Can Alloplastic Total Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction be Used in the Growing Patient? A Preliminary Report.

INTRODUCTION: Although primarily reserved for adult patients, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) total joint reconstructive (TJR) surgery is rarely used in the pediatric population due to its many challenges; it is only performed after all other non-invasive or invasive procedures have been exhausted. Although autogenous grafting has been discussed in the literature, there is very little regarding synthetic or alloplastic materials. In this study, we performed alloplastic TMJ reconstruction on 5 patients with severe ankylosis due to various craniofacial deformities and prior traumatic injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series analysis of skeletally immature patients who received alloplastic TMJ reconstruction for recurrent and advanced ankylosis. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: less than 16 years of age, diagnosis of TMJ ankylosis, skeletally immature patients, and unilateral/bilateral total alloplastic TMJ reconstruction. We used the maximum incisal opening (MIO) changes as 1 component to assess for functional improvement. RESULTS: Since many of these cases involved gross discrepancies from the normal variants, it was difficult to quantitatively compare the patients with one another. Nevertheless, we used cephalometric analysis to compare pre- and postoperative results on each patient. For this study, we used MIO as our primary assessment: the preoperative average for MIO was 7.4 mm, and the postoperative average 24 mm. CONCLUSION: It is our experience that the use of alloplastic material will not result in harm to either the growth of the mandible or patient's ability to achieve an improved MIO based on our long- and short-term results. These results demonstrate that for even complex craniofacial deformities and traumatic injuries, our patients experienced a significant improvement in MIO, 1 of the main indicators for TMJ function. We conclude that the alloplastic joint can provide a predictable pathway to restore patient's MIO and obviate the need for repeated surgeries, which can be a more challenging alternative with poorer outcomes.

Biomet Microfixation Temporomandibular Joint Replacement System: a 3-year follow-up study of patients treated during 1995 to 2005.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of a stock alloplastic total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) implant system, the Biomet Microfixation TMJ Replacement System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 10-year multicenter clinical trial from 1995 to 2005, 442 Biomet Microfixation TMJ Replacement Systems were implanted in 288 patients (154 bilaterally and 134 unilaterally). Patients were followed at landmark times, including the date of surgery and at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, 1 year 6 months, and 3 years. The 3 major metrics that were evaluated were preoperative and postoperative pain, interference with eating, and maximal incisal opening. Paired t tests and comparison analyses were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement in pain level (P = .0001), jaw function (P = .0001), and incisal opening (P = .0001). Although there were complications necessitating the removal of 14 of 442 implants (3.2%), there were no device-related mechanical failures. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical study presented supports the conclusion that a stock TMJ alloplastic replacement, based on sound orthopedic and biomedical principles, is a safe and efficacious option when alloplastic reconstruction of the TMJ is indicated.

Craniofacial implant surgery.

Extraoral cranial implant-retained prosthetic reconstructions have been proved to be highly successful. Replacement of the eyes, ears, nose, and larger areas including combined midface defects, which frequently have no other option available, has been done successfully. Burn patients and those with congenital defects are good candidates for this type of reconstruction, especially after autogenous attempts have failed. Cranial implant prosthetic reconstruction should be considered as a viable option for difficult craniofacial defects.

Craniofacial implant surgery.

Extraoral cranial implant-retained prosthetic reconstructions have been proved to be highly successful. Replacement of the eyes, ears, nose, and larger areas including combined midface defects, which frequently have no other option available, has been done successfully. Burn patients and those with congenital defects are good candidates for this type of reconstruction, especially after autogenous attempts have failed. Cranial implant prosthetic reconstruction should be considered as a viable option for difficult craniofacial defects.

Patient with Pfeiffer's syndrome treated by midfacial distraction and comprehensive orthodontics.

Treatment for patients with craniofacial anomalies always presents a great challenge to orthodontists. Treatment usually requires both comprehensive orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. In this article, we report on a patient with Pfeiffer's syndrome treated by midfacial distraction and comprehensive orthodontics.

Stereolithography for craniofacial surgery.

Advances in computer technology have aided in the diagnostic and clinical management of complex congenital craniofacial deformities. The use of stereolithographic models has begun to replace traditional milled models in the treatment of craniofacial deformities. Research has shown that stereolithography models are highly accurate and provide added information in treatment planning for the correction of craniofacial deformities. These include the added visualization of the complex craniofacial anatomy and preoperative surgical planning with a highly accurate three-dimensional model. While the stereolithographic process has had a beneficial impact on the field of craniofacial surgery, the added cost of the procedure continues to be a hindrance to its widespread acceptance in clinical practice. With improved technology and accessibility the utilization of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery is expected to increase. This review will highlight the development and current usage of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery and provide illustration of it use.

Experience with cranial implant-based prosthetic reconstruction.

Reconstruction of acquired or congenitally absent facial structures is a challenging task for the reconstructive surgeon. Often inadequate soft tissue, cartilaginous, or osseous support exists for a reconstruction which is functional, aesthetic, and achieved with a reasonable effort on the part of the surgeon and patient. Prosthetic reconstruction of these structures utilizing cranial implants is a viable option which offers several advantages when compared to traditional reconstructive techniques. We present our experience with 114 cranial implants in 32 patients for craniofacial reconstruction. One hundred fourteen cranial implants were placed in a total of 32 patients for reconstruction of facial structures. Indications for cranial implants with prosthetic reconstruction were lack of adequate tissue for reconstruction, failed reconstructive attempts, and selection of the technique by the patient. Seventy-two implants were placed in the mastoid region, 31 within the orbit, 7 within the nasal cavity, with four additional implants for the reconstruction of eyebrows. Cranial implants were followed by clinical and radiographic examination at intervals ranging from 3-46 months (mean 15.3 months). Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for surgical complications, soft tissue reactions, infections, and implant failures. The total success rate of cranial implantation in the study group was 92.9% (106/114). Surgical complications occurred in three of the 32 patients (9.3%). All cranial implants were successfully reconstructed after integration. Seven percent of the implants failed after initial integration was successful. The rate of significant soft tissue reactions or frank infection observed among the implanted patients was 6.1%. Titanium cranial implants coupled with custom prosthetic reconstruction offer an excellent alternative to traditional surgical techniques in the reconstruction of acquired or congenitally absent facial structures. Predictability, prosthetic adaptability, as well as superior aesthetics are major advantages to this technique when compared to traditional surgical reconstructive techniques.

Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.

PURPOSE: Using finite element (FE) computer model simulation, we compared the mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) through the use of 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the reconstructed geometry from computed tomography scans of dry adult skull with a mandibular deformity requiring surgical correction, we developed 3-dimensional FE models that simulate BSSRO with 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy. Technique 1 uses 3 bicortical titanium screws. Technique 2 uses a curved titanium plate with 4 monocortical screws. Five different load cases were applied to the mandible after the simulated BSSRO with the mandible being constrained at both temporomandibular joints. To evaluate the efficacy of these 2 stabilization techniques, we compared 1) the resulting deflections at the central incisor, 2) the mechanical stresses developed in the bone in the vicinity of the stabilizing implants, and 3) the mechanical stresses developed within the screw/plating system themselves. RESULTS: Technique 1, using 3 bicortical titanium screws, leads to smaller deflections at the central incisor for all 5 load cases, suggesting higher mechanical stability. Technique 1 also leads to lower mechanical stresses in the bone and in the implanted screws, whereas technique 2 is associated with higher values in each of these quantities. CONCLUSIONS: To stabilize osteotomies after a 3-dimensional simulated BSSRO, 3 bicortical screws forming an inverted-L configuration are shown to offer more effective load transmission in the mandibular construct. This technique, when examined in an FE model, leads to higher stability with lower mechanical stresses in the bone near the bicortical screws.

Management of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

In approximately 1 in 1000 live births in the United States, an infant has some variant of a facial, skeletal, or craniofacial deformity. If cleft lip and palate deformities are included, the incidence is greater. Timing of the surgical management of these patients has been advocated from the first few weeks after birth until well into the second decade. Many of these patients require multiple, staged procedures that involve movements of the bone and soft tissue from the intracranial and extracranial approaches. The surgical approach to most of these congenital deformities was radically changed by techniques introduced to the United States by Paul Tessier of France in 1967. From his imaginative intracranial and extracranial approaches, numerous advances have been made that facilitate the care of most of these children. More recently, additional advances in pediatric anesthesia and biodegradable plating systems have improved the management of these complex craniomaxillofacial deformities.

Management of syndromic craniosynostosis.

Normalization of craniofacial malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis patients is an extended process. The care starts at birth and ends in adolescence. Multiple surgeries may be required for each deformity. The relationship among patient, family, and doctor team is important because they must understand the complete processes of management. Psychologists provide an important support mechanism.