Endoscopic Repair of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears: A Case Report.

Introduction: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome is a common incapacitating hip condition characterized by chronic lateral hip pain. This condition includes a range of pathologies ranging from trochanteric bursitis, hip abductor pathology involving the gluteus medius and minimum, external coxa saltans (snapping hip syndrome), or combinations of these. Hip abductor tendon tears have gained recognition as a main contributor to this condition. This pathology is often misdiagnosed and left untreated because of the frequency of partial-thickness undersurface tears. Once this challenging diagnosis is confirmed, non-operative treatments are considered the first therapeutic approach. Despite the availability and effectiveness of multiple non-operative therapies, a considerable percentage of patients will present with chronic disabling pain and refractory symptoms. Many health-care providers are unaware of accessible advanced surgical techniques that benefit patients unresponsive to conservative management. Case Report: We present the case of a 51-year-old female patient with chronic lateral hip pain refractory to conservative treatment for more than two years, treated successfully with endoscopic abductor tendon repair. The patient returned to the desired activities six months following surgery without any reported complications. Patient's pre-operative reported outcomes utilizing the MHOT-14 and Vail hip scores improved from 27 to 79 points (on a scale of 0-100) and from 30 to 56 points (on a scale of 0-100), respectively, at eight months follow-up. Conclusion: This case report is illustrative of endoscopic surgical repair of the hip abductor tendons in the setting of a chronic full-thickness abductor tendon tear in a female patient after failure of conservative management. The multiple advantages of the technique include performance in an ambulatory day surgery center, soft-tissue preservation, and fewer complications compared to other open techniques. Knowledge of this pathology and its state-of-the-art available treatments is relevant for orthopedic surgeons and a wide range of health providers who encounter patients with chronic lateral hip pain.

Effects of Limb Dominance on Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Gait at 12 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: Patellofemoral joint complications have commonly been reported in long-term outcome studies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the biomechanics in the early phases of rehabilitation that could be associated with the development of these abnormalities is unclear. Limb dominance may affect the biomechanics of the knee joint in patients after ACLR. Purpose: To compare knee joint loading between surgical and nonsurgical limbs at 12 weeks postoperatively in patients who underwent ACLR on either their dominant limb (ACL-D) or nondominant limb (ACL-ND). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Included were 54 patients (32 ACL-D and 22 ACL-ND). Peak and integrated patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS), peak patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), and peak knee extension moment (KEM) were assessed during the stance phase of gait while participants walked on a 10-m runway at a self-selected speed. Results: The surgical limb of the ACL-D group had significantly decreased peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P < .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. The surgical limb of the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly increased peak PFJS (P = .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P < .001), and peak KEM (P = .001) compared to the nonsurgical limb. For the surgical limb, the ACL-ND group demonstrated significantly greater peak PFJS (P < .001), peak PFJRF (P < .001) , (PFJRF [P<.001]) and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-D group. For the nonsurgical limb, the ACL-D group demonstrated greater peak PFJS (P < .001), integrated PFJS (P = .023), peak PFJRF (P = .003), and peak KEM (P < .001) than the ACL-ND group. Conclusion: Significantly larger knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-ND group and smaller knee joint loading on the surgical limb of the ACL-D group were observed compared to the contralateral nonsurgical limb, which suggests that limb dominance has a key role in loading at the knee joint during gait. Clinical Relevance: Altered knee joint loading during gait at 12 weeks after ACLR may lead to the development of patellofemoral joint abnormalities.

Corrigendum to: 'Mini-Max' knotless acetabular labrum repair: repair construct rationale and allocation in a consecutive case series with minimum 1-year clinical outcomes.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnab061.].

Adolescent Athletes Demonstrate Inferior Objective Profiles at the Time of Return to Sport After ACLR Compared With Healthy Controls.

BACKGROUND: Athletes display persistent muscle deficits and altered limb-loading mechanics at the time of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE: To compare an objective profile of adolescent athletes at RTS after ACLR to matched healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included were 124 participants; 62 patients who underwent ACLR (15.4 ± 1.7 years) and 62 healthy controls (15.3 ± 1.7 years). Motion capture and force plates were used to capture joint motions during jump landing (JL) and single-limb squat (SLS) tasks. Energy absorption contribution (EAC) was calculated, and repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess for EAC differences between groups. Participants completed an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, and isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength testing was performed on each limb. Independent t tests were run to examine age, height, weight, and IKDC scores as well as compare differences between groups for quadriceps and hamstring strength. RESULTS: A significant group × joint interaction was found for JL (P < .001) and SLS (P < .001). For JL, patients who underwent ACLR utilized significantly greater hip (P < .001) and significantly less knee (P < .001) EAC on the surgical limb compared with controls. During SLS, patients who underwent ACLR utilized significantly greater hip (P < .001) and significantly less knee (P < .001) EAC on the surgical limb compared with controls. The ACLR cohort demonstrated lower IKDC scores (P < .001) and significantly lower quadriceps strength on the surgical limb (P < .001) than controls. There were no differences in surgical limb hamstring strength between the ACLR cohort and healthy controls (P = .701). CONCLUSION: Compared with matched healthy controls, the participants who underwent ACLR in this study demonstrated an inferior objective profile at RTS, consisting of deficits in surgical limb loading, self-reported outcomes, and strength.

'Mini-Max' knotless acetabular labrum repair: repair construct rationale and allocation in a consecutive case series with minimum 1-year clinical outcomes.

To describe the 'mini-Max' approach to labrum repair using non-absorbable 2.4-mm knotless suture anchors and report objective clinical outcomes with a large single-surgeon cohort. Level 3 retrospective case series. A retrospective review was conducted to report the use and allocation of non-absorbable 2.4-mm knotless suture anchors during 'mini-Max' labral repair from 2015 to 2018. Descriptive analysis of the labral damage severity, size and number of anchors used to arthroscopically repair the acetabular labrum was performed. Paired-samples t-tests were performed to evaluate whether preoperative and 1-year follow-up patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were statistically significant. An analysis of variance was performed comparing PROs with categorized number of labral anchors. A total of 390 patients were queried in this study, with 330 (85%) diagnosed intraoperatively with acetabular labral tears. A total of 245 patients (137 females and 108 males) with a mean age of 30.1 ± 11.6 years (mean ± SD) at the time of surgery underwent 'mini-Max' labral refixation. Of the 245 labral tears, 88 (35.9%) were graded as mild, 113 (46.1%) as moderate and 44 (18.0%) as severe. Labral repairs required an average of 2.1 ± 0.67 anchors across all patients included. Forty-one repairs (16.7%) required one anchor, 139 (56.7%) required two anchors, 63 (25.7%) required three anchors and 2 (0.8%) required four anchors. Significant improvements were reported for all PROs (P ≤ .001) at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Arthroscopic 'mini-Max' labral repair using non-absorbable knotless suture anchors is a safe and effective technique for improving the lives of patients suffering from symptomatic acetabular labrum tears.

Knee Loading After ACL-R Is Related to Quadriceps Strength and Knee Extension Differences Across the Continuum of Care.

BACKGROUND: Quadriceps strength and knee extension are believed to be important in the ability to effectively load the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R). PURPOSE: To compare quadriceps strength (QUADS), side-to-side knee extension difference (ExtDiff), and knee energy absorption contribution (EAC) in patients preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and at return to sport (RTS). A secondary aim was to determine how the factors of QUADS and ExtDiff contributed to the ability to load the knee (knee EAC) at each of the 3 time points. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Overall, 41 individuals (mean ± SD age, 15.95 ± 1.63 years) were enrolled in this study. QUADS, ExtDiff, and knee EAC during a double-limb squat were collected preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and at RTS. Isokinetic QUADS was collected at 60 deg/s, normalized to body mass, and averaged across 5 trials. Knee extension was measured with a goniometer, and ExtDiff was calculated for analyses. Knee EAC was measured during double-limb squat descent and was calculated as a percentage of total energy absorption for the limb. Observations were obtained from both the surgical and nonsurgical limbs at the 3 time points. A mixed regression model with random intercept to compare change over the 3 time points was used, and a model selection was conducted with Akaike information criteria. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Surgical limb QUADS was significantly lower preoperatively (mean ± SD, 1.37 ± 0.49 N·m/kg; P = .0023) and at 12 weeks (1.11 ± 0.38 N·m/kg; P < .0001) than at RTS (1.58 ± 0.47 N·m/kg). Nonsurgical limb QUADS was also significantly lower preoperatively (2.01 ± 0.54 N·m/kg; P < .0256) and at 12 weeks (2.03 ± 0.48 N·m/kg; P < .0233) than at RTS (2.18 ± 0.54 N·m/kg). Knee EAC for the surgical limb was significantly lower at 12 weeks than at RTS (40.98% ± 13.73% vs 47.50% ± 12.04%; P < .0032), and ExtDiff was significantly greater preoperatively than at RTS (-2.68° ± 3.19° vs -0.63° ± 1.43°; P < .0001). Preoperatively, QUADS for both the surgical (P < .0003) and nonsurgical (P = .0023) limbs was a significant predictor of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 33.99% of the variance. At 12 weeks, surgical limb QUADS was a significant predictor (P < .0051) of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 18.83% of the variance. At RTS, ExtDiff was a significant predictor (P = .0201) of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 12.92% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The ability to load the knee after ACL injury changes across the continuum of care and is related to QUADS and ExtDiff. These results provide clinicians with insight into potential contributing factors that may limit knee loading during the rehabilitation process.

A Contact Pressure Analysis Comparing an All-Inside and Inside-Out Surgical Repair Technique for Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscus Tears.

PURPOSE: To directly compare effectiveness of the inside-out and all-inside medial meniscal repair techniques in restoring native contact area and contact pressure across the medial tibial plateau at multiple knee flexion angles. METHODS: Twelve male, nonpaired (n = 12), fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees underwent a series of 5 consecutive states: (1) intact medial meniscus, (2) MCL tear and repair, (3) simulated bucket-handle longitudinal tear of the medial meniscus, (4) inside-out meniscal repair, and (5) all-inside meniscal repair. Knees were loaded with a 1,000-N axial compressive force at 5 knee flexion angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°), and contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure were calculated using thin film pressure sensors. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the inside-out and all-inside repair techniques at any flexion angle for contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure (all P > .791). Compared with the torn meniscus state, inside-out and all-inside repair techniques resulted in increased contact area at all flexion angles (all P < .005 and all P < .037, respectively), decreased mean contact pressure at all flexion angles (all P < .007 and all P < .001, respectively) except for 0° (P = .097 and P = .39, respectively), and decreased peak contact pressure at all flexion angles (all P < .001, all P < .001, respectively) except for 0° (P = .080 and P = .544, respectively). However, there were significant differences in contact area and peak contact pressure between the intact state and inside-out technique at angles ≥45° (all P < .014 and all P < .032, respectively). Additionally, there were significant differences between the intact state and all-inside technique in contact area at 60° and 90° and peak contact pressure at 90° (both P < .005 and P = .004, respectively). Median values of intact contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure over the tested flexion angles ranged from 498 to 561 mm2, 786 to 997 N/mm2, and 1,990 to 2,215 N/mm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure were not significantly different between the all-inside and inside-out repair techniques at any tested flexion angle. Both techniques adequately restored native meniscus biomechanics near an intact level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An all-inside repair technique provided similar, native-state-restoring contact mechanics compared with an inside-out repair technique for the treatment of displaced bucket-handle tears of the medial meniscus. Thus, both techniques may adequately decrease the likelihood of cartilage degeneration.

The use of a pitch count estimator to calculate exposure in collegiate baseball pitchers.

OBJECTIVE: Excessive pitch counts have been associated with arm pain in pitchers. Tracking of exposure is difficult based on participation on multiple teams and variability in organizational rules. Statisticians have estimated exposure for professional pitchers using pitch count estimators. Our objective was to determine the utility of pitch count estimators at the collegiate level. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort; 29 collegiate pitchers. METHODS: The team athletic trainer collected game pitch count data. The total number of batters faced (PA), strike outs (SO), and walks (BB) were recorded from the box score and entered into the pitch count formula (3.3*PA + 1.5*SO + 2.2*BB) to estimate pitch counts. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs(2,1)) and standard error of measurement (SEM), were used to examine the agreement between actual and estimated pitch counts. RESULTS: The mean pitch count was correlated with the estimated pitch count (628 ± 476 vs.603 ± 426; r = .99, p < .001). The actual and estimated pitch counts per season demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC(2,1) = 0.99; SEM = 56 pitches). The ICC(2,1) calculated to compare actual and estimated pitch counts for starters and relievers (ICC(2,1) = 0.98; SEM = 77; 0.98; SEM = 39) reflect good agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The estimator provides a method of quantifying exposure for pitchers to help plan safe participation and control for confounding factors when attempting to understand the risks of pitching.

