The effect of under-treatment of breast cancer in women 80 years of age and older.

BACKGROUND: Several authors have demonstrated a trend toward the under-treatment of elderly and very elderly women with breast cancer. This study was undertaken to determine the impact of under-treatment of breast cancer in women age 80 and older. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients 80 years and older with a newly diagnosed breast cancer at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, between September 1, 1989 and September 1, 2004 was performed. Data extracted from charts included patient demographics, comorbidity, treatments recommended, treatments received, complications of therapy, disease recurrence and disease related death. Treatments undertaken were analyzed in the context of accepted therapy at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Two hundred twelve patients were identified. The median age was 83.5 years (range 80-97). Overall survival in the entire cohort was 7.28 years with a median follow up of 4 years for patients still alive at the end of the study period. Fifty seven percent of patients were under-treated according to institutional and national guidelines. Women who underwent hormonal therapy only demonstrated decreased disease specific survival (P<0.001 respectively) compared with patients who received multi-modality therapy. Women who underwent partial mastectomy without radiation treatment experienced a significant increase in local regional recurrence (P=0.045). There was an association of increased disease specific survival in patients who had surgical lymph node evaluation compared to those who did not (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are compromised in very elderly women with breast cancer in whom less than complete combined modality treatment is undertaken. With the previously demonstrated safety of radiation therapy, hormonal therapy and surgery in the very elderly population, multi-modality therapy should not be routinely withheld in patients in this age category.

Expression of ERalpha and ERbeta in lobular carcinoma in situ.

AIMS: Oestrogen is a modulator of cell growth and differentiation in the breast. It mediates most of its function through members of the oestrogen receptor (ER) family, ERalpha and ERbeta. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a known risk factor for the development of breast cancer; however, the use of tamoxifen for prevention is based upon data for ER+ (ERalpha) LCIS associated with invasion, but limited data exist on the use of tamoxifen in cases of ER+ (ERalpha) LCIS occurring in the absence of invasive carcinoma. The aim of this study was to examine ER expression in LCIS to determine the relationship of ERalpha to ERbeta and, thereby, to determine whether it is of clinical value to measure ERbeta along with ERalpha. METHODS AND RESULTS: Core biopsy specimens from 50 patients were examined retrospectively. Histology was reviewed and histological parameters were assessed. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was available for E-cadherin, ERalpha and ERbeta immunohistochemistry. The degree of ERalpha and ERbeta nuclear reactivity was quantified. The patients' mean age was 55 years. The mean follow-up duration was 48 months. All 50 cases of LCIS were E-cadherin-negative. All cases were ERalpha+ and ERbeta+. The staining intensity of ERbeta was strong and included staining of periductal stromal cells. The median percentage of cells immunoreactive for ERalpha was 75% and for ERbeta 70% (range 10% weak positive to 100% strong positive). There was a statistically significant relationship between ERbeta staining intensity and incidence of ipsilateral breast cancer (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The presence and intensity of both stromal and glandular ERbeta immunoreactivity suggest that the action of oestrogen on LCIS is on both stromal and glandular cells. Future studies are needed to determine whether the presence of ERbeta in LCIS could be targeted to influence the treatment of this disease and perhaps alter its natural history.

Breast cancer surgery for the 21st century: the continuing evolution of minimally invasive treatments.

Since the 1950s, breast cancer surgery has been moving towards less invasive approaches for managing breast cancer, with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and breast conservation therapy (BCT) now representing the standard of care for the majority of patients. Even as the use of SLNB is expanding to include patient groups that were previously thought to be poor candidates, questions remain about the optimal management of patients who are clinically node-negative but SLN-positive, since more than half of these patients will prove to be pathologically node-negative. Various approaches are being developed to identify and treat those SLN-positive patients who are likely to have additional positive lymph nodes. The clinical significance of microscopic lesions in the SLN detected by immunohistochemistry continues to be debated--current standards recommend that isolated tumor cells (lesions no larger than 0.2 mm) be classified as pN0--but a definitive answer to this question awaits the completion of further studies. The unresolved questions about the best use of SLNB could become irrelevant with the ongoing development of new molecular prognostic indicators that may replace axillary lymph node status. Similarly, researchers are exploring ways of replacing BCT with ablation techniques that can remove the primary tumor without surgery. Although radiofrequency ablation, focused ultrasound, cryosurgery, and other approaches have captured the imagination of patients and clinicians alike, many technical difficulties remain. Among the most significant of these is the lack of truly precise imaging to locate tumors, estimate their true size, and follow treatment in real-time. These deficits may be filled by future developments in functional imaging (e.g., positron emission tomography) and nanobiotechnology.

Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the volume of tissue excised and the number of breast operations in patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative chemotherapy is increasingly being used for breast cancer and increases rates of BCT. Its impact on the extent of surgery and the number of surgical procedures in BCT has never been fully defined. The extent of surgery in BCT directly affects cosmesis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 509 consecutive patients with T1-T3, N0-N2 breast cancer who were treated in prospective randomized clinical trials of chemotherapy between 1998 and 2005. We analyzed the final surgical procedure (BCT or mastectomy), the number of operations, and, in patients who underwent BCT, re-excision rates, and the total volume of breast tissue excised [4Pi/3(width/2 x length/2 x height/2)]. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients underwent BCT, and 268 patients underwent mastectomy. Among BCT patients who had initial tumor size >2.0 cm, patients who received preoperative chemotherapy had significantly smaller volumes of breast tissue excised compared with patients who received postoperative chemotherapy (113 cm vs. 213 cm, P = 0.004). The re-excision rate and total number of breast operations did not significantly differ between the groups. Among BCT patients who had initial tumor size < or = 2 cm, preoperative chemotherapy had no impact on volume of breast tissue excised, re-excision rate, or number of breast operations (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with BCT for larger breast tumors, patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy have less extensive resection, with no change in rates of re-excision.

New approaches to surgery for breast cancer.

The surgical management of breast cancer is rapidly evolving towards less invasive procedures. Alternative biopsy techniques, including fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy, are replacing excisional biopsy as the treatment standard. Breast conservation therapy is now widely used in place of mastectomy, both for small tumors and for larger tumors that have been downstaged through induction chemotherapy. Less invasive procedures for axillary treatment such as lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph-node biopsy are being explored in an effort to avoid the morbidity associated with axillary lymph-node dissection. For women who still prefer or need to receive a mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction with autologous tissue provides an excellent cosmetic outcome that is oncologically sound. This is especially appealing to high-risk women who opt to have a prophylactic mastectomy. High-risk women are also being offered the option of receiving chemopreventive treatment that may reduce their lifetime risk of cancer by almost 50%. These new, less invasive approaches require the close cooperation of a team of physicians,including surgeons, pathologists, radiologists, and medical and radiation oncologists.

Sensitivity to benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide associated with risk of breast cancer in young women and modulation by glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms: a case-control study.

Mounting epidemiological evidence suggests that smoking may play a role in the etiology of breast cancer. Because smoking-related DNA adducts are detectable in both normal and malignant breast tissues, we hypothesized that breast cancer patients may be sensitive to tobacco-induced carcinogenesis, and this sensitivity could be modulated by variants of metabolic genes. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide (BPDE)-induced mutagen sensitivity and polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in a pilot case-control study of breast cancer. Short-term cell cultures were established from blood samples of 100 female breast cancer patients and 105 healthy controls. After 5 h of in vitro exposure to 4 microM of BPDE, we harvested the lymphocytes for cytogenetic evaluation and recorded and compared the frequency of BPDE-induced chromatid breaks between cases and controls. We used a multiplex PCR-based assay to simultaneously detect polymorphisms of GSTM1 and GSTT1 from genomic DNA. We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cases had a significantly higher frequency of chromatid breaks than did controls (P < 0.0001). The level of chromatid breaks greater than the median value of controls was associated with a >3-fold increased risk of breast cancer [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.72-5.64]. The risk was more pronounced in those who were < 45 years (ORadj = 4.79; 95% CI = 1.87-12.3), ever-smokers (ORadj = 5.55; 95% CI = 1.85-16.6), alcohol drinkers (ORadj = 4.64; 95% CI = 1.70-12.7), and those who had the GSTT1 null variant (ORadj = 8.01; 95% CI = 1.16-55.3). These data suggest that sensitivity to BPDE-induced chromosomal aberrations may contribute to the risk of developing breast cancer, and such sensitivity may be modulated by both genetic and environmental factors. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

DOC-2/hDab-2 inhibits ILK activity and induces anoikis in breast cancer cells through an Akt-independent pathway.

