ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multicomponent collection (MCC) enables production and processing of various blood components during one apheresis session. In this prospective crossover study, the effects of donating platelets (PLTs) and packed red blood cells (PRBCs) on donor's blood cell count, coagulation, PLT function and iron state were analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight MCCs were performed using two different cell separators (Fenwal Amicus(®), CaridianBCT Trima Accel(®)). Two units of platelet concentrates and one unit of PRBCs were collected during each session. Full blood cell count and iron status were obtained on day 0 before and after apheresis, day 2, day 14 and day 42. PLT function was analysed by aggregometry and rotation thromboelastometry in parallel with coagulation tests before and after MCC and at day 2. RESULTS: Multicomponent collection was well tolerated without adverse side effects. Blood cell count and iron parameters declined and most of them (haemoglobin, haematocrit, transferrin, transferrin saturation and ferritin) were significantly below baseline values until at least day 42 after donation. Absent iron stores were seen in 31·3% of the donors. In contrast, PLTs significantly exceeded pre-donation values after 14 days and remained significantly increased for 42 days. After 2 days, coagulation parameters were only slightly (P > 0·05) altered, whereas PLT function was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Multicomponent collection is an obviously safe procedure; however, the significant long-term impact on the donor's blood count and iron store, as well as impaired PLT function, has to be considered in regard to donor safety.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation/physiology , Blood Component Removal/methods , Blood Donors , Blood Platelets/physiology , Iron/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Blood Platelets/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
The development of apheresis technology has increased efficiency in donor blood use by collecting specific blood components in several combinations. The question of donor safety raised by the contact of donor blood with foreign, only in part biocompatible surfaces remains. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of multicomponent blood collection on thrombin generation performing an overall function test of coagulation. DONORS, METHODS: 26 blood donors were included. Per apheresis two units of platelets and one unit of RBCs were collected by two cell separators (Amicus and Trima Accel). Each donor underwent the procedure on both apheresis systems. Samples were collected before, immediately after, and 48 hours after apheresis. Thrombin generation was measured by means of calibrated automated thrombography (CAT). RESULTS: CAT-data changed only slightly and no significant changes were seen before, immediately after, and 48 hours after apheresis. The parameters did not differ significantly between the two different apheresis devices. CONCLUSION: No change in parameters of continuous thrombin generation occurred, suggesting that apheresis did not lead to severe alterations in the haemostatic system.
Subject(s)
Fetal Blood/physiology , Infant, Premature/blood , Thrombin/biosynthesis , Cesarean Section , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lipoproteins/metabolism , Pregnancy , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the advantages of predeposit of autologous blood (PDAB), and whether more comfortable blood conservation regimens may yield comparable results. To test the hypothesis that preoperative treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) with or without acute concomitant normovolaemic haemodilution (ANHD) is as effective as PDAB in reducing allogeneic blood transfusions, we conducted a prospective randomised study in women undergoing primary hip replacement. METHODS: Sixty consecutive female patients scheduled for primary hip replacement and suitable for PDAB were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups. Group I (EPO) and II (ANHD) received 600 U/kg rHuEPO s.c. and 100 mg iron saccharate i.v. on day 14 and, if needed, on day 7 before surgery. Additionally, in group II acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANHD) was implemented after induction of anaesthesia. In group III (PDAB) conventional PDAB up to 3 U, without volume replacement but with concomitant oral iron therapy, was performed starting 4 weeks before surgery. RESULTS: The blood conservation methods resulted in a comparable net gain of red cells in all 3 groups until the day of surgery. Because of the withdrawal of autologous blood, haemoglobin values before surgery were lower in the PDAB group than in the EPO and ANHD groups, and during surgery were lower in the PDAB and ANHD groups than in the rHuEPO-only group. Applying moderate ANHD in conjunction with preoperative rHuEPO treatment did not yield an incremental decrease in allogeneic transfusions. There was no difference between the groups in the number of patients who received allogeneic transfusions or in the total number of allogeneic units transfused. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of autologous blood is associated with lower pre- and intraoperative haemoglobin levels when compared to preoperative augmentation of red cell mass using rHu-EPO. As a measure to reduce allogeneic transfusion requirements, preoperative treatment with rHuEPO may be as effective as standard predeposit of autologous blood in women undergoing primary hip replacement, but requires less preoperative time.