ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID associated mucormycosis is a challenging problem with significant morbidity and mortality implications. COVID affliction, pre-existing medical conditions especially diabetes and steroid prescription are supposed contributors for development of this opportunistic fungal infection. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment with adequate post-op anti-fungal therapy. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of all surgical patients between March-May 2021 at a single centre. Prognosticators such as severity of COVID affliction, use of steroids, extent of rhino-orbital mucormycosis, extent of surgery and outcomes were studied. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse frequency of different variables and chi square test was used to analyse prognostic factors. P value < 0.05 were deemed significant. Results: 74 patients with an average 30 day follow-up were included. All patients had preceding COVID infection and 71.6% were diabetic and 25.7% were diagnosed during the course of their COVID treatment. Multiple sinus involvement being most common (52.61%), 10.81% underwent orbital exenteration and 24.32% palatectomies were performed. Revision surgeries were warranted in 16.21% patients. 9 patients succumbed to disease/ underlying medical and treatment related complications. Conclusion: We propose a risk assessment based on general condition of patient and severity of mucormycosis infection to decide appropriate strategy for surgical intervention. Early detection and timely and adequate surgery are essential pre-requisites to good outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-021-02692-9.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections reporting has financial implications for institutions under Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Pay-for-Performance programs. Surgical Wound Classification (SWC) is an important factor in performing risk adjustment and affects the accuracy of the Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR). This in turn leads to more accurate inter-hospital ratings and reimbursement. This study aims to measure (1) services and procedures associated with the highest rates of misclassification and (2) whether temporal factors influenced misclassification. METHODS: Accuracy of SWC was assessed by comparing the wound classification documented by the Operating Room (OR) nurse at the time of the operation to the actual SWC determined from in-depth chart review using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) wound classification algorithm by a trained reviewer. Cases were reviewed once operative reports were available. RESULTS: Review of 3954 cases yielded an overall discordance rate of 22.15% (N = 876), with most cases being under-classified. Services with the highest rates of discordance include cardiothoracic (38.46%) and general surgery (37.86%), followed by general oncology (29.46%), OB-GYN (28.93%), urology (27.27%), and plastic surgery (27.14%). Procedures with the highest discordance rates are laparoscopic appendectomy (66.67%), cholecystectomy (52.90%), exploratory laparotomy (49.21%), and split-thickness skin graft (36.84%). Discordance rates were significantly higher (p = 0.0001) during weekends compared to weekdays, while operations starting after-hours during the week did not show a significant difference from daytime hours. CONCLUSION: At a level 1 trauma academic medical center, certain procedures were found to be misclassified in regards to SWC more often than other types of cases. The timing of the case, such that they occurred on the weekends also contributed to higher discordance rates between original and corrected wound classifications. Recognizing cases, services, and temporal factors frequently associated with misclassification of wound class can help allocate limited resources to maximize improvement of this important metric.
