Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.

Background: The International Study of Wheezing in Infants defines recurrent wheezing as the presence of three or more medically documented episodes of wheezing within one year. To date, there is no evidence on the use of hypertonic saline (HS) combined with airway clearance techniques (ACT) for children with recurrent wheezing treated in an outpatient setting. Therefore, this is the first study to explore the use of such interventions in infants with recurrent wheezing. Objectives: To evaluate the effects and safety of a three-month protocol including HS and ACT for non-hospitalized infants with recurrent wheezing. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, including outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing. Children were randomized to either 3% HS or 0.9% saline groups and were treated with bronchodilator and nebulized with the respective solutions before ACT. The primary outcome was the Wang score. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospitalizations and respiratory crisis, need for rescue medication, and school absences. All variables were measured during the three previous months from inclusion and during intervention period. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04331496) on March, 31, 2020. Results: Forty children were included. Regarding immediate effects, significant differences (p<0.001) were found for time, but not for group or interaction (group × time), in all outcome variables (increase in SpO2, decrease in heart and respiratory rate, wheezing episodes, retraction, and Wang score). Comparing the previous three months with the study period, there were significant differences in both groups for the severity of crisis (p<0.001) and medication steps (p=0.002). Conclusion: A three-month protocol including HS and ACT for outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing was safe and reduced morbidity. No differences were found between the use of HS and 0.9% saline.

V232D mutation in patients with cystic fibrosis: Not so rare, not so mild.

The frequency of some Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Transmembrane Conductance Regulator gene (CFTR) mutations varies between populations. Genetic testing during newborn screening (NBS) for CF can identify less common mutations with low clinical expression in childhood and previously considered mild but not fully characterized, such as the mutation p.Val232Asp (c.695T > A). The aim of this study was to describe CF patients with the V232D mutation. We identify CF children with the V232D mutation detected by NBS and compare them with CF adults with this mutation whose diagnosis was prompted by clinical symptoms in the same period. We studied clinical, biochemical, spirometric, and prognostic features in both populations. NBS program tested 276,523 children during a period of 14 years (2003-2017) and identified 54 cases of CF. Six children (11%) had the V232D mutation. Over the same period, 5 adults (age 37.6 ±â€Š16.29 years old) with symptoms of CF and this mutation were also diagnosed. Follow-up duration was mean 10.1 years for adults and mean 6.5 years for children. In the adult group, lung function was impaired at diagnosis in all patients (Forced Expiratory Volume1-FEV1-67.12% ±â€Š13.09) and worsened in children tested during evolution (FEV1first: 113%; FEV1last: 64%). Pancreatic insufficiency was present in adult group, with recurrent pancreatitis in 1 present. Although with less clinical expression in children, V232D is associated with pulmonary and pancreatic involvement during adulthood and CF cannot be considered mild. This mutation is present in 11% of all patients diagnosed with CF in our region. Its inclusion in some NBS programs should be taken into account in order to improve the prognosis of affected children.