ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Modified radical mastectomy is associated with appreciable blood loss, while endotracheal intubation leads to elevated hemodynamic responses. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine infusion as an anesthetic adjuvant to general anesthesia during modified radical mastectomy with I-Gel. METHODS: Sixty adult consenting female patients, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 2 and aged 4,065 years, were blindly randomized into two groups of 30 patients each. The patients in Group I received intravenous dexmedetomidine at a loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by maintenance infusion of 0.4 to 0.7 µg/kg/h, while patients in Group II were administered an identical amount of saline infusion until 15 min prior to the end of surgery. The primary end point was bleeding at the surgical field and hemodynamic changes; requirement of isoflurane, intraoperative fentanyl consumption and recovery time were assessed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The patients receiving dexmedetomidine infusion showed significantly less bleeding at the surgical field (P < 0.05). A statistically significant reduction was also observed in the percentage of isoflurane required (0.82 ± 0.80%) to maintain the systolic blood pressure between 100 and 110 mmHg in patients receiving dexmedetomidine infusion compared with the Group II (1.50 ± 0.90%). The mean intraoperative fentanyl consumption in patients in the Group I was also significantly lower compared with that of the Group II (38.43 ± 5.40 µg vs. 75.12 ± 4.60 µg). The mean recovery time from anesthesia did not show any clinically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine infusion can be used safely to decrease the bleeding at the surgical field with smooth recovery from anesthesia.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Preemptive analgesia is known modality to control the peri-operative pain. The present study was aimed to evaluate the effects of oral clonidine on subarachnoid block characteristics, hemodynamic changes, sedation and respiratory efficiency in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 64 adult consenting females of American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I and II were randomized double blindly into two groups of 32 patients each. Patients in the clonidine group received oral clonidine (100 µg) and patients of the control group received placebo capsule, 90 min before subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (3.5 ml). The onset of sensory and motor block, maximum cephalic sensory level and regression times of sensory and motor blockade were assessed. Intra-operative hemodynamic changes, respiratory efficiency, shoulder pain and sedation score were recorded. The other side-effects, if any were noted and managed. RESULTS: The onset of sensory blockade was earlier in patients of clonidine group with prolonged duration of analgesia (216.4 ± 23.3 min vs. 165.8 ± 37.2 min, P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed on motor blockade between groups. The hemodynamic parameters and respiratory efficiency were maintained within physiological limits in patients of clonidine group and no patient experienced shoulder pain. The Ramsey sedation score was 2.96 ± 0.75. In the control group, 17 patients experienced shoulder pain, which was effectively managed with small doses of ketamine and 15 patients required midazolam for anxiety. CONCLUSION: Premedication with oral clonidine (100 µg) has enhanced the onset and prolonged the duration of spinal analgesia, provided sedation with no respiratory depression. The hemodynamic parameters remained stabilized during the pneumoperitoneum.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting is commonly associated with adverse consequences and hamper the postoperative recovery in spite of the availability of many antiemetic drugs and regimens for its prevention. The study was aimed to compare the prophylactic effects of intravenously administered palonosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron on prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, double-blind study, comprised 120 adult consented patients of ASA grade I and II of either gender, was carried out after approval of Institutional Ethical Committee. Patients were randomized into three equal groups of 40 patients each in double-blind manner. Group P received inj. palonosetron (0.075 mg), group O received inj. ondansetron (4 mg), and group G received inj. granisetron (2 mg) intravenously five minutes before induction of anesthesia. The need for rescue antiemetic, episode of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and side effects were observed for 12 hours in the post-anesthesia care unit. At the end of study, results were compiled and statistical analysis was done by using ANOVA, Chi-square test, and Kruskal Wallis Test. Value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The incidence of nausea and vomiting was maximal during the first four hours postoperatively. The complete control of postoperative nausea and vomiting for first 12 hours was achieved in 30% patients of ondansetron group, 55% patients of granisetron group, and 90% patients of palonosetron group. Safety profile was more with palonosetron. CONCLUSION: Palonosetron was comparatively highly effective to prevent the PONV after anesthesia due to its prolonged duration of action than ondansetron and granisetron.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anesthetic management of elderly patients is a challenge as aging makes them more susceptible to hemodynamic fluctuations during regional anesthesia. This study was aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of epidural 0.75% ropivacaine fentanyl (RF)- with 0.5% bupivacaine-fentanyl (BF) for hemiarthroplasty in high-risk elderly patients. METHODS: Sixty elderly consented patients of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologist ASA II and III, scheduled for elective hemiarthroplasty were randomized into two Groups of 30 patients to receive epidural study solution of 15 mL of 0.75% Ropivacaine or 0.5% Bupivacaine with 1 mL fentanyl (50 µg). The hemodynamic variability with onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks were recorded. The adequacy and quality of surgical anesthesia were assessed. The post-epidural nausea and vomiting, shivering, respiratory parameters, or any other side effects were also recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference in the demographic profile between groups. The mean onset time to achieve sensory block to the T10 dermatome was rapid in the Group BF (12.4±6.9 vs. 17.5±3.7 min in Group RF). The mean time to achieve motor block was 17.5±3.4 min in Group BF versus 21.7±7.8 min in Group RF. The intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations showed statistically significant differences between groups. The pruritis was observed in five patients but post-epidural shivering, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, or urinary retention were not observed in any patient. CONCLUSION: Epidural 0.75% Ropivacaine with fentanyl showed better clinical profile as compared to 0.5% Bupivacaine with fentanyl for hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine has less systemic toxicity and greater differentiation of sensory and motor blockade after subarachnoid block. This study was aimed to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine alone or with fentanyl in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostrate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty four elderly consented patients of ASA grade I-III scheduled for transurethral resection of prostrate under the subarachnoid block were randomized to receive either intrathecal 4 mL of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine (Group R, n = 27) or 3.5 mL of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine with 0.5 mL (25 µg) of fentanyl (Group RF, n = 27). The characteristics of sensory and motor blockade, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and secondary effects were noted for evaluation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the demographic profile of patients. The surgical anesthesia was adequate for TURP surgery in all patients. The median time to achieve the sensory blockade at T10 dermatome was 3.2 ± 1.5 min in Group R and 3.5 ± 1.3 min in Group RF. The median duration of sensory blockade at T10 was 130.6 ± 10.2 min in Group R and 175.8 ± 8.6 min in Group RF. The median duration of complete motor block was significantly shorter than the duration of sensory blockade (P < 0.001). There were fewer episodes of manageable hypotension in 5 patients of Group R and 11 patients of Group RF. No secondary effects have occurred in any patients. CONCLUSION: The intrathecal 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine alone or with fentanyl has provided effective surgical anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostrate and hemodynamic stability in elderly patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient's awareness can be reduced during ultrasound guided nerve block for inguinal herniorraphy with propofol sedation. The study was aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of direct visualization of anatomy of inguinal region by ultrasound and benefits of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval, 40 adult male consented patients of ASA grade I-III of 18-58 years with body mass index <25 were randomized into two groups of 20 patients each. A high frequency (8-13 MHz) linear transducer was used to perform the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves (ILHN and ILIN) block between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. The propofol infusion rate for sedation in patients of group I (non-BIS) was managed clinically and in patients of group II (BIS) was managed with BIS index of 65-75. Any surgical or anesthetic complications were recorded. The two groups were compared by evaluating the propofol consumption during surgery. RESULTS: Ultrasonographic visualization of the ILHN and ILIN was possible in all patients and inguinal herniorraphy was performed uneventfully. The mean dose of propofol required for sedation was 5.45 mg/kg/h in patients of group I (non-BIS) while 4.92 mg/kg/h in patients of group II (BIS). The mean propofol consumption was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). All patients were hemodynamically stable and there was no respiratory depression during propofol sedation. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography has facilitated the clinically effective nerve block for inguinal herniorraphy and BIS monitoring has ensured amnesia and faster emergence.
