Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37363621

ABSTRACT

Reactive arthritis (ReA) following Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection has been described mainly in adults, and only two pediatric cases have been reported. We report a third case where ReA was found to be a sequela following COVID-19 infection. A 15-year-old right-handed Caucasian girl presented with severe left-wrist pain. She was experiencing fever, rash, and migratory oligoarthritis, and laboratory work-up showed elevated inflammatory markers and a positive COVID-19 IgG antibody test. Imaging revealed inflammatory arthropathy with wrist synovitis. The patient was diagnosed with ReA following COVID-19 infection and was treated surgically by wrist arthroscopic synovectomy after the failure of conservative management. It has been 1 year after her surgery, and she is doing well. Emerging case reports are linking ReA as a delayed response to COVID-19 infection; therefore, ReA should be included in the list of differential diagnoses in all patients with joint pain following COVID-19 infection.

2.
Ochsner J ; 23(1): 16-20, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36936486

ABSTRACT

Background: Refractory symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome can persist or reoccur after carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery in 1% to 25% of patients, with up to 12% of patients requiring secondary surgery. If revision surgery is required, the results are much less successful compared to primary surgery. In this study, we investigated whether cryopreserved human umbilical cord allograft placement during CTR revision surgery improved short- and long-term surgical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-center cohort analysis of patients between January 2015 and July 2018 who underwent secondary open revision CTR with umbilical cord allograft for recurrent or persistent compression neuropathy of the median nerve. Surgical outcomes of patients in the study group-reduction of pain, paresthesia, and weakness; complications; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores-were compared to the outcomes of controls without umbilical cord allograft use who were operated on by the same surgeon between December 2011 and September 2015. Results: A total of 37 patients underwent CTR with (n=26) and without (n=11) umbilical cord allograft (mean follow-up of 4 years). Following surgery, preoperative symptoms of pain (96% vs 73%, P=0.048) and paresthesia (100% vs 73%, P=0.014) were significantly improved in the patients who received umbilical cord allograft. Mean QuickDASH scores (19.0 vs 23.7, P=0.58) and preoperative weakness (90% vs 67%, P=0.14) were improved in the patients who received umbilical cord allograft but were nonsignificant. Short- and long-term complications were similar between groups (P=0.56, P=0.51, respectively). Conclusion: This study suggests that human umbilical cord allograft placement during open revision CTR is safe and effective for improving long-term symptoms of compressive neuropathy in patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.

3.
Hand (N Y) ; 17(4): NP7-NP11, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34963324

ABSTRACT

Catfish have the ability to inflict stings on their victims through spines located on their dorsal and pectoral fins. The stings of catfish can release toxins that have dermonecrotic, edemogenic, and vasospastic factors. In this case, a 56-year-old man suffered a catfish sting to his right thumb, which resulted in acute hand compartment syndrome and resultant hand fasciotomies. His hospital course was complicated by multiple irrigation and debridements, finger amputations, hand fluid cultures positive for Vibrio damsela, and eventual wrist disarticulation. The combination of envenomation, infection, and delayed presentation for treatment ultimately led to a hand amputation.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Catfishes , Compartment Syndromes , Animals , Bites and Stings/complications , Bites and Stings/surgery , Compartment Syndromes/etiology , Disarticulation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Wrist
4.
Hand (N Y) ; 16(2): 201-209, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155938

