Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Cranio ; : 1-6, 2022 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35635335

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), hyaluronic acid (HA), and saline intra-articular injections following temporomandibular joint arthroscopy on decreasing pain and increasing maximal mouth opening. METHODS: Included patients were randomized into three groups: PRGF group, hyaluronic acid group, and control group. Intra-articular injections were done at the end of the arthroscopy. Pain was measured using the VAS scale preoperatively, 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Maximal mouth opening was measured preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in pain in all groups, although, the decrease was significantly greater in the HA group following surgery. CONCLUSION: A hyaluronic acid injection following temporomandibular joint arthroscopy can decrease pain better than saline and platelet-rich plasma during the first postoperative week. However, the results do not differ in later postoperative periods.

2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(3)2021 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33803540

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: The aim of our study was to analyze the concentrations of inflammatory markers in the nasal tissue of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs) and controls of different age groups, as well as to find associations between age, inflammation development, and NPs. Materials and methods: Patients were divided into two groups-patients with CRSwNPs and control subjects who had nasal surgery for another reason beside CRS. Our analysis was performed across three different age groups (18-30 years, 31-50 years, and 51 years and more). Tissue biopsies from the sinus cavity for all study participants were taken and frozen at -80 °C, until use. The concentrations of IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-13, IL-21, and IL-22, were quantified using a magnetic bead-based multiplex assay. Results: In the group aged 18-30 years, the levels of inflammatory markers IL-1, IL-2, IL-5, and IL-22 were significantly higher in patients with CRSwNPs than the control subjects. Among patients aged 31-50 years, significantly higher concentrations of IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-22 were recorded in patients with CRSwNPs, as compared to the control subjects. In the oldest group (aged 51 years and more), patients with CRSwNPs had significantly higher concentrations of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-22, as compared to the control group. In the CRSwNP group, only the concentration of IL-21 was significantly higher among patients aged 31-50 years, as compared with those aged 51 years and older (p = 0.013). Conclusions: IL-2 and IL-22 levels were significantly higher in patients with CRSwNP than the control, across all age groups. Only the concentration of IL-21 was higher among patients with CRSwNP in the middle age group, as compared to the oldest group. IL-2, IL-4, and IL-22 levels correlated with the severity of CRSwNPs. Elevated concentrations of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-22 were determined in patients' groups with higher sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores, pointing to more severe clinical symptoms.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Adolescent , Adult , Chronic Disease , Humans , Middle Aged , Nasal Polyps/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
3.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 11(8): 1235-1248, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33583151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from non-odontogenic rhinosinusitis, and often requires multidisciplinary collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental providers to make the diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to develop international multidisciplinary consensus on diagnosing ODS. METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to assess for expert consensus on diagnosing bacterial ODS. A multidisciplinary panel of 17 authors with ODS expertise from 8 countries (8 otolaryngologists, 9 dental specialists) was assembled. Each author completed 2 of 3 surveys (2 specialty-specific, and 1 for all authors). Thirty-seven clinical statements were created, focusing on 4 important diagnostic components: suspecting ODS; confirming sinusitis in ODS; confirming different dental pathologies causing ODS; and multidisciplinary collaborative aspects of diagnosing ODS. Target audiences were all otolaryngologists and dental providers. RESULTS: Of the 37 clinical statements, 36 reached consensus or strong consensus, and 1 reached no consensus. Strong consensus was reached that certain clinical and microbiologic features should arouse suspicion for ODS, and that multidisciplinary collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental providers is generally required to diagnose ODS. To diagnose ODS, otolaryngologists should confirm sinusitis mainly based on nasal endoscopic findings of middle meatal purulence, edema, or polyps, and dental providers should confirm dental pathology based on clinical examination and dental imaging. CONCLUSION: Based on multidisciplinary international consensus, diagnosing ODS generally requires otolaryngologists to confirm sinusitis, and dental providers to confirm maxillary odontogenic pathology. Importantly, both dental providers and otolaryngologists should suspect ODS based on certain clinical features, and refer patients to appropriate providers for disease confirmation.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Sinusitis , Sinusitis , Consensus , Endoscopy , Humans , Otolaryngologists , Sinusitis/diagnosis
4.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 34(6): 767-774, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32475127

