Clinical and oncologic outcomes of posterior only total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastasis involving third lumbar vertebra: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: A posterior-only total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of the L3 level was deemed a highly intricate surgical procedure, necessitating the preservation of the L3 nerve root to prevent neurological deterioration. Despite bilateral preservation efforts of the L3 nerve roots, neurological deterioration proved unavoidable. This study aims to present the clinical, neurologic, and oncologic outcomes of spinal metastasis patients who underwent a posterior-only approach TES, encompassing the L3 vertebra. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with L3-involved spinal metastasis undergoing posterior TES between January 2018 and January 2022 were investigated. The primary outcomes considered were the local recurrence rate and manual muscle testing of the lumbar myotome. Secondary outcomes included Frankel neurological status, operative time, blood loss, perioperative and postoperative complications, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score. RESULTS: Five patients with TES involving L3 (three females) met the inclusion criteria. All patients had solitary metastases (three in the lungs, 2 in the breasts). Postoperatively, all patients experienced weakness of the hip flexors, but they were able to ambulate independently 12 months after surgery. One patient exhibited adjacent segment (L2) disease progression and underwent corpectomy 18 months after TES. No local recurrences at the surgical site were detected on magnetic resonance imaging at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Posterior-only TES for L3-involved vertebrae yielded excellent results in the local control of metastatic disease. Despite hip flexor weakness, all patients were able to regain independent ambulation after 12 months. TES can offer favorable clinical and oncological outcomes in patients with solitary spinal metastases.

Effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of the dual locking plate for femoral allograft fixation: finite element analysis and biomechanical study.

AIMS: Implant failure in allograft reconstruction is one of the most common problems after treating a large bone defect for a primary bone tumor. The study aimed to investigate the effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of dual locking plates used for femoral allograft fixation. METHODS: Four finite element (FE) models of the femur with a 1-mm bone gap were developed at the midshaft with different configurations of the 10-hole fixation dual locking plate (LP) with and without intramedullary bone cement augmentation. Model 1 was the dual LP at the lateral and medial aspect of the femur. Model 2 was Model 1 with bone cement augmentation. Model 3 was the dual LP at the anterior and lateral aspect of the femur. Finally, Model 4 was Model 3 with bone cement augmentation. All models were tested for stiffness under axial compression as well as torsional, lateral-medial, and anterior-posterior bending. In addition, the FE analyses were validated using biomechanical testing on a cadaveric femur. RESULTS: Model 2 had the greatest axial compression stiffness, followed by Models 1, 4, and 3. Bone cement augmentation in Models 2 and 4 had 3.5% and 2.4% greater axial stiffness than the non-augmentation Models 1 and 3, respectively. In the bone cement augmentation models, Model 2 had 11.9% greater axial compression stiffness than Model 4. CONCLUSION: The effect of bone cement augmentation increases construct stiffness less than the effect of the dual LP configuration. A dual lateral-medial LP with bone cement augmentation provides the strongest fixation of the femur in terms of axial compression and lateral bending stiffness.

Clinical results of total en bloc spondylectomy using a single posterior approach in spinal metastasis patients: Experiences from Thailand.

AIM: To demonstrate a single posterior approach, total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) could be performed safely without preoperative embolization in spinal metastasis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen solitary spinal metastasis patients (five males) underwent single posterior approach TES at the thoracolumbar spine without preoperative embolization from January 2018 to January 2020. The primary sites were the breast (n = 4), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 2), colon (n = 2), and others (n = 5). All patients underwent single posterior TES. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Frankel neurological status, operative time and blood loss, and any complications were all recorded. The patients were regularly followed-up with radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to detect any local recurrences. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 354.6 min, and the mean operative blood loss was 2134.62 ml. None of the patients experienced any perioperative complications. Within the follow-up period (3-24 months), no local recurrences were detected. Two patients (15.38%) were found to have distant metastasis to adjacent and remote vertebrae. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and three patients died of disease. Six patients showed an improved ECOG functional status by at least one grade. Four of Frankel A patients improved their neurological status by at least one grade. CONCLUSION: Even without embolization, single posterior TES at the thoracolumbar spine is safe and effective for short-term local control in solitary spinal metastasis. However, TES cannot prevent distant metastasis. Longer-term follow-up studies will be able to further identify the benefits of TES for the long-term local control of diseases.

Biomechanics comparison between endobutton fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for syndesmotic injury ankle fracture; a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study.

Introduction: Various syndesmotic fixation methods in ankle injury are recommended; however, a lack of biomechanical information persists regarding the stiffness of the fixation methods. The current study thus aimed to assess biomechanical cadaveric validation and perform a finite element analysis of syndesmotic fixation comparing endobutton vs. screw after syndesmotic injury with an ankle fracture. Method: Five pairs of ankles of fresh cadavers were used for the validity test for Anterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (AITFL), Posterior Inferior Tibiofibular Ligament (PITFL), and Interosseous ligament biomechanics properties. Four finite element models (FEM) were created: an intact model, a fracture model with/without syndesmotic injury, an endobutton fixation model, and a syndesmotic screw fixation model. Each FEM was tested vis-à-vis external rotation force, anteroposterior translation force, and compression force until model failure. The primary outcomes were stiffness and force until failure. Result: The respective anteroposterior translation force for the stiffness of the intact model, the screw fixation model, and the endobutton fixation was 8.14, 9.15, and 8.17 N/mm. The respective external rotation force for the stiffness of intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 0.927,0.949, and 0.940 Nm/degree. The respective stress under compression force in the intact, screw fixation, and endobutton model was 39.94,25.59, and 37.30 MPa. Conclusion: Both screw and endobutton fixation models provided more translation, compression, and rotation stability than normal syndesmosis, but the screw model provided greater translation and compression force stability than the endobutton model. There was no difference in rotational stability between the two models. We thus recommend the same rehabilitation protocol for both fixation methods; however, vigorous translation and compression should be avoided when using endobutton fixation.