Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272873, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35951619

ABSTRACT

Language production has often been described as impaired in psychiatric diseases such as in psychosis. Nevertheless, little is known about the characteristics of linguistic difficulties and their relation with other cognitive domains in patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP), either affective or non-affective. To deepen our comprehension of linguistic profile in FEP, 133 patients with FEP (95 non-affective, FEP-NA; 38 affective, FEP-A) and 133 healthy controls (HC) were assessed with a narrative discourse task. Speech samples were systematically analyzed with a well-established multilevel procedure investigating both micro- (lexicon, morphology, syntax) and macro-linguistic (discourse coherence, pragmatics) levels of linguistic processing. Executive functioning and IQ were also evaluated. Both linguistic and neuropsychological measures were secondarily implemented with a machine learning approach in order to explore their predictive accuracy in classifying participants as FEP or HC. Compared to HC, FEP patients showed language production difficulty at both micro- and macro-linguistic levels. As for the former, FEP produced shorter and simpler sentences and fewer words per minute, along with a reduced number of lexical fillers, compared to HC. At the macro-linguistic level, FEP performance was impaired in local coherence, which was paired with a higher percentage of utterances with semantic errors. Linguistic measures were not correlated with any neuropsychological variables. No significant differences emerged between FEP-NA and FEP-A (p≥0.02, after Bonferroni correction). Machine learning analysis showed an accuracy of group prediction of 76.36% using language features only, with semantic variables being the most impactful. Such a percentage was enhanced when paired with clinical and neuropsychological variables. Results confirm the presence of language production deficits already at the first episode of the illness, being such impairment not related to other cognitive domains. The high accuracy obtained by the linguistic set of features in classifying groups support the use of machine learning methods in neuroscience investigations.


Subject(s)
Language Disorders , Psychotic Disorders , Comprehension , Humans , Language , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychotic Disorders/psychology
2.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 106(1): e130-e139, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33017843

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Cushing's syndrome frequently causes mental health impairment. Data in patients with adrenal incidentaloma (AI) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate psychiatric and neurocognitive functions in AI patients, in relation to the presence of subclinical hypercortisolism (SH), and the effect of adrenalectomy on mental health. DESIGN: We enrolled 62 AI patients (64.8 ±â€…8.9 years) referred to our centers. Subclinical hypercortisolism was diagnosed when cortisol after 1mg-dexamethasone suppression test was >50 nmol/L, in the absence of signs of overt hypercortisolism, in 43 patients (SH+). INTERVENTIONS: The structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, and 5 psychiatric scales were performed. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (Verbal and Working Memory, Token and Symbol Task, Verbal Fluency, Tower of London) was explored in 26 patients (≤65 years). RESULTS: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was 27.4% (SH+ 30.2% vs SH- 21.1%, P = 0.45). SH+ showed a higher prevalence of middle insomnia (by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) compared with SH- (51% vs 22%, P = 0.039). Considering the Sheehan Disability Scale, SH+ showed a higher disability score (7 vs 3, P = 0.019), higher perceived stress (4.2 ±â€…1.9 vs 2.9 ±â€…1.9, P = 0.015), and lower perceived social support (75 vs 80, P = 0.036) than SH-. High perceived stress was independently associated with SH (odds ratio [OR] = 5.46, confidence interval 95% 1.4-21.8, P = 0.016). Interestingly, SH+ performed better in verbal fluency (49.5 ±â€…38.9 vs 38.9 ±â€…9.0, P = 0.012), symbol coding (54.1 ±â€…6.7 vs 42.3 ±â€…15.5, P = 0.013), and Tower of London (15.1 vs 10.9, P = 0.009) than SH-. In 8 operated SH+, no significant changes were found. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical hypercortisolism may influence patients' mental health and cognitive performances, requiring an integrated treatment.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/blood , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/psychology , Hydrocortisone/blood , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Asymptomatic Diseases , Cognition Disorders/blood , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cohort Studies , Cushing Syndrome/complications , Cushing Syndrome/diagnosis , Cushing Syndrome/epidemiology , Cushing Syndrome/psychology , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Interview, Psychological , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Mental Disorders/blood , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Prevalence , Risk Factors
3.
Eur Psychiatry ; 61: 119-126, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31442739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research has consistently shown that language abilities represent a core dimension of psychosis; however, to date, very little is known about syntactic comprehension performance in the early stages of psychosis. This study aims to compare the linguistic abilities involved in syntactic comprehension in a large group of First Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: A multiple choice test of comprehension of syntax was administered to 218 FEP patients (166 non-affective FEP patients [FEP-NA] and 52 affective FEP patients [FEP-A]) and 106 HCs. All participants were asked to match a sentence they listen with one out of four vignettes on a pc screen. Only one vignette represents the stimulus target, while the others are grammatical or non-grammatical (visual) distractors. Both grammatical and non-grammatical errors and performance in different syntactic constructions were considered. RESULTS: FEP committed greater number of errors in the majority of TCGB language domains compared to HCs. Moreover, FEP-NA patients committed significantly more non-grammatical (z = -3.2, p = 0.007), locative (z = -4.7, p < 0.001), passive-negative (z = -3.2, p = 0.02), and relative (z = -4.6, p < 0.001) errors compared to HCs as well as more passive-affirmative errors compared to both HCs (z = -4.3, p < 0.001) and FEP-A (z = 3.1, p = 0.04). Finally, we also found that both FEP-NA and FEP-A committed more grammatical (FEP-NA: z = -9.2, p < 0.001 and FEP-A: z = -4.4, p < 0.001), total (FEP-NA: z = -8.2, p < 0.001 and FEP-A: z = 3.9, p =  0.002), and active-negative (FEP-NA: z = -5.8, p < 0.001 and FEP-A: z = -3.5, p = 0.01) errors compared to HCs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the access to syntactic structures is already impaired in FEP patients, especially in those with FEP-NA, ultimately suggesting that language impairments represent a core and inner feature of psychosis even at early stages.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Language Disorders/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Psychotic Disorders/physiopathology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Language , Language Disorders/psychology , Language Tests , Linguistics , Male , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Risk Factors , Vocabulary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...