Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Proteome Res ; 23(6): 2306-2314, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684072

ABSTRACT

With the increased usage and diversity of methods and instruments being applied to analyze Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) data, visualization is becoming increasingly important to validate automated software results. Here we present MassDash, a cross-platform DIA mass spectrometry visualization and validation software for comparing features and results across popular tools. MassDash provides a web-based interface and Python package for interactive feature visualizations and summary report plots across multiple automated DIA feature detection tools, including OpenSwath, DIA-NN, and dreamDIA. Furthermore, MassDash processes peptides on the fly, enabling interactive visualization of peptides across dozens of runs simultaneously on a personal computer. MassDash supports various multidimensional visualizations across retention time, ion mobility, m/z, and intensity, providing additional insights into the data. The modular framework is easily extendable, enabling rapid algorithm development of novel peak-picker techniques, such as deep-learning-based approaches and refinement of existing tools. MassDash is open-source under a BSD 3-Clause license and freely available at https://github.com/Roestlab/massdash, and a demo version can be accessed at https://massdash.streamlit.app.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Internet , Mass Spectrometry , Peptides , Software , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Peptides/analysis , Peptides/chemistry , Proteomics/methods , Humans , User-Computer Interface
2.
Commun Biol ; 6(1): 1101, 2023 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37903988

ABSTRACT

DIA is a mainstream method for quantitative proteomics, but consistent quantification across multiple LC-MS/MS instruments remains a bottleneck in parallelizing data acquisition. One reason for this inconsistency and missing quantification is the retention time shift which current software does not adequately address for runs from multiple sites. We present multirun chromatogram alignment strategies to map peaks across columns, including the traditional reference-based Star method, and two novel approaches: MST and Progressive alignment. These reference-free strategies produce a quantitatively accurate data-matrix, even from heterogeneous multi-column studies. Progressive alignment also generates merged chromatograms from all runs which has not been previously achieved for LC-MS/MS data. First, we demonstrate the effectiveness of multirun alignment strategies on a gold-standard annotated dataset, resulting in a threefold reduction in quantitation error-rate compared to non-aligned DIA results. Subsequently, on a multi-species dataset that DIAlignR effectively controls the quantitative error rate, improves precision in protein measurements, and exhibits conservative peak alignment. We next show that the MST alignment reduces cross-site CV by 50% for highly abundant proteins when applied to a dataset from 11 different LC-MS/MS setups. Finally, the reanalysis of 949 plasma runs with multirun alignment revealed a more than 50% increase in insulin resistance (IR) and respiratory viral infection (RVI) proteins, identifying 11 and 13 proteins respectively, compared to prior analysis without it. The three strategies are implemented in our DIAlignR workflow (>2.3) and can be combined with linear, non-linear, or hybrid pairwise alignment.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Software , Proteins
3.
J Proteome Res ; 21(8): 1789-1799, 2022 08 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35877786

ABSTRACT

Mass spectrometry-based profiling of the phosphoproteome is a powerful method of identifying phosphorylation events at a systems level. Most phosphoproteomics studies have used data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mass spectrometry as their method of choice. In this Perspective, we review some recent studies benchmarking DDA and DIA methods for phosphoproteomics and discuss data analysis options for DIA phosphoproteomics. In order to evaluate the impact of data-dependent and data-independent acquisition (DIA) on identification and quantification, we analyze a previously published phosphopeptide-enriched data set consisting of 10 replicates acquired by DDA and DIA each. We find that though more unique identifications are made in DDA data, phosphopeptides are identified more consistently across replicates in DIA. We further discuss the challenges of identifying chromatographically coeluting phosphopeptide isomers and investigate the impact on reproducibility of identifying high-confidence site-localized phosphopeptides in replicates.


Subject(s)
Phosphopeptides , Proteomics , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Phosphopeptides/analysis , Proteome/analysis , Proteomics/methods , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...