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of chronic odontogenic and nonodontogenic rhinosinusitis is different. It requires the elimination of odontogenic cause and optimal sinus surgical treatment. To date, there are no clear indications when sinus surgical treatment is necessary. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to define clear indication(s) for sinus surgical treatment in patients with chronic odontogenic rhinosinusitis after elimination of odontogenic cause. METHODS: A group of 96 patients with chronic odontogenic rhinosinusitis caused by apical periodontitis completed a Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire with incorporated additional symptom "malodor" before treatment. Moreover, they were distributed according to computed tomography (CT) radiological criteria such as degree of periapical pathology, anatomical ratio between maxillary lateral teeth and sinus floor, sinus mucosal thickening, and ostiomeatal complex condition. The elimination of odontogenic cause was performed by extracting causative tooth. Questionnaire was filled again 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. All data were analyzed to search the clear indications for sinus surgical treatment. RESULTS: Of 96 patients, 74 (77.1%) patients had full resolution of symptoms after dental cause was eliminated. For other 22 (22.9%) patients, symptoms persisted and sinus surgical treatment was indicated. In recovered group, mean SNOT-22 score was different between all periods of measuring, while within nonrecovered group, small differences were seen only when compared to before treatment. No statistically significant correlation between radiological criteria and rhinosinusitis healing after tooth extraction was found (P > .05). Statistically significant correlation was found between the disappearance of malodor/SNOT-22 score reduction after elimination of dental cause and healing success (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that extraction of causative tooth is an effective treatment of chronic odontogenic rhinosinusitis caused by apical periodontitis. CT criteria are not valuable indicator for sinus surgery, but persistence of malodor after 2 weeks is the strongest indication for this type of treatment.


Subject(s)
Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinus Floor Augmentation , Sinusitis , Chronic Disease , Endoscopy , Humans , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery
5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 31(3): 637-641, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895845

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthroscopies are often finished with intraarticular injections. There are a couple of different substances that can be injected into the articular cavity following arthroscopy; however, it is still unclear which one can help to reach the best clinical results.The aim of this systematic review was to compare different substances that can be injected intraarticularly following TMJ arthroscopy to enhance clinical success.A review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42018114833). An electronic search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, PlosOne, and Science Direct databases using a combination of the terms "temporomandibular" and "arthroscopy" to identify clinical trials published from 2009 until 2019. Mean differences of pain levels were evaluated in random-effect meta-analysis.In total, 951 records were screened, of which only 3 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included into qualitative data synthesis, and only 2 articles were included into quantitative data analysis.The results showed that subjects who received plasma rich in growth factors intraarticular injections had statistically significantly lower pain levels 18 months postoperatively than patients who received hyaluronic acid injections.The results of the meta-analysis revealed that intraarticular injections followed by TMJ arthroscopy were more effective than arthroscopy alone in pain management (mean difference = -1.00, 95% confidence interval: -4.76 to 2.77, I = 97% with significant heterogeneity).The authors conclude that, although the sample is not extensive (only 3 studies), a tendency towards the superiority of plasma rich in growth factors over other treatments is seen in pain management of TMD.


