ABSTRACT
AIM: He aim of this paper was to investigate the incidence of and the indications for conversion to general anesthesia (GA) in a large single-center series of patients undergoing carotid surgery under cervical plexus block (CPB). METHODS: With IRB approval we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients who underwent carotid surgery under CPB from November 2007 to October 2010. Cervical plexus was blocked at both the superficial and deep levels. An intraluminal shunt was inserted in patients who demonstrated signs of inadequate cerebral perfusion upon carotid clamping (CC). Propofol was given to patients reporting pain or discomfort throughout the procedure. The primary outcomes were the number and percentage of conversions to GA as well as the indications for this intervention. The secondary outcome was the incidence of partial cervical block failure, defined as the need for supplemental propofol administration for pain relief during surgery. RESULTS: In total, 1464 carotid surgical procedures were performed under CPB in 1305 consecutive patients during the investigated period. Conversion to GA was required in 17 (1.2%) patients. The most common reason for conversion to GA was persisting neurological deterioration upon CC and intraluminal shunt insertion, which was recorded in 8/17 (47.1%) procedures. Other indications to convert were systemic toxicity of local anesthetics, pain, general discomfort and restlessness during surgery, and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Cervical plexus block for carotid surgery is associated with a low rate of conversions to GA. Neurological deterioration upon carotid clamping and local anesthetic toxicity are identified as the most common indications for such intervention.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Carotid Arteries/surgery , Cervical Plexus Block , Propofol/administration & dosage , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Carotid Arteries/physiopathology , Cervical Plexus Block/adverse effects , Constriction , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Seizures/chemically induced , Serbia , Treatment Failure , Unconsciousness/chemically induced , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Out of 100 patients treated by intraarterial perfusion of prostaglandin E1 we selected 36 cases who have been treated after a lumbar sympathectomy or reconstruction on the femoro-popliteal segment. The patients were in the III and IV stage of occlusive diseases by Fontain. All patients were divided into four groups: (a) prostaglandin E1 after a lumbar sympathectomy (20); (b) prostaglandin E1 after failed femoro-popliteal bypass (8); (c) prostaglandin E1 with patent femoro-popliteal bypass and distal progression of the occlusive disease (3); (d) prostaglandin E1 with previously femoro-popliteal reconstruction and poor run off (5). After intraoperative introduction of a catheter into the superficial femoral artery, profunda femoral artery (a, b), a patent graft (c) or just implanted graft (d), a continuous intraarterial perfusion of prostaglandin E1 was applied, in doses 10 nanograms/kg body weight/minute, in total doses 3000 nanograms. The perfusion time was 48-72 h. The patients were controlled immediately after treatment as well as 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after. Our early and late results of the intraarterial perfusion of prostaglandin E1 proved as a very successful limb salvage procedure.
