor preference in either mating type. Thus, Mcm1 is critically responsible for the activation as well as the Matalpha2-Mcm1-mediated repression of RE activity.

The biochemical and phenotypic characterization of Hho1p, the putative linker histone H1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

There is currently no published report on the isolation and definitive identification of histone H1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It was, however, recently shown that the yeast HHO1 gene codes for a predicted protein homologous to H1 of higher eukaryotes (Landsman, D. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 287-288; Ushinsky, S. C., Bussey, H. , Ahmed, A. A., Wang, Y., Friesen, J., Williams, B. A., and Storms, R. K. (1997) Yeast 13, 151-161), although there is no biochemical evidence that shows that Hho1p is, indeed, yeast histone H1. We showed that purified recombinant Hho1p (rHho1p) has electrophoretic and chromatographic properties similar to linker histones. The protein forms a stable ternary complex with a reconstituted core di-nucleosome in vitro at molar rHho1p:core ratios up to 1. Reconstitution of rHho1p with H1-stripped chromatin confers a kinetic pause at approximately 168 base pairs in the micrococcal nuclease digestion pattern of the chromatin. These results strongly suggest that Hho1p is a bona fide linker histone. We deleted the HHO1 gene and showed that the strain is viable and has no growth or mating defects. Hho1p is not required for telomeric silencing, basal transcriptional repression, or efficient sporulation. Unlike core histone mutations, a hho1Delta strain does not exhibit a Sin or Spt phenotype. The absence of Hho1p does not lead to a change in the nucleosome repeat length of bulk chromatin nor to differences in the in vivo micrococcal nuclease cleavage sites in individual genes as detected by primer extension mapping.

Rapid detection of functional expression of C-5-DNA methyltransferases in yeast.

We have previously employed the cytosine-5-DNA methyltransferase (MTase), M. Sss I, as a probe for chromatin architecture in intact cells. Although M. Sss I offers the highest resolution of any currently available MTase, the difficulty in establishing stable, methylation-positive strains poses a barrier to its general utility as a chromatin probe. We describe a simple screen for M. Sss I-expressing strains that eliminates the purification of PCR products amplified from bisulfite-treated DNA, use of radioisotopes, polyacrylamide sequencing gel electrophoresis, and autoradiography. The high throughput of the method now makes it feasible to introduce M. Sss I into a variety of wild-type and mutant genetic backgrounds.

Gal4p-mediated chromatin remodeling depends on binding site position in nucleosomes but does not require DNA replication.

Biochemical studies have demonstrated decreased binding of various proteins to DNA in nucleosome cores as their cognate sites are moved from the edge of the nucleosome to the pseudodyad (center). However, to date no study has addressed whether this structural characteristic of nucleosomes modulates the function of a transcription factor in living cells, where processes of DNA replication and chromatin modification or remodeling could significantly affect factor binding. Using a sensitive, high-resolution methyltransferase assay, we have monitored the ability of Gal4p in vivo to interact with a nucleosome at positions that are known to be inaccessible in nucleosome cores in vitro. Gal4p efficiently bound a single cognate site (UASG) centered at 41 bp from the edge of a positioned nucleosome, perturbing chromatin structure and inducing transcription. DNA binding and chromatin perturbation accompanying this interaction also occurred in the presence of hydroxyurea, indicating that DNA replication is not necessary for Gal4p-mediated nucleosome disruption. These data extend previous studies, which demonstrated DNA replication-independent chromatin remodeling, by showing that a single dimer of Gal4p, without the benefit of cooperative interactions that occur at complex wild-type promoters, is competent for invasion of a preestablished nucleosome. When the UASG was localized at the nucleosomal pseudodyad, relative occupancy by Gal4p, nucleosome disruption, and transcriptional activation were substantially compromised. Therefore, despite the increased nucleosome binding capability of Gal4p in cells, the precise translational position of a factor binding site in one nucleosome in an array can affect the ability of a transcriptional regulator to overcome the repressive influence of chromatin.

Interplay of yeast global transcriptional regulators Ssn6p-Tup1p and Swi-Snf and their effect on chromatin structure.

