Cardiogenic pulmonary edema - is it lone cardiogenic? "Missing link" between hemodynamic and other existing mechanisms.

The current traditional pathophysiologic concept of pulmonary edema of cardiogenic origin explains its development by a hydrostatic effect due to increased pulmonary capillary pressure resulting in fluid flux to alveolar and interstitial areas from capillaries. However, several experimental studies and clinical data of poor response to hemodynamic and diuretic treatment in many scenarios provide further evidence of the involvement of several other contributing factors to the development of cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Several experimental and clinical studies have found that sympathetic overactivity with elevated plasma catecholamine concentrations may play an important role in the development of cardiovascular-associated pulmonary edema. Catecholamine-induced pulmonary injury may be one of the key mechanisms in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema triggering proinflammatory cytokine overactivation, oxidative stress and myocardial injury. In the everyday treatment of acute heart failure, physicians should consider the possibility of other noncardiogenic mechanisms involved in the progression of acute pulmonary edema, particularly catecholamine overactivity, lymphatic drainage, inflammatory and oxidative stress, high surfactant protein. The classic, hemodynamic treatment approach in pulmonary edema with the coexistence of other contributing factors may not provide adequate clinical benefit during treatment.

Optimization of heart rate lowering therapy in hospitalized patients with heart failure: Insights from the Optimize Heart Failure Care Program.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization is an opportunity to optimize heart failure (HF) therapy. As optimal treatment for hospitalized HF patients in sinus rhythm with heart rate≥70bpm is unclear, we investigated the impact of combined beta-blocker (BB) and ivabradine versus BBs alone on short and longer term mortality and rehospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 370 hospitalized HF patients with heart rate≥70bpm (150 BB+ivabradine, 220 BB alone) in the Optimize Heart Failure Care Program in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan, from October 2015 to April 2016. RESULTS: At 1month, 3months, 6months and 12months, there were fewer deaths, HF hospitalizations and overall hospitalizations in patients on BB+ivabradine vs BBs alone. At 12months, all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization was significantly lower with BB+ivabradine than BBs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.64, P<0.0001). Significantly greater improvement was seen in quality of life (QOL) from admission to 12months with BB+ivabradine vs BBs alone (P=0.0001). With BB+ivabradine, significantly more patients achieved ≥50% target doses of BBs at 12months than on admission (82.0% vs 66.6%, P=0.0001), but the effect was non-significant with BBs alone. CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate lowering therapy with BB+ivabradine started in hospitalized HF patients (heart rate≥70bpm) is associated with reduced overall mortality and re-hospitalization over the subsequent 12months. A prospective randomized trial is needed to confirm the advantages of this strategy.