Meniscus suture repair: minimum 10-year outcomes in patients younger than 40 years compared with patients 40 and older.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared outcomes after meniscus suture repair in patients younger than 40 years versus patients 40 years and older. PURPOSE: To document failure rates and long-term outcomes after meniscus suture repair by a single surgeon, using the inside-out technique, at a minimum 10-year follow-up in patients younger than 40 years versus those 40 years and older. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study included all patients 18 years or older who underwent meniscus suture repair with the inside-out technique by a single surgeon between January 1992 and December 2003. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts according to age: <40 years (cohort 1) and ≥40 years (cohort 2). If patients underwent subsequent knee surgery, all subsequent reports, whether performed by the original treating surgeon or by a different surgeon elsewhere, were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers not involved in the primary care of the patients. Reviewers classified surgeries as failures if the subsequent surgery treated the same area of the meniscus as repaired in the index surgery. Patients completed a subjective questionnaire at minimum of 10 years after arthroscopy. Outcomes measures included Lysholm, Tegner, and patient satisfaction with outcome. All data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: The surgeon performed 339 meniscus repairs between 1992 and 2003. The study included 181 knees in 178 patients, who had a mean age of 33 years (range, 18-70 years). Cohort 1 contained 136 knees; 16 patients (12%) were lost to follow-up and 47 (35%) underwent a subsequent knee arthroscopy. Cohort 2 contained 45 knees; 2 patients (4.4%) were lost to follow-up, 3 patients had a total knee arthroplasty, and 12 patients (28%) underwent a subsequent knee arthroscopy. In cohort 1, the meniscus repair failure rate was 5.5% (6/110), and in cohort 2 it was 5.3% (2/38) (P = .927). There was no significant difference in failure rate based on which meniscus was repaired (P = .257), concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (P = .092), or microfracture (P = .674). Average follow-up time for cohort 1 was 16.1 years (range, 10.0-21.9 years), with 82% follow-up (n = 73/89); average follow-up time for cohort 2 was 16.2 years (range, 10.1-21.0 years), with 93% follow-up (n = 28/30). There were no significant differences in outcomes scores after meniscus suture repair based on age cohort or meniscus side, presence of an ACL tear, or concomitant microfracture procedure. CONCLUSION: Meniscus repair failure rate was not different in patients who were younger than 40 years versus those who were 40 years or older at time of meniscus index surgery. Patients who underwent meniscus suture repair had high function and high patient satisfaction at an average of 16 years after meniscus suture repair, and no differences were seen based on age.

Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation.

BACKGROUND: Current etiologic theories concerning healing rates in rotator cuff repair have focused on the blood supply in the tendinous portion of the cuff. We currently have little information regarding the effect of our repair techniques on this critical variable. We hypothesize that intratendinous blood flow is changed during transosseus equivalent tendon fixation. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with rotator cuff tears amenable to double row fixation were included in the study. Each patient underwent a standard arthroscopic transosseous equivalent double row fixation procedure using the Arthrex SutureBridge technique (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). After tying down of the medial row, a first set of recordings was taken using a custom laser doppler flowmetry probe (Perimed, Inc., Ohio, USA). A second recording was made following securing of the lateral PushLock anchors. The data were compared to determine the overall effect on blood flow associated with this technique. RESULTS: Summated averages for the 2 groups show a significant (44.67%) decline in the blood flow present after the second row of implants are placed (P < .01). Individual calculations for regions of the cuff tear indicate significant differences in anterior third (P = .01), middle third (P < .01), and posterior third (P = .02) of the tear after transosseous equivalent fixation. CONCLUSION: Completion of the construct with lateral anchors in the transosseous equivalent technique results in reduced but preserved blood flow in the tendon repair site. Further study is required to determine the implications for tendon healing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intratendinous blood flow is a variable that should be considered when evaluating repair methods in rotator cuff surgery.

A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the forearm supination and elbow flexion strength of the upper extremity in patients who have had an arthroscopic long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) release with patients who have had an LHBT tenodesis. METHODS: Cybex isokinetic strength testing (Cybex Division of Lumex, Ronkonkoma, NY) was performed on 17 patients who underwent arthroscopic LHBT tenotomy, 19 patients who underwent arthroscopic LHBT tenodesis, and 31 age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched control subjects. Subjects were considered fully recovered from shoulder surgery, were released for unrestricted activities, and were at least 6 months after surgery before testing. Subjects were tested for forearm supination and elbow flexion strength of both arms by use of a Cybex II NORM isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/s and 120°/s. Testing was performed on injured and uninjured arms as well as dominant and nondominant arms in control subjects. Both forearm supination and elbow flexion strength values were recorded. RESULTS: Comparison between the involved and uninvolved upper extremities within each group by use of a paired t test showed a 7% increase in elbow flexion strength when the dominant and nondominant arms were compared at 60°/s. Neither the tenotomy nor tenodesis groups exhibited elbow flexion strength differences at 120°/s (all P ≥ .147). Comparison between groups by use of 2 × 3 analysis of variance (speed × group) showed no statistical difference in either forearm supination or elbow flexion strength when we compared the tenotomy, tenodesis, and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic patients who have had biceps tenotomy or tenodesis, no statistically significant forearm supination or elbow flexion strength differences existed in the involved extremity between the 2 study groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Long head of the biceps tendon pain: differential diagnosis and treatment.

UNLABELLED: Though the role of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in shoulder pathology has been extensively investigated, it remains controversial. Historically, there have been large shifts in opinions on LHBT function, ranging from being a vestigial structure to playing a critical role in shoulder stability. Today, despite incomplete understanding of its clinical or biomechanical involvement, most investigators would agree that LHBT pathology can be a significant cause of anterior shoulder pain. When the biceps tendon is determined to be a significant contributor to a patient's symptoms, the treatment options include various conservative interventions and possible surgical procedures, such as tenotomy, transfer, or tenodesis. The ultimate treatment decision is based upon a variety of factors, including the patient's overall medical condition, severity, and duration of symptoms, expectations, associated shoulder pathology, and surgeon preference. The purpose of this manuscript is to review current anatomic, functional, and clinical information regarding the LHBT, including conservative treatment, surgical treatment, and postsurgical rehabilitation regimens. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

Surgical and therapeutic management of a complete proximal hamstring avulsion after failed conservative approach.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: After 2 attempts at conservative care for a diagnosis of hamstring strain, the patient had a surgical hamstring allograft reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to describe the physical therapy approach to postoperative management of a hamstring reconstruction. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 24-year-old female coach who sustained a complete avulsion of the proximal hamstring tendon while playing softball had a surgical hamstring reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft. Precautions concerning range of motion and stretching, weight-bearing status, and brace were followed to protect the surgical graft. Treatment incorporated cardiovascular, strength and proprioception exercises, and progressed with the focus on correct movement patterns and eccentric muscle control during functional movements. OUTCOMES: The patient attended 25 physical therapy sessions over 7 months. Muscle strength improved from 4/5 to 5/5. Straight-leg raise range of motion decreased from 145 degrees to 90 degrees . Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores improved from 15/80 to 70/80. DISCUSSION: A complete avulsion of the proximal insertion is rare. Conservative management of hamstring tears has traditionally focused on end-range passive stretching, modalities, and direct hamstring strengthening. New evidence recommends a program that is more protective of the injured tissue and includes exercises such as core stabilization; indirect hamstring strengthening may be beneficial in the treatment of hamstring injuries. This concept was taken into account when considering the rehabilitation protocol and progression for this patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.

Rehabilitation after arthroscopy of an acetabular labral tear.

Over the past few years, arthroscopy of the hip joint is becoming more common as a technique in both the diagnosis and treatment of hip pain. A frequent cause of hip and groin pain is a tear of the acetabular labrum. Patients with labral tears complain of pain in the groin region and pain with clicking in the hip without a history of pain prior to the original onset. Once a patient presents with signs and symptoms of hip pain that are greater than four weeks in conjunction with indicative findings of a labral tear by way of MRI, he or she may be considered a good candidate for arthroscopy of the hip joint. Little evidence exists in the current literature on rehabilitative procedures performed after arthroscopy of the acetabular labrum. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to suggest a rehabilitation protocol after acetebular labral debridement or repair.

Arthroscopic bullet removal from the acetabulum.

Hip arthroscopy has been shown to offer minimally invasive access to the hip joint compared with standard open arthrotomy. The use of arthroscopy for diagnosing and treating disorders about the hip continues to evolve. The authors describe an arthroscopically assisted technique for the removal of a bullet lodged in the acetabulum of a patient who sustained a gunshot wound that entered the abdomen and traversed the rectum before ending up in the weight-bearing dome of the acetabulum. A number of issues led to the decision to use both arthroscopy and this specific technique. Most importantly was our desire to limit the amount of surrounding articular cartilage and local bone damage on removal. Minimizing the soft tissue dissection needed to access the bullet and keeping down our operative time also played a role in deciding to use this technique. We considered the risks of potential bullet fragmentation and migration, as well as a possible abdominal compartment syndrome before proceeding. This surgical technique afforded a very satisfactory outcome for this patient and serves as a model for others when encountering a similar injury pattern in a trauma patient. It is a procedure that can be performed safely, quickly, and with minimal complications for surgeons who have experience with arthroscopy of the hip joint.

PLRI: posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.

Recurrent and persistent instability of the elbow has long been a source of confusion and dismay for both patients and physicians. Early recognition after elbow injury and careful attention to soft tissue repair during lateral elbow surgery may diminish the incidence of this condition. Repair and reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) now offers practical and often successful solutions for patients with posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow.