Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 27(9): 635-641, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37719359

ABSTRACT

Background: Critically ill patients are frequently transported to various locations within the hospital for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, which increases the risk of adverse events (AEs). This multicenter prospective observational study was undertaken to determine the incidence of AEs related to intrahospital transport, their severity, and their effects on patient outcomes. Patients and methods: We included consecutive unstable critically ill patients requiring intrahospital transport, across 15 Indian tertiary care centers over 5 months (October 11, 2022-February 20, 2023). Apart from the demographics and severity of illness, data related to transport itself, such as indications and destination, incidence of AEs, their category and treatment required, and patient outcomes, were recorded in a standard form. Results: Eight hundred and ninety-three patients were transported on 1065 occasions out of the intensive care unit (ICU). The mean (SD) acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of the patients was 15.38 (±7.35). One hundred and two AEs occurred, wherein cardiovascular instability was the most common occurrence (31, 30.4%). Two patients had cardiac arrest immediately after transport. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II [odds ratio (OR): 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.00-1.05, p = 0.04], emergent transport (OR: 5.11, 95% CI - 3.32-7.88, p = 0.00), and team composition (OR: 5.34, 95% CI - 1.63-17.5, p = 0.00) during transport were found to be independent predictors of AEs. Conclusion: We found a high incidence of AEs during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. These events were more common during emergent transports and when the patients were transported by doctors. Transport by itself was not related to ICU mortality. We feel that stabilization of the patients before transport and adherence to a standardized protocol may help in minimizing the AEs, thereby enhancing patient safety. How to cite this article: Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Kulkarni AP, Govil D, Dixit SB, Munjal M, et al. Adverse Events during Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study (I-TOUCH Study). Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(9):635-641.

3.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 25(10): 1137-1146, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916746

ABSTRACT

In acute respiratory failure due to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, mechanical ventilation remains challenging and may result in high mortality. The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may delay required invasive ventilation, increase adverse outcomes, and have a potential aerosol risk to caregivers. Data of 30 patients were collected from patient files and analyzed. Twenty-one (70%) patients were weaned successfully after helmet-NIV support (NIV success group), and invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 9 (30%) patients (NIV failure group) of which 8 (26.7%) patients died. In NIV success vs failure patients, the mean baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio (PFR) (147.2 ± 57.9 vs 156.8 ± 59.0 mm Hg; p = 0.683) and PFR before initiation of helmet (132.3 ± 46.9 vs 121.6 ± 32.7 mm Hg; p = 0.541) were comparable. The NIV success group demonstrated a progressive improvement in PFR in comparison with the failure group at 2 hours (158.8 ± 56.1 vs 118.7 ± 40.7 mm Hg; p = 0.063) and 24 hours (PFR-24) (204.4 ± 94.3 vs 121.3 ± 32.6; p = 0.016). As predictor variables, PFR-24 and change (delta) in PFR at 24 hours from baseline or helmet initiation (dPFR-24) were significantly associated with NIV success in univariate analysis but similar significance could not be reflected in multivariate analysis perhaps due to a small sample size of the study. The PFR-24 cutoff of 161 mm Hg and dPFR-24 cutoff of -1.44 mm Hg discriminate NIV success and failure groups with the area under curve (confidence interval) of 0.78 (0.62-0.95); p = 0.015 and 0.74 (0.55-0.93); p = 0.039, respectively. Helmet interface NIV may be a safe and effective tool for the management of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia with acute respiratory failure. More studies are needed to further evaluate the role of helmet NIV especially in patients with initial PFR <150 mm Hg to define PFR/dPFR cutoff at the earliest time point for prediction of helmet-NIV success. How to cite this article Jha OK, Kumar S, Mehra S, Sircar M, Gupta R. Helmet NIV in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure due to COVID-19: Change in PaO2/FiO2 Ratio a Predictor of Success. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1137-1146.

4.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 25(10): 1093-1107, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916740

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to study organizational aspects, case mix, and practices in Indian intensive care units (ICUs) from 2018 to 2019, following the Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study (INDICAPS) of 2010-2011. METHODS: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2018 and 2019. ICU, patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 hours, and ICU outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Adherence to selected compliance measures was determined. Data were analyzed for 4,669 adult patients from 132 ICUs. RESULTS: On the study day, mean age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 56.9 ± 17.41 years, 16.7 ± 9.8, and 4.4 ± 3.6, respectively. Moreover, 24% and 22.2% of patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes (VIs), respectively. On the study days, 1,195 patients (25.6%) were infected and 1,368 patients (29.3%) had sepsis during their ICU stay. ICU mortality was 1,092 out of 4,669 (23.4%), including 737 deaths and 355 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU. Compliance for process measures related to MV ranged between 62.7 and 85.3%, 11.2 and 47.4% for monitoring delirium, sedation, and analgesia, and 7.7 and 25.3% for inappropriate transfusion of blood products. Only 34.8% of ICUs routinely used capnography. Large hospitals with ≥500 beds, closed ICUs, the APACHE II and SOFA scores, medical admissions, the presence of cancer or cirrhosis of the liver, the presence of infection on the study day, and the need for MV or VIs were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital size and closed ICUs are independently associated with worse outcomes. The proportion of TDs remains high. There is a scope for improvements in processes of care.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03631927). HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Divatia JV, Mehta Y, Govil D, Zirpe K, Amin PR, Ramakrishnan N, et al. Intensive Care in India in 2018-2019: The Second Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1093-1107.

5.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 25(2): 224-227, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33707904

ABSTRACT

High-flow tracheal oxygenation (HFTO), a modification of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), has been used in tracheostomized patients but only rarely for weaning. We present two cases on prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) where HFTO assisted weaning. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Ramachandran L, Jha OK, Sircar M. High-flow Tracheal Oxygenation: A New Tool for Difficult Weaning. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):224-227.

6.
Acute Crit Care ; 35(3): 218-219, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32811136
7.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 23(8): 363-367, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31485105

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hypoxemic patients undergoing fiber-optic bronchoscopy (FOB) are at risk of worsening of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation due to FOB procedure itself and its complications. As patients with respiratory failure are frequently managed by non-invasive ventilation (NIV); feasibility of FOB through NIV mask has been evaluated in some studies to avoid intubation. We describe here our own case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 28 FOB done through NIV mask in 27 intensive care unit (ICU) patients over 6 years period at our center was collected retrospectively and analysed. RESULTS: Study comprises 27 (17 male; 52±21.6 years age) hypoxemic (PaO2 71.3±14.2, on NIV and oxygen supplementation) patients. All FOB were done at bedside, 15 of them were given sedation for the procedure. Twenty four patients had bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); three underwent bronchial biopsies, four brush cytology and seven transbronchial biopsies. In 10 patients lung or lobar collapse was reversed. There was no significant change between pre and post bronchoscopy ABG parameters except for improved post FOB PaO2 (p = 0.0032) and SpO2 (p = 0.0046). One patient (3.57%) developed late pneumothorax and 3 patients (10.7%) had bleeding after biopsy. Prior to bronchoscopy 17 (16 BIPAP, 1 CPAP) patients were already on NIV. Two patients required mechanical ventilation 6 hours after FOB due to subsequent clinical deterioration but could be weaned off later. One patient died on third day after FOB from acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Hypoxemic patients in ICU can safely undergo bedside diagnostic and simple therapeutic bronchoscopy with NIV support while mostly avoiding intubation and with low complication rates. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Sircar M, Jha OK, Chabbra GS, Bhattacharya S. Noninvasive Ventilation-assisted Bronchoscopy in High-risk Hypoxemic Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(8):363-367.

9.
J Crit Care ; 31(1): 227-32, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26611381

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of adding bronchoalveolar lavage multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) to conventional cultures (CC) on microbiological yield and therapeutic decisions in adult intensive care unit patients with pneumonia and severe sepsis or septic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, bronchoalveolar lavage cultures were taken for control (58 patients, 58 admissions) and study arms (57 patients, 58 admissions). Bronchoalveolar lavage M-PCR was sent simultaneously for the latter. RESULTS: A total of 267 microorganisms were identified (M-PCR alone, 211; CC alone, 15; both, 41) in the study arm vs 64 in controls. Concordance between M-PCR and culture was complete in 32 (55.17%), partial in 4 (6.9%), and discordant in 22 (37.93%) including 17 with positive M-PCR but negative CC. Time to antibiotic therapy modification was significantly less (P < .001) in M-PCR group compared to controls (32.40 ± 14.41 vs 41.74 ± 45.61 hours). There was no significant difference in index episode resolution (48.3% vs 50%; P = 1), intensive care unit mortality (57.4% vs 51.2%; P = .67), and hospital mortality (59.6% vs 61.5%; P = 1) in study and control arms, respectively, despite more septic shock patients in the study arm (89.7% vs 75.9%; P = .05). CONCLUSION: Bronchoalveolar lavage M-PCR with culture leads to higher microbiological yield and earlier modification of antibiotics compared to conventional culture.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/genetics , Fungi/genetics , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Viruses/genetics , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bronchoalveolar Lavage , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/microbiology , Case-Control Studies , Culture Techniques/methods , Female , Fungi/isolation & purification , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Pneumonia/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/microbiology , Shock, Septic/drug therapy , Shock, Septic/microbiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Viruses/isolation & purification
10.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 12(4): 190-3, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19742263

ABSTRACT

Amlodipine overdose is only scarcely reported from India. We report two cases of near fatal Amlodipine overdose managed in our ICU with fluid, vasopressors, calcium infusion and Glucagon. Literature is reviewed and other treatment modalities discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...