Transcriptional regulation in yeast involves a number of general trans-acting factors affecting chromatin structure. The Swi-Snf complex is required for expression of a large number of genes and has the ability to remodel chromatin in vitro. The Ssn6p-Tup1p repressor complex may be involved in chromatin organization through the interaction with pathway-specific DNA-binding proteins. To study the interplay of these factors and their effect on chromatin we have analyzed SUC2 chromatin structure in wild-type cells and in strains bearing combinations of ssn6/tup1 and swi1 mutations. We have mapped nucleosome positioning of the repressed gene in wild-type cells using primer extension methodology, allowing base pair resolution, and have analyzed details of chromatin remodeling in the derepressed state. In ssn6 or tup1 mutants under repressing conditions the observed changes in SUC2 chromatin structure may be suppressed by the swi1 mutation, suggesting that Ssn6p-Tup1p is not required for the establishment of nucleosome positioning at the SUC2 promoter. Our data indicate the involvement of chromatin remodeling factors distinct from the Swi-Snf complex in SUC2 transcriptional regulation and suggest that Swi-Snf may antagonize Ssn6p-Tup1p by controlling remodeling activity. We also show that a relatively high level of SUC2 transcription can coexist with positioned nucleosomes.

Cell type-specific chromatin organization of the region that governs directionality of yeast mating type switching.

Switching of mating type in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is directional; MAT alpha cells recombine to transfer information from HMRa while MATa cells switch using the silent cassette at HML alpha. Genetic analysis recently has defined a 700 bp recombination enhancer approximately 29 kb from the left end of chromosome III that is necessary for directionality. The chromatin structure of this region differs strikingly in a- and alpha-cells. Mat alpha2p organizes a 3.7 kb chromatin domain that opposes interaction of trans-acting proteins with the enhancer. In a-cells lacking the alpha2 repressor, two footprinted regions flank an approximately 100 bp section having a unique DNA structure. This structural signature probably reflects interactions of proteins that result in directional mating type switching.

Direct study of DNA-protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells.

Current methods for analysis of chromatin architecture are invasive, utilizing chemicals or nucleases that damage DNA, making detection of labile constituents and conclusions about true in vivo structure problematic. We describe a sensitive assay of chromatin structure which is performed in intact, living yeast. The approach utilizes expression of SssI DNA methyltransferase (MTase) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to provide an order-of-magnitude increase in resolution over previously introduced MTases. Combining this resolution increase with the novel application of a PCR-based, positive chemical display of modified cytosines provides a significant advance in the direct study of DNA-protein interactions in growing cells that enables quantitative footprinting. The validity and efficacy of the strategy are demonstrated in mini-chromosomes, where positioned nucleosomes and a labile, operator-bound repressor are detected. Also, using a heterologous system to study gene activation, we show that in vivo hormone occupancy of the estrogen receptor is required for maximal site-specific DNA binding, whereas, at very high receptor-expression levels, hormone-independent partial occupancy of an estrogen-responsive element was observed. Receptor binding to a palindromic estrogen-responsive element leads to a footprint with strand-specific asymmetry, which is explicable by known structural information.

Modified curved DNA that could allow local DNA underwinding at the nucleosomal pseudodyad fails to position a nucleosome in vivo.

In competitive in vitro reconstitution experiments synthetic DNA composed of tandem repeats of the repetitive sequence (A/T)3NN(G/C)3NN, specifically the 20 bp 'TG sequence' (5'-TCGGTGTTAGAGCCTGTAAC-3'), was reported to associate with the histone octamer with an affinity higher than that of nucleosomally derived DNA. However, at least two groups have independently shown that tandem repeats of the TG sequence do not accommodate a stably positioned nucleosome in vivo. It was suggested that the anisotropic flexibility of the TG sequence, governed by a 10 bp sequence periodicity, is incompatible with the required underwinding of the DNA helix at the nucleosome pseudodyad while maintaining a bending preference that can be accommodated in the remainder of the nucleosome. Here we test this hypothesis directly by studying the in vivo nucleosomal structure of modified TG sequences designed to accommodate underwinding at the pseudodyad. We show that these modifications are not sufficient to allow stable incorporation of the TG sequence repeat into a nucleosome in vivo, but do note invasion from one end of the TG heptamer of a translationally random but rotationally constrained nucleosome. We discuss possible reasons for the absence of nucleosomes from the TG sequence in vivo.

The global transcriptional regulators, SSN6 and TUP1, play distinct roles in the establishment of a repressive chromatin structure.

Repression of a-cell specific gene expression in yeast alpha cells requires MAT alpha 2 and MCM1, as well as two global repressors, SSN6 and TUP1. Previous studies demonstrated that nucleosomes positioned adjacent to the alpha 2/MCM1 operator in alpha cells directly contribute to repression. To investigate the possibility that SSN6 and TUP1 provide a link between MAT alpha 2/MCM1 and neighboring histones, nucleosome locations were examined in ssn6 and tup1 alpha cells. In both cases, nucleosome positions downstream of the operator were disrupted, and the severity of the disruption correlated with the degree of derepression. Nevertheless, the observed changes in chromatin structure were not dependent on transcription. Our data strongly indicate that SSN6 and TUP1 directly organize repressive regions of chromatin.