ABSTRACT

Background: Anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) palsy is a very uncommon cause of upper extremity pain and weakness that comprises less than 1% of all upper extremity nerve palsies. Rarely reported but also mentioned in the literature is AIN palsy after shoulder arthroscopy. Methods: A systematic review of the literature to date using PubMed was conducted to identify patients who suffered AIN palsy after shoulder arthroscopy procedures. Articles included met the following criteria: (1) published in English; (2) primary presentation of the data; (3) patients had undergone shoulder arthroscopy before developing symptoms of AIN palsy; and (4) diagnosis was confirmed with clinical symptoms of AIN palsy. Measured outcomes included patient demographics, specific shoulder procedure, anesthesia procedure, intra-operative patient positioning, intra-operative compressive dressing, intra-operative traction, surgical versus conservative treatment, abnormal findings during decompression procedure, proposed mechanism of injury, and follow-up. Results: The search yielded 6 articles, of which 4 (13 cases) met inclusion criteria. An additional 2 cases were included in this report totaling 15 cases. The average patient age was 49 years (range: 31-64) with 73% males. At average follow-up of 24 months, 67% of patients experienced complete resolution of symptoms-more than half of which underwent surgical decompression. Patients who failed to progress experienced weakness of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus muscles. Conclusions: Proposed injury mechanisms for AIN palsy after shoulder arthroscopy range from mechanical trauma, compressive hematoma, and direct anesthetic neurotoxicity. Management should be directed by clinical symptoms, imaging, and patient factors with majority of patients expected to have excellent clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy , Shoulder , Adult , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Decompression, Surgical , Female , Forearm , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paralysis/etiology
5.
Ochsner J ; 20(2): 215-218, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32612479

ABSTRACT

Background: Isolated dislocation of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joints is a rare injury that accounts for less than 1% of hand injuries. Few cases of isolated volar dislocations of the fifth CMC joint have been reported, making such injuries worthy of reporting. Given the rarity of these injuries, they are easily overlooked in the emergency setting and thus require a high index of clinical suspicion. Case Report: A 57-year-old female sustained an isolated volar dislocation of the fifth CMC joint when she fell onto her outstretched right hand. Physical examination revealed an inability to move the fifth digit, and the patient reported severe pain over the ulnar aspect of her right hand. X-rays of the right wrist revealed the dislocation. The patient was managed with closed reduction and application of an ulnar gutter splint. Conclusion: Solitary dislocations of any CMC joint are less common than simultaneous dislocation of multiple CMC joints, especially at the fifth CMC joint with volar dislocation. Because of the potential long-term adverse effects of untreated dislocations, these injuries must not be overlooked. Thus, patients presenting to the emergency department after traumatic injury involving an axial loading force to the hand should be carefully evaluated.

6.
Ochsner J ; 16(4): 436-442, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27999499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity surgery is commonly performed in the ambulatory setting and is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. METHODS: Patients scheduled for upper extremity orthopedic surgery with a peripheral nerve block were randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided single-injection supraclavicular block or ultrasound-guided median, ulnar, and radial nerve blocks (forearm blocks) performed at the level of the mid to proximal forearm with liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) combined with a short-acting supraclavicular block. A sham block was performed in an attempt to blind enrollees in the control group. We administered the EuroQol 5D-5L questionnaire preoperatively and on postoperative days 1-3 and considered the results the primary outcome of our investigation. Block procedure times, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, instances of nausea/vomiting, need for narcotic administration, and patient satisfaction were also assessed. RESULTS: We observed no significant differences in postoperative EuroQol scores between the 2 groups and no significant differences in patient demographics, PACU length of stay, or side effects in the PACU. In some instances, the short-acting supraclavicular block resolved in the PACU, and these patients reported higher pain scores and required titration of analgesics prior to discharge. CONCLUSION: Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine is currently only approved for local anesthetic infiltration use.

7.
J Hand Surg Am ; 41(10): 969-977, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27524691

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Limited data exist regarding the role of perineural blockade of the distal median, ulnar, and radial nerves as a primary anesthetic in patients undergoing hand surgery. We conducted a prospective and randomized pilot study to compare these techniques to brachial plexus blocks as a primary anesthetic in this patient population. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for hand surgery were randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or axillary nerve block (brachial plexus blocks) or ultrasound-guided median, ulnar, and radial nerve blocks performed at the level of the mid to proximal forearm (forearm blocks). The ability to undergo surgery without analgesic or local anesthetic supplementation was the primary outcome. Block procedure times, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, instances of nausea/vomiting, and need for narcotic administration were also assessed. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of the need for conversion to general anesthesia or analgesic or local anesthetic supplementation, with only 1 patient in the forearm block group and 2 in the brachial plexus block group requiring local anesthetic supