Optimizing Brazilian Buttock Lift Results Using the BBL Assessment Tool.

The most distinguished feature of the female silhouette is the buttock. As such, the Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) has become the most popular plastic surgery procedures in recent years. Despite the popularity of this buttock reshaping and augmentation procedure, there remains no prevailing standard for evaluating, planning surgical design, and objectifying buttock size and shape outcomes. In fact, we have observed a wide range of preferred buttock size and shapes among our patients. We have previously published the BBL assessment tool that serves to guide patient communication of their preferred buttock size and shape. In this study, we demonstrate how the BBL assessment tool can serve to optimize Brazilian Buttock Lift results. We present 25 case studies of how the BBL assessment tool can serve to optimize BBL results by providing a guide for evaluation, surgical design, and objectification of outcomes.Level of Evidence IV Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Breast Lift Algorithm for the Treatment of Breast Implant Illness Requiring Implant Removal.

BACKGROUND: The recommendation of breast lift surgery in the setting of patients requiring breast implant removal is twofold. First, a breast lift is indicated for patients who present with breast mound or nipple-areolar complex ptosis. Second, a breast lift is indicated to accommodate the forecasted redundancy in skin and breast ptosis created by implant explantation. The most popular approaches to mastopexy include the inferior and superior pedicled breast lifts. We present a surgical algorithm with diagrams and cases clarifying mastopexy approaches for patients desiring breast implant removal in patients presenting with breast implant illness syndrome. METHODS: An algorithm was developed to explain the process for selecting the ideal pedicle approach for mastopexy and implant removal surgeries. RESULTS: Three cases are presented to illustrate the application of each pedicle under different presentations and goals. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages of an inferior pedicle include the capacity for unlimited lifting of the nipple-areola complex and for preservation of maximal breast mound volume. Its disadvantages include the inability to remove the breast capsule simultaneously and contraindicated if the lower breast pole is contracted. The advantages of a superior pedicle include the ability to remove the entire capsule and to eliminate lower breast pole if it is contracted. Its disadvantages include limitations to how high the nipple-areola complex can be lifted and the inability to preserve maximal breast mound volume. With the current trend for the request of implant removal in patients presenting with breast implant illness syndrome, the algorithm presented may assist surgeons with selecting the ideal breast lift and implant removal approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .