Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 21(6): 409-12, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10572274

ABSTRACT

Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare nonfunctioning tumor consisting histologically of an admixture of adipose tissue and extramedullary hemopoietic elements within the adrenal glands. Less than 300 cases have been reported in the literature and only 15 case reports have described cytological findings of this tumor obtained by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We report a case of a 48-year-old male who had had anaplastic large cell carcinoma of the right lung. The left adrenal mass was encountered during a staging workup that led to a clinical suspicion of metastatic disease to the adrenal gland. FNA under computed tomography (CT) guidance was performed obtaining cytological material from which diagnosis of myelolipoma was made. The findings reemphasized an important role of FNA in investigation of adrenal mass. The literature on FNA cytology of adrenal myelolipoma is reviewed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1999;21:409-412.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/pathology , Myelolipoma/pathology , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/physiopathology , Biopsy, Needle , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myelolipoma/diagnosis , Myelolipoma/physiopathology
3.
Drugs ; 42 Suppl 1: 44-50, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1718694

ABSTRACT

In order to ascertain the protective role of a potent calcium entry blocking agent in human acute renal failure, 10 patients were randomised to treatment with either intrarenal gallopamil plus intravenous furosemide (frusemide) 0.5 mg/kg/h for 24 hours, or furosemide alone. Gallopamil was infused into each kidney at the rate of 40 to 80 micrograms/min for 4 hours. During 7 days of post-treatment follow-up, the gallopamil treatment group exhibited a significantly higher urine output [257 ml/h vs 81 ml/h (p less than 0.001) after 2 days, and 199 ml/h vs 120 ml/h (p less than 0.005) after 7 days] and creatinine clearance [20 vs 4 ml/min (p less than 0.005) after 2 days, and 38 vs 14 ml/min (p less than 0.001) after 7 days] than the furosemide-only control group. Furthermore, gallopamil treatment accelerated the decline of serum creatinine after renal failure and reduced the requirement for dialysis. Although patient numbers were small, these results indicate that the addition of intrarenal gallopamil to intravenous furosemide treatment enhances the recovery of renal function after acute renal failure.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/drug therapy , Gallopamil/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Creatinine/blood , Drug Administration Routes , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Furosemide/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
Ren Fail ; 11(4): 201-8, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2485483

ABSTRACT

Cellular Ca2+ influx during the reperfusion period after an ischemic insult has been proposed to be a crucial pathogenetic factor in the development of experimental acute renal failure (ARF). The present study, therefore, examined the potential beneficial effect of intrarenal verapamil, a calcium entry blocking agent, on ARF in patients. Twelve patients were enrolled in the study. Six ARF patients (experimental group)--ARF caused by malaria (4 patients) and leptospirosis (2 patients)--had a catheter placed in their renal artery; verapamil was infused at 100 micrograms/min for 3 h and intravenous furosemide, 0.8 mg/kg/h x 24 h was also administered. Another six ARF patients (control group)--ARF caused by malaria (5 patients) and leptospirosis (1 patient)--were treated with intravenous furosemide alone. Baseline renal function was comparable in both groups; GFR (3.16 +/- 3.24 vs 0.7 +/- 1.5 mL/min, NS), serum creatinine (Scr), (9.1 +/- 2.1 vs 11.3 +/- 2.2 mg/dL, NS), and urine volume (V) (41.79 +/- 4.77 vs 34.54 +/- 13.52 mL/h, NS), were comparable in the experimental and control groups. Twenty-four hours posttreatment, the increment of GFR (9.66 +/- 4.25 vs 1.32 +/- 0.50 mL/min, P less than .02) and V (181.8 +/- 61.7 vs 79 +/- 18 mL/h, P less than .04), were significantly greater in the experimental group as compared to the control group. The course of ARF was also shorter in the experimental group (6.5 +/- 2.1 vs 13 +/- 1.1 days, P less than .05), who also required less dialysis. Thus, combination of a renal arterial infusion of verapamil and intravenous furosemide significantly improves the renal function in tropical ARF as compared to intravenous furosemide alone.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/drug therapy , Furosemide/therapeutic use , Verapamil/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Furosemide/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Verapamil/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...