Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Genet ; 75(6): 562-7, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19438934

ABSTRACT

Using Affymetrix 10K arrays, we searched for regions of homozygosity in 51 Turkish families including at least three members with either congenital or prelingual autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (ARNSSNHL), and identified four families whose deafness mapped to the DFNB6 locus on 3p21 containing the TMIE gene. Mutation analysis revealed the p.R84W mutation in all four families. Screening of this mutation in 254 families with ARNSSNHL, without GJB2 mutations, revealed four additional affected families. A novel mutation was found in a non-complementary marriage between a deaf couple who were homozygous for p.R84W and p.W57X, respectively with two affected children who were compound heterozygotes. Six of the TMIE families originated from southeastern Anatolia, making p.R84W a common cause of hearing loss in that region with a relative frequency of 10.3% (95% CI is 2.5-18.1%). The overall prevalence of the p.R84W mutation in ARNSSNHL in Turkey is 2.4% (95% CI is 0.7-4.0%). Genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms flanking the TMIE gene revealed a conserved haplotype, suggesting a single origin for p.R84W from a common ancestor 1250 years ago (95% CI is 650-2500 years). We conclude that p.R84W could be a common mutation in other Middle Eastern populations and should be included in mutation screening offered to individuals with ARNSSNHL.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Point Mutation , Amino Acid Substitution , Base Sequence , Connexin 26 , Connexins , DNA/analysis , DNA/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , Gene Frequency , Genetic Testing , Genome, Human , Haplotypes , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Jpn Heart J ; 42(2): 185-91, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11384079

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and tolerability of recommended initial doses of fosinopril (FOS) with those of captopril (CAP), in diuretic-treated, salt depleted "high risk" patients with congestive heart failure. Thirty patients were randomized in a double blind fashion to receive a single dose of either FOS 10 mg, CAP 6.25 mg or placebo. CAP produced a significant early and brief fall in BP, while the first-dose hypotensive response with FOS did not differ significantly from placebo. Baseline plasma angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity was similar in all groups. Only CAP showed an acute and significant fall in plasma ACE activity, whereas FOS and placebo did not change ACE activity. There was no correlation between mean arterial pressure or percentile change in mean arterial pressure and plasma ACE activity. Also no correlation was found between high or low ACE activity level and first dose hypotension. The practical importance of the results are: For patients with congestive heart failure. FOS and CAP have different effects on BP after the first dose, and this effect may be dependent on the plasma ACE activity level. FOS produces ACE inhibition and BP changes similar to placebo so it is the safer choice for the treatment of congestive heart failure.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Captopril/administration & dosage , Fosinopril/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Aged , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...