ABSTRACT
The Health and Disability System Review (the 'Simpson Review') was an opportunity for health sector transformation, particularly in light of the recent damning WAI 2575 Waitangi Tribunal report released during the review process. There appears to have been a concerted effort to engage with the sector, an impressive Maori Expert Advisory Group and an extensive body of available scholarship documenting where improvements could be made. In this viewpoint, the authors, tangata whenua (Indigenous people of the land) and tangata Tiriti (people of te Tiriti) and health scholars and leaders undertook a high-level review of the Simpson Review report and analysed it against key elements of te Tiriti o Waitangi. The Simpson Review was an opportunity to share power, commit to Maori health and embed structural mechanisms, such as the proposed Maori health authority, to uphold te Tiriti o Waitangi. It was also an opportunity to recommit to health equity and eliminate institutional racism. We conclude that the Simpson Review did not take up these opportunities, but instead perpetuated further breaches of te Tiriti.
Subject(s)
Cultural Competency , Health Equity/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services, Indigenous/standards , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Quality of Health Care/standards , Humans , New Zealand , Racism/prevention & controlABSTRACT
The 2019 IUHPE Global Health Promotion Conference held in Rotorua New Zealand, provided an unparalleled opportunity to demonstrate the contribution of health promotion to the achievement of planetary health and sustainable development. This brief conference report outlines the intent of the two conference statements and calls for action by health promoters at all levels to integrate these principles into their everyday work.
Subject(s)
Global Health , Health Promotion , Congresses as Topic , Health Services, Indigenous , Humans , Sustainable DevelopmentABSTRACT
AIMS: To report the results of a randomized controlled trial which explored the effectiveness of clinical simulation in improving the clinical performance of recognizing and managing an adult deteriorating patient in hospital. BACKGROUND: There is evidence that final year undergraduate nurses may lack knowledge, clinical skills and situation awareness required to manage a deteriorating patient competently. The effectiveness of clinical simulation as a strategy to teach the skills required to recognize and manage the early signs of deterioration needs to be evaluated. DESIGN: This study was a two centre phase II single, randomized, controlled trial with single blinded assessments. METHOD: Data were collected in July 2013. Ninety-eight first year nursing students were randomized either into a control group, where they received a traditional lecture, or an intervention group where they received simulation. Participants completed a pre- and postintervention objective structured clinical examination. General Perceived Self Efficacy and Self-Reported Competency scores were measured before and after the intervention. Student satisfaction with teaching was also surveyed. RESULTS: The intervention group performed significantly better in the post-objective structured clinical examination. There was no significant difference in the postintervention General Perceived Self Efficacy and Self-Reported Competency scores between the control and intervention group. The intervention group was significantly more satisfied with their teaching method. CONCLUSION: Simulation-based education may be an effective educational strategy to teach nurses the skills to effectively recognize and manage a deteriorating patient.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Critical Illness/nursing , Education, Nursing/methods , Simulation Training/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Disease Progression , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Efficacy , Single-Blind Method , Students, Nursing/psychology , Teaching/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
Nurse education needs to be responsive to changes not only within health policy but also those relating to workforce development. Viewed within this context this discussion paper highlights areas of consideration when planning for and responding to such demands.