DOC-2/hDab-2 was identified due to the loss of its expression in primary ovarian cancer cells. It is believed that loss of DOC-2/hDab-2 expression is one of the early events of ovarian malignancy. These results suggest a function of DOC-2/hDab-2 as a tumor suppressor. However, it is not clear how DOC-2/hDab-2 negatively regulates cancer cell growth. In this report, we demonstrate that DOC-2/hDab-2 expression in breast cancer cells resulted in sensitivity to suspension-induced cell death (anoikis). This event was associated with the down-regulation of the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) activity. Since ILK is a key factor in regulating the cellular signaling in responding to the extracellular signals through adhesion molecules like integrins, our results indicate that DOC-2/hDab-2 may prevent tumor growth and invasion by modulating the anti-apoptotic ILK pathway.

Factors predictive of outcome in patients with breast cancer refractory to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical, pathological, and treatment factors that are predictive of local-regional recurrence and overall survival for patients with breast cancer that is refractory to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed the data of the 177 breast cancer patients treated on our institutional protocols who had less than a partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The initial clinical stage of disease was II in 27%, III in 69%, and IV (supraclavicular lymph node involvement) in 4%. Surgery was performed in 94% of the patients, and 77% of these patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 106 patients experienced disease recurrence, with 98 of these having distant metastases and 45 having local-regional recurrence. The 5- and 10-year overall survivals for the entire group were 56% and 33%, respectively. The factors that were independently associated with a statistically significant poorer overall survival in a Cox regression analysis were pathologically involved lymph nodes after surgery, estrogen receptor-negative disease, and progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival for patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes ranged from 84% (estrogen receptor-positive disease) to 75% (estrogen re-ceptor-negative disease), compared with rates for patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes of 66% (estrogen receptor-positive disease) and 40% (estrogen receptor-negative disease). The 5-year survival of patients with progressive disease was only 19%. The 5- and 10-year local-regional recurrence rates for the 177 patients were 27% and 34%, respectively. Significant factors on Cox analysis that predicted for local-regional recurrence were four or more pathologically involved lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-negative disease. For the 105 patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy, the 10-year local-regional recurrence rates for the subgroups with 0, 1, or 2 of these factors were 12%, 25%, and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, conventional treatments achieve reasonable outcomes in those with lymph node-negative disease or estrogen receptor-positive disease. However, more active systemic and local therapies are needed for patients with estrogen receptor-negative disease and positive lymph nodes and for those with clinical evidence of progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II and III breast cancer.

The current attractiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy lies in its ability to downstage both the primary tumor and the axilla, making many patients good candidates for breast-conserving surgical techniques. This has been an important achievement in a patient group whose tumors are often considered inoperable. Attention has more recently turned to the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable tumors. In patients with resectable stage II and III breast tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to provide effective downstaging of the primary tumor, and subsequent breast-conserving surgery results in excellent local control. In addition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to downstage axillary lymph nodes from positive to negative in a significant number of cases. This raises the question of whether patients who have clinically negative axillae after neoadjuvant chemotherapy need to risk the morbidity associated with axillary lymph node dissection. Axillary irradiation may provide adequate regional control in patients who are clinically node negative. In addition, sentinel lymph node dissection has been shown to provide accurate assessment of the axilla in patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An important ramification of the concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is that surgery that takes place after the completion of systemic therapy can become minimally invasive, accomplished in an outpatient setting without the need for an operating room suite.

Anaphylactic reactions to isosulfan blue dye during sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an alternative to axillary dissection for many breast cancer patients. Cases of anaphylactic reaction to the isosulfan blue dye used during SLNB have recently been reported. No study on the incidence of serious anaphylactic reactions during SLNB for breast cancer has been reported. METHODS: We reviewed 639 consecutive SLNBs for breast cancer performed at our institution. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed using both isosulfan blue dye and technetium-99m sulfur colloid. Cases of anaphylaxis were reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Overall, 1.1% of patients had severe anaphylactic reactions to isosulfan blue requiring vigorous resuscitation. No deaths or permanent disability occurred. In patients with anaphylaxis, hospital stay was prolonged by a mean of 1.6 days. In 1 patient, the anaphylactic reaction required termination of the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt recognition and aggressive treatment of anaphylactic reactions to isosulfan blue are critical to prevent an adverse outcome. Lymphatic mapping with blue dye should be performed in a setting where personnel are trained to recognize and treat anaphylaxis.

