Propofol infusion syndrome & COVID-19 in a victim of multiple gunshot wounds: Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas.

Background: COVID-19 has become a global pandemic. It has affected patients the world over, and when minimally symptomatic, it can be an incidental finding in trauma patients. It may also make the diagnosis of other rare conditions more difficult due to clinical finding superimposition. Case presentation: A 23-year-old male was transferred to our Trauma Center in hemorrhagic shock after sustaining multiple gunshot wounds in the upper back. Imaging showed a retained projectile in the right pharyngeal area, a right upper lobe contusion, and a right hemopneumothorax; with additional infiltrates on both lungs suggestive of atelectasis. After intubation, a propofol infusion was started for sedation. Shortly thereafter worsening acidosis, refractory hypoxia, and hypotension with additional laboratory anomalies ensued, as the PCR screening for SARS-CoV-2 returned positive. The clinical findings suggested COVID-19 pneumonia with possible superimposed Propofol Infusion Syndrome. The drug was stopped, and the symptoms improved. Conclusion: A high index of suspicion is necessary to manage unusual pathologies and difficult differential diagnoses, and this is especially true during the ongoing pandemic.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Intra-Abdominal Irrigation during Emergency Trauma Laparotomy; Time for Yet Another Paradigm Shift.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal volume of abdominal irrigation that will prevent surgical site infections (both deep and superficial), eviscerations and fistula formations; and improve 30-day mortality in trauma patients. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm parallel clinical superiority randomized controlled trial comparing different volumes of effluent (5, 10 and 20 liters) used in trauma patients (both blunt and penetrating) age 14 and above undergoing an emergency laparotomy between April 2002 and July 2004 in a busy urban Level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: After randomization, a total of 204 patients were analyzed. All patient groups were comparable with respect to age, gender distribution, admission injury severity score, and mechanism of injury, estimated blood loss and degree of contamination. The mortality rate overall was 1.96% (4/204).No differences were noted with respect to contamination, wound infection, fistula formation, and evisceration. The twenty liter group (Group III) showed a trend toward an increased incidence of deep surgical site infections when compared to the five liter (Group I) (p=0.051) and ten liter (Group II) (p=0.057) groups. This did not however reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The old surgical adage "the solution to pollution is dilution" is not applicable to trauma patients. Our results suggest that using more irrigation, even when large amounts of contamination have occurred, does not reduce post-operative complications or affect mortality; and it may predispose patients to increased incidence of abscess formation. (Trial registration number: ISRCTN66454589).