Subject(s)
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Arthroscopy , Biometry , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use , Pain Management , Pain, Postoperative , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/drug therapy
6.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 33(1): 44-50, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30311505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) and rhinogenic sinusitis (RS) are the main types of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and have a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL), but the difference in HRQL and symptom presentation between them has not been specifically evaluated to date. Obejctive: Our aim was to compare patterns of symptoms and HRQL disease-specific domains in patients affected with these 2 types of CRS. METHODS: A group of 201 patients with CRS (99 with rhinogenic and 102 with odontogenic origin) completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire before treatment. Data sets were analyzed by using principal component analysis (PCA) to identify a set of symptom components together with the items excluded from PCA, which were then analyzed for differences between patients with OMS and RS. RESULTS: PCA of SNOT-22 items identified 5 components: "rhinologic," "extranasal rhinologic," "ear/facial," "sleep and functional disturbance," and "emotional disturbance." Sneezing was excluded from PCA and treated as separate outcome variable and was significantly worse in RS patients. Patients with OMS scored significantly higher scores with regard to emotional disturbance, while RS patients scored significantly worse in sleep and functional disturbance. The extra symptom "malodor" was the most different symptom and was significantly worse in OMS patients. The total SNOT-22 score was not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: With controlling of covariates that may influence the severity of the disease, this study showed some significant differences in symptom patterns and HRQL impairment between patients with OMS and RS. Malodor is the most characteristic feature of OMS. Therefore, OMS should always be suspected in patients complaining of bad breath.


Subject(s)
Paranasal Sinuses/pathology , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Tooth/pathology , Adult , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odorants , Principal Component Analysis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/physiopathology , Sinusitis/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Stomatologija ; 20(1): 22-26, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29806655

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to review the main treatment options for odontogenic sinusitis that are used today. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, PMC, Science Direct data bases. For a literature review search keywords were used: odontogenic sinusitis, odontogenic maxillary sinusitis treatment OR diagnosis, maxillary sinusitis of dental source OR dental origin OR etiology. RESULTS: 2886 articles were found in the databases using keywords. After duplicate citations screened, inclusion/exclusion criteria applied, excluded articles after titles, summaries and full-text reading 25 articles were included in the literature review. CONCLUSION: Although clinical symptomatology is not conspicuous among other types of sinusitis, the odontogenic maxillary sinusitis treatment regimen is different. It consists of eliminating dental infection and management of sinusitis. The usage of Caldwell-Luc approach is limited these days and recommended only when a better access to sinus is needed, for example, removing large foreign bodies. Endoscopic sinus surgery is widely used these days to remove the inflamed sinus mucosa, foreign bodies, displaced teeth, while preserving physiological function of the sinus. Sometimes dental infection removal alone is sufficient to resolve the odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, but sometimes concomitant endoscopic sinus surgery or Caldwell-Luc approach is necessary for full resolution.


Subject(s)
Focal Infection, Dental/therapy , Maxillary Sinus/surgery , Maxillary Sinusitis/surgery , Tooth Diseases/complications , Endoscopy , Focal Infection, Dental/complications , Humans , Maxillary Sinusitis/etiology , Maxillary Sinusitis/therapy , Tooth Diseases/therapy
8.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 274(10): 3651-3658, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28733779

ABSTRACT

The objective of the study was to compare the ability of dental, ENT and radiology specialists to identify the dental cause of maxillary sinusitis with conventional computed tomography, dental and panoramic radiographs. Out of 34 dental records from subjects treated at ENT and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, LUHS Kaunas Clinics, 22 females and 12 males with the diagnosis of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, periapical (DPA), panoramic (DPR) and computed tomography (CT) images of posterior maxilla were selected for further studies. In total, 39 sinuses with an odontogenic and 37 sinuses with only rhinogenic cause (control group) were included in the study. Sinuses with mucosal thickening less than 3 mm were excluded from the research. Each image was evaluated by 5 endodontologists, 5 oral surgeons, 6 general dentists, 6 otorhinolaryngologists and an experienced oral radiologist. DPR and DPA views were not evaluated by ENT specialists. The dental cause of maxillary sinusitis was marked according to the given scale. Intraclass correlation coefficient and ROC curve statistical analysis were performed. The best accuracy was observed when CT views were evaluated by experienced oral radiologist and oral surgeons: the AUC was 0.958 and 0.859, respectively. DPR views showed the best accuracy when evaluated by oral surgeons (0.763) and DPA-by endodontologists (0.736). The highest inter-rater agreement was observed between experienced oral radiologist and oral surgeons/otorhinolaryngologists (0.87/0.78) evaluating CT. Sensitivity and specificity of CT were 89.7 and 94.6%, DPR-68.2 and 77.3%, DPA-77.9 and 67%. Identification of dental cause of maxillary sinusitis sometimes is a challenge, which depends on radiological method and, more importantly, on evaluator's experience.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Maxillary Sinusitis , Radiography, Panoramic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tooth Diseases/complications , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Maxillary Sinusitis/diagnosis , Maxillary Sinusitis/etiology , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome
9.
Stomatologija ; 17(1): 29-32, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183855