Image-guided surgery of small breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Widespread screening mammography has resulted in detection of many breast cancers smaller than one cm. Image-guided percutaneous needle sampling provides accurate diagnostic and prognostic information for adjuvant therapy. Less invasive methods based on imaging techniques are emerging as an alternative to wire localization and lumpectomy. DATA SOURCES: Information presented in this overview was provided by seven investigators from five medical centers in the United States. These researchers are currently developing various techniques of image-guided percutaneous therapy of small (Tis, 1) breast cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Several percutaneous treatment modalities for treatment of early breast cancer, either excisional or in-situ ablative, are described in this overview and their potential applications are discussed.

Breast conservation therapy as a treatment option for the elderly. The M. D. Anderson experience.

BACKGROUND: Although almost half of all incidents of breast carcinoma occur in women age > or = 65 years, not enough is known about appropriate care for patients in this age group. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the role of breast conservation therapy in the management of breast carcinoma in women age > or = 65 years. METHODS: From 1970 to 1994, 1325 patients with carcinoma of the breast were treated with breast conservation therapy (segmental mastectomy and radiation therapy with or without axillary lymph node dissection) at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. From this patient group, the authors identified 184 elderly women (> or = 65 years) with Stage 0-III disease at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: The median patient age was 70 years (range, 65-88 years). The distribution of disease by stage among the women was Stage 0 disease in 12 patients (7%), Stage I disease in 107 patients (58%), Stage II disease in 63 patients (34%), and Stage III disease in 2 patients (1%). Comorbid conditions that may have influenced treatment planning were reported in 91 patients (50%). An axillary lymph node dissection was performed in 135 patients (73%), with positive axillary lymph nodes found in 30 patients (22%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 10 patients (5%), and tamoxifen therapy was given to 63 patients (34%). Complications from treatment were reported in 24 patients (13%). With a median follow-up of 7.3 years (range, 0.25-23.5 years), 9 patients developed locoregional disease recurrence (5%), 10 patients developed contralateral breast carcinoma (5%), and 21 patients developed distant metastasis (11%). At last follow-up, 113 patients (61%) were alive, 15 patients (8%) were dead of disease, and 56 patients (30%) were dead of other causes. The 5-year and 10-year disease specific survival rates were 96% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Breast conservation therapy with segmental mastectomy and postoperative radiation therapy with or without axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent local control and disease free survival in elderly women with breast carcinoma. This treatment should be considered as the standard of care for elderly patients without severe comorbid disease.

Reconstructive management of contralateral breast cancer in patients who previously underwent unilateral breast reconstruction.

When a patient who has had unilateral breast reconstruction presents with a new cancer on the opposite side, the reconstructive management of the second breast can be unclear. This study was performed to determine whether reconstruction of the second breast is oncologically reasonable and to evaluate the reconstructive options available to these patients. Patients who had mastectomy with unilateral breast reconstruction between 1988 and 1994 and who had a minimal follow-up of 5 years from the initial breast cancer were reviewed. Of 469 patients reviewed, 18 patients (4 percent) were identified who developed contralateral breast cancer. Mean age at the initial breast cancer presentation was 43 years (range, 26 to 57 years), and mean age at presentation with contralateral breast cancer was 48 years (range, 36 to 67). The mean interval between the initial and contralateral breast cancer presentations was 5 years (range, 1 to 10 years). Mean follow-up from the time of contralateral breast cancer was 5 years (range, 1 to 9 years). In most cases, contralateral breast cancer presented at an early stage (13 of 18 patients; 72 percent), and a shift to an earlier stage at presentation of the contralateral cancer was evident compared with the initial breast cancer. Of the 18 patients who developed contralateral breast cancer, 16 (89 percent) had no evidence of disease, one was alive with disease, and one died. Reconstructive management after the initial mastectomy included 16 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (seven free and nine pedicled), one latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with implant, and one superior gluteal free flap. Surgical management of the second breast after contralateral breast cancer included breast conservation in two patients, mastectomy without reconstruction in four, and mastectomy with reconstruction in 12. Reconstruction of the second breast included one free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, three extended latissimus dorsi flaps, two latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps with implants, three implants alone, two Rubens flaps, and one superior gluteal free flap. No major complications were noted after the reconstruction of the second breast. The best symmetry was obtained when similar methods and tissues were used on both sides. The incidence of contralateral breast cancer after mastectomy and unilateral breast reconstruction is low. In most cases, contralateral breast cancer presents at an earlier stage compared with the initial breast cancer, and the prognosis is good. In patients who develop a contralateral breast cancer after mastectomy and unilateral breast reconstruction, the reconstruction of the second breast after mastectomy is oncologically reasonable and should be offered to provide optimal breast symmetry and a better quality of life. The best result is obtained when similar methods and tissues are used on both sides.

