Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Indian Med Assoc ; 112(2): 113-6, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25935969

ABSTRACT

Air travel has become so common these days that about one billion people travel in one year. A few number of the persons travelling by air have suffered or are suffering from one or more medical conditions which may increase risk to passenger himself. There may be additional risk to copassengers, crew of aircraft or safety of aircraft may be compromised. The present article evaluates different medical conditions from pregnancy to cardiovascular diseases in relation to the air travel.


Subject(s)
Aircraft , Health Status , Travel , Humans
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 283(6): 1409-13, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21431329

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the efficacy of different intervals of misoprostol administration (simultaneously vis-à-vis 24 h), after mifepristone, in women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy up to gestation of 49 days. METHODS: Eighty eligible women with single intrauterine pregnancy of ≤ 7 weeks of gestation requesting abortion were randomized to receive either 200 mg of mifepristone orally and 400 µg of misoprostol vaginally simultaneously (Group 1) or at 24-h interval (Group 2).Women who had no bleeding after the drugs were offered a second dose of misoprostol 24 h after the first dose. All patients were followed up on day 14. Primary outcome measure was the complete abortion rate. Secondary outcome measures were the induction-abortion interval, adverse effects, especially bleeding, and treatment acceptability rate. Treatment was considered a failure if surgical intervention was needed for any indication. RESULTS: Complete abortion was achieved in 38 women [95%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 88%, 100%] in Group 1 and 39 women (97.50%; 95% CI 93%,100%) in Group 2 (p = 0.56). A second dose of misoprostol was needed in two patients in Group 1 and in only one patient in Group 2. The induction-abortion interval was 6.50 ± 1.48 h in Group 1 and 5.95 ± 1.81 h in Group 2 (p = 0.13). The difference in frequency of adverse effects in the two groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.18). The treatment acceptability rate was 97.50% in Group 1 and 95% in Group 2 (p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous administration of mifepristone and 400 µg vaginal misoprostol is an effective alternative to standard regimens for medical abortion up to 49 days of gestation.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/administration & dosage , Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal/administration & dosage , Abortion, Eugenic/methods , Mifepristone/administration & dosage , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/adverse effects , Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal/adverse effects , Administration, Intravaginal , Administration, Oral , Adult , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Mifepristone/adverse effects , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Patient Satisfaction , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...