Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Parasitol ; 119(2-3): 125-35, 2004 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14746972

ABSTRACT

A survey to investigate resistance to drugs used in the treatment of bovine trypanosomosis was conducted in the eastern province of Zambia between 1996 and 1998. A cross-sectional study was conducted in three districts (Petauke, Katete, Lundazi) at 34 village sampling sites selected at random from villages that had shown greater than 6% prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis during an earlier survey. A longitudinal study was conducted in same three districts over a 1-year period. The study sites were chosen from the cross-sectional study and included eight sites showing high trypanosomosis prevalence and where no control activities were recorded. Use was made of parasitological methods, tests of resistance in cattle and mice and isometamidium-ELISA. Overall mean prevalence of trypanosomosis was 14.4, with 96% of infections caused by Trypanosoma congolense. The remainder was caused by Trypanosoma vivax (2%) and Trypanosoma brucei (2%). Tests in mice showed that of the stabilates collected, 24 (34%) were resistant to only isometamidium chloride, 8 (11.3%) were resistant to only diminazene aceturate, 1 (1.4%) was resistant to both drugs, and 38 (53.5%) were sensitive to both drugs. At least 2 out of 27 stabilates tested in cattle appeared to be resistant to trypanocidal drugs, 1 to isometamidium and 1 to diminazene. Isometamidium could be detected in only 63 (4.1%) of 1526 serum samples from cattle in the study. Only 6 (2.8%) of 212 serum samples from trypanosome-infected cattle had serum levels of the drug above 0.4 ng isometamidium per ml serum which is indicative for drug resistance in the infecting parasite population. Although some drug resistance is apparent, diminazene aceturate and isometamidium chloride can still be expected to be effective as a sanative pair in this area in most cases, since not more than 1 stabilate of 71 investigated showed evidence of resistance to both drugs.


Subject(s)
Trypanosoma congolense/isolation & purification , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/drug therapy , Animals , Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Cattle , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance/physiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , In Vitro Techniques , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mice , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Trypanocidal Agents/pharmacology , Trypanocidal Agents/therapeutic use , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/blood , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/epidemiology , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/parasitology , Zambia/epidemiology
2.
Vet Parasitol ; 97(3): 171-82, 2001 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11390069

ABSTRACT

Resistance to the drugs used to control African animal trypanosomosis is increasingly recognised as a constraint to livestock production in sub-Saharan Africa. The most commonly used tests for detection of trypanocidal drug resistance are tests using mice or ruminants, but these suffer from lack of standardisation and hence it may be difficult to compare the results of different investigators. Tests in mice are less expensive than tests in ruminants, but while tests in mice they may be useful as a general guide to resistance in a geographic area they should not be extrapolated to cattle on an individual trypanosome level. Moreover, the commonly used protocols are too laborious for their application to large number of trypanosome isolates on an area-wide basis. This paper presents guidelines for standardised testing of trypanocidal drugs in vivo, and introduces a simplified single-dose test for use in mice, which is convenient for use in areas with limited laboratory facilities. The single-dose test is appropriate for characterisation of geographic areas in terms of trypanocidal drug resistance using large numbers of trypanosome isolates, for making comparisons between areas, and for monitoring changes in trypanocidal drug resistance over time. Multiple-dose tests may be used to determine the degree of resistance of individual stabilates to be determined precisely in mice are also described, but for logistical reasons these will rarely be conducted on more than a few stabilates, and testing of a larger number of stabilates in the single-dose test will generally provide more useful information. Finally, we describe tests in cattle that may be used to determine the efficacy of recommended curative doses of trypanocidal drugs for the treatment of infection with individual trypanosome isolates, including Trypanosoma vivax, which is rarely infective for mice.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Disease Models, Animal , Mice , Trypanocidal Agents/therapeutic use , Trypanosoma brucei brucei/drug effects , Trypanosoma congolense/drug effects , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/drug therapy , Trypanosomiasis/veterinary , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Diminazene/administration & dosage , Diminazene/pharmacology , Diminazene/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Ethidium/administration & dosage , Ethidium/pharmacology , Ethidium/therapeutic use , Geography , Random Allocation , Trypanocidal Agents/administration & dosage , Trypanocidal Agents/pharmacology , Trypanosomiasis/drug therapy , Tsetse Flies
3.
Prev Vet Med ; 49(3-4): 249-57, 2001 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11311957

ABSTRACT

A longitudinal study was conducted over a 1-year period in six selected villages in Petauke and Katete districts in the Eastern Province of Zambia. Starting in November 1997, 50 animals were sampled at random at each village every 2 months. The parasitological prevalence of trypanosomosis was determined by the haematocrit centrifugation buffy-coat technique, supplemented with thick and thin Giemsa-stained blood films. Serum samples also were collected for anti-trypanosomal antibody determination by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Parasitological prevalence was highly variable between villages and between visits (range: 0-28.6%; median: 3.1%). Seroprevalence was also variable between villages (range: 0-80.8%; median: 50%), but was less variable between visits. Average annual parasitological prevalence and average annual seroprevalence for each village were highly correlated [R(2)(adjustedford.f.)=0.89, p<0.01]. Seroprevalence measured on any single visit to a study village was better than parasitological prevalence as a predictor of average annual parasitological prevalence.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Trypanosoma/immunology , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/epidemiology , Animals , Cattle , Demography , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Longitudinal Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Trypanosomiasis, Bovine/immunology , Zambia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...