Minimally invasive techniques in breast cancer treatment.

Breast conservation therapy has largely replaced mastectomy as the surgical treatment of choice for early-stage breast cancer. As the sentinel lymph node mapping procedure, rather than routine axillary node dissection, becomes the standard of care, the next challenge is how to treat the primary tumor without surgery. Minimally invasive ablation of the primary tumor is possible with a variety of approaches; the goal is to either excise the tumor percutaneously or cool it (with cryotherapy) or heat it (with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), focused ultrasound, or laser interstitial therapy) sufficiently to cause complete cell death. These developing technologies may provide treatment options that are psychologically and cosmetically more acceptable to the patient than traditional therapies, but they need further investigation to prove that they are oncologically sound. This new frontier of surgery without scalpels will require surgeons to develop radiologic expertise and to acquire a basic understanding of molecular biology.

Adverse prognostic significance of infraclavicular lymph nodes detected by ultrasonography in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is increasingly used to evaluate the nodal status of breast cancer patients and specialized positioning permits assessment of the infraclavicular fossa. However, the incidence and significance of infraclavicular (level III) adenopathy detected sonographically in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) has not been defined. METHODS: The study population consisted of 146 LABC patients registered in a prospective trial of induction chemotherapy between 1991 and 1996. All patients underwent ultrasound imaging before and after chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 32 months. RESULTS: Forty-two of 146 patients (29%) had suspicious infraclavicular adenopathy; all 42 had additional positive axillary lymph nodes by ultrasound. Disease-free and overall survival for the patients with suspicious infraclavicular adenopathy was significantly worse compared with patients without this feature; disease-free survival 50% versus 68% (P = 0.112); overall survival 58% versus 83% (P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of LABC patients will have infraclavicular lymph node involvement by ultrasound imaging; this finding is a significant adverse prognostic feature, and we recommend that infraclavicular nodal evaluation become a routine component of the sonographic workup of breast cancer patients, particularly if lower axillary lymph nodes appear involved.

The influence of pathologic tumor characteristics on locoregional recurrence rates following mastectomy.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of pathologic factors other than tumor size and number of involved axillary nodes on the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) following mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 1031 patients treated with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without radiation on 5 prospective clinical trials. Median follow-up was 116 months (range, 6-262 months). RESULTS: Patients with gross multicentric disease were at increased risk of LRR (37% at 10 years). However, patients with multifocal disease and those with microscopic multicentric disease did not experience higher rates of LRR than those with single lesions (17% at 10 years). Patients with lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) or involvement of the skin or nipple also experienced high rates of LRR (25%, 32%, and 50%, respectively). The presence of close (<5 mm) or positive margins was associated with an increased risk of LRR (45%). The increased risk of LRR observed for patients with pectoral fascial invasion (33%) was not reduced when negative deep margins were obtained. On multivariate analysis, the presence of 4 or more involved axillary nodes, tumor size of greater than 5 cm, close or positive surgical margins, and gross multicentric disease were found to be independent predictors of LRR (all, p < 0.01). In a separate analysis including only patients with 1-3 involved axillary nodes, microscopic invasion of the skin or nipple, pectoral fascial invasion, and the presence of close or positive margins were significant predictors of LRR. CONCLUSION: In addition to the extent of primary and nodal disease, other factors that predict for high rates of LRR include the presence of LVSI, involvement of the skin, nipple or pectoral fascia, close or positive margins, or gross multicentric disease. These factors predict for high LRR rates regardless of the number of involved axillary nodes.

