ABSTRACT
The disruptive effect of firearm missiles on body tissues depends on many factors. However, it mainly relates to the bullet's physical and dynamic properties and tissue-related factors. We encountered an unusual case of a gunshot injury wherein the bullet traversed the neck with an upward and non-linear trajectory with an exit from the contralateral side of the neck without damaging any vital neck organs. A 26-year-old male presented with a gunshot wound to the chin from close range. A bullet entry hole was observed on the right side of the chin, encircled by the abrasion collar, with tattoo marks around the area. The patient was conscious, with normal vital signs and no injury to the cranial nerves or aerodigestive tract. The CT imaging of the patient revealed the injury tract traversing through the muscles of the floor of the mouth to involve the left carotid and left parapharyngeal space, along with the left sternocleidomastoid muscle, with an exit hole below the left mastoid in the posterior triangle of the neck. A bullet usually travels through the body in a straight line or pathway; however, its non-linear trajectories depend on the projectile's dynamics and its interaction with the body tissues. The present case emphasizes understanding wound ballistics to know the erratic bullet trajectories in the victim's body and their interpretation, irrespective of their entry site.
ABSTRACT
Background This study is intended to compare the Indian system of inquests, which is conducted by nonscientific people like police and magistrate (who are compulsorily neither qualified in science nor in law), and the medical examiner system of the USA which is done by doctors specialized in forensic medicine/pathology. Aims The goal of this study was to see if bringing in a medical examiner system makes a difference in determining the cause, manner, and time of death as compared to the current system of conducting inquests and autopsies by two different agencies, namely, the police and forensic medicine experts. Material and methods In the present study, a peculiar case (in which the police were clueless and the autopsy surgeon was confused during the autopsy) was chosen for getting an expert opinion from 50 forensic medicine experts from different parts of the country in which police were not clear regarding cause, manner and time of death, but later after a crime scene visit by forensic medicine experts who had conducted the autopsy, it was clarified. Opinion regarding the cause, manner, and time since death was taken from 50 medico-legal experts in two steps. In the first step, only the autopsy finding and history obtained from police were provided and in the second step, additional information obtained from the crime scene visit by forensic medicine experts was provided. The sampling method was purposive sampling. Result In the cause of death, Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.30% (z-statistic = 3.87, p-value = 0.0001), indicating a significantly low agreement between the first and second steps by the experts, as their decision changed after getting the evidence of the crime scene visit. In the manner of death, Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.06% (z-statistic = 0.66, p-value = 0.2540) indicating a very low agreement between the first and second opinions by the experts as their decision regarding the suspected manner of death changed drastically after getting the evidence of crime scene. In the time since death, Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.5531% (z-statistic = 7.25, p-value = 0.0001), which also indicates significant difference. Conclusion Therefore, in this study, the usefulness of the medical examiner system in the Indian setting has been proved beyond doubt expecting drastic improvement in criminal investigation by introducing the medical examiner system in India.