ABSTRACT

We present a case of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis whose sinonasal symptomatology was thought to be the consequence of a previous midfacial trauma. The patient was admitted to the Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery after more than 10 years of exacerbations of sinonasal symptoms, which began to plague soon after a facial contusion. We decided to perform CT of paranasal sinuses, and despite the absence dental symptomatology, the dental origin of sinusitis was discovered. The majority of sinonasal symptoms resolved after appropriate dental treatment, and there was no need for nasal or sinus surgery.


Subject(s)
Bone Resorption/complications , Maxillary Diseases/complications , Maxillary Sinusitis/etiology , Oral Fistula/complications , Respiratory Tract Fistula/complications , Adult , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Injuries/complications
10.
Stomatologija ; 16(2): 39-43, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25209225

ABSTRACT

Maxillary sinusitis of odontogenic origin is a well-known condition in both the dental and otolaryngology communities. It occurs when the Schneiderian membrane is violated by conditions arising from dentoalveolar unit. This type of sinusitis differs in its pathophysiology, microbiology, diagnostics and management from sinusitis of other causes, therefore, failure to accurately identify a dental cause in these patients usually lead to persistent symptomatology and failure of medical and surgical therapies directed toward sinusitis. Unilateral recalcitrant disease associated with foul smelling drainage is a most common feature of odontogenic sinusitis. Also, high-resolution CT scans and cone-beam volumetric computed tomography can assist in identifying dental disease. Sometimes dental treatment alone is adequate to resolve the odontogenic sinusitis and sometimes concomitant or subsequent functional endoscopic sinus surgery or Caldwell-Luc operation is required. The aim of this article is to give a review of the most common causes, symptoms, diagnostic and treatment methods of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Search on Cochrane Library, PubMed and Science Direct data bases by key words resulted in 35 articles which met our criteria. It can be concluded that the incidence of odontogenic sinusitis is likely underreported in the available literature.


Subject(s)
Maxillary Sinusitis/etiology , Periodontal Diseases/complications , Tooth Diseases/complications , Humans , Maxillary Sinusitis/diagnosis , Maxillary Sinusitis/therapy , Periodontal Diseases/diagnosis , Periodontal Diseases/therapy , Tooth Diseases/diagnosis , Tooth Diseases/therapy
11.
Stomatologija ; 16(4): 153-60, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25896040

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Understanding the mechanisms of bone morphogenesis is essential in solving problems related to reconstruction of bone defects. In a field of bone morphogenesis enormous array of biologically active substances have been proved as having more or less influence on bone growth, but no ideal guiding path for a new bone formation has been established yet. Therefore, bone tissue engineering, based on the laws of osteogenesis, becomes a significant niche for investigation. The aim of this article is to review recent scientific information concerning the role of bio substances in osteogenesis, their potentials in and future prospects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medline library database was searched, focusing on stem cells, osteoblast differentiation, bone growth factors and bone tissue engineering. Limits were review, research support. A quality assessment was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 63 articles matching our criteria were found: 20 reviews summarizing topics of growth factors, stem cells, tissue engineering and 43 articles representing studies of growth factors impact in osteoblast differentiation, bone regeneration and bone engineering. CONCLUSIONS: The interactions among growth factors in osteoblast differentiation cascade are not fully understood. Moreover, methods of conversion of laboratory processes into clinically effective, reproducible, safe, economically viable and competitive products need to be improved.


Subject(s)
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/physiology , Osteogenesis/physiology , Signal Transduction/physiology , Bone Regeneration/physiology , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Humans , Osteoblasts/physiology , Stem Cells/physiology , Tissue Engineering/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...