Biologic basis and evolving role of aromatase inhibitors in the management of invasive carcinoma of the breast.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The most powerful predictor of the response of breast cancers to hormonal therapy is the presence of estrogen receptors in the tumor cells. Estrogen receptors are expressed in approximately 35-55% of all breast tumors but up to 80-90% of tumors from women older than 55 years. METHODS: At this time, tamoxifen remains the first-line hormonal therapy for breast cancer of all stages. However, the aromatase inhibitors are evolving into an important treatment option. Aromatase inhibitors prevent the conversion of precursors (androgens) to estrogens. RESULTS: On the basis of several randomized clinical trials, aromatase inhibitors have become established as the second-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing during tamoxifen therapy. Furthermore, very recent trials support the use of these agents as first-line therapy in place of tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: The roles of the selective aromatase inhibitors in the prevention of breast cancer and in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer are the focus of several planned and ongoing large-scale clinical trials. These trials will answer some of the many questions that remain regarding optimal hormonal therapy for hormone-dependent breast cancer.

Feasibility of breast preservation in the treatment of occult primary carcinoma presenting with axillary metastases.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with occult primary carcinoma with axillary lymph node metastasis who were treated with mastectomy or with intent to preserve the breast. METHODS: From 1951 to 1998, 479 female patients were registered with axillary lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary. After clinical workup, including mammography, 45 patients retained this diagnosis and received treatment for T0 N1-2 M0 carcinoma of the breast. Clinical and pathological data were collected retrospectively, and survival was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up time was 7 years. RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (range, 32-79). Clinical nodal status was N1 in 71% and N2 in 29% of the patients. Surgical treatment was mastectomy in 29% and an intent to preserve the breast in 71% of the patients. Locoregional radiotherapy was used in 71% and systemic chemoendocrine therapy was used in 73% of the patients. Of the 13 mastectomy patients, only one had a primary tumor discovered in the specimen. Two patients (4%) were ultimately diagnosed with lung cancer and neuroendocrine tumor. No significant difference was detected between mastectomy and breast preservation in locoregional recurrence (15% versus 13%), distant metastases (31% versus 22%), or 5-year survival (75% vs. 79%). Regardless of surgical therapy, the most important determinant of survival was the number of positive nodes. Five-year overall survival was 87% with 1-3 positive nodes compared with 42% with > or =4 positive nodes (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Occult primary carcinoma with axillary metastases can be treated with preservation of the breast without a negative impact on local control or survival.

A case-control study of unilateral and bilateral breast carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Women with unilateral breast carcinoma are at increased risk for developing contralateral disease. The clinical significance of bilateral breast carcinoma has not been fully defined, and the subset of patients who may benefit from medical or surgical risk-reduction intervention has not yet been characterized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors and outcomes for bilateral breast carcinoma. METHODS: A subject group of 70 bilateral breast carcinoma patients (62% metachronous) was matched by age and survival interval with a control group of 70 unilateral breast carcinoma patients. Median follow-up was 103 months. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of the unilateral patients and 80% of the bilateral patients had Stage I or II disease at diagnosis. Median age at presentation was 53 years. In the bilateral group, the contralateral cancer was diagnosed at the same or earlier stage than the first cancer in 87% of cases. Bilateral patients were significantly more likely to have multicentric disease and to have a positive family history for breast carcinoma compared with the unilateral group. There were no significant differences regarding history of exogenous hormone exposure, lobular histology, hormone-receptor status, or HER-2/neu expression. Five-year disease-free survival was 94% for the unilateral breast carcinoma patients and 91% for the bilateral breast carcinoma patients (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Survival for patients with bilateral breast carcinoma is similar to that of patients with unilateral disease; however, prophylactic risk-reduction intervention for the contralateral breast should be considered in patients who have multicentric unilateral disease or a positive family history for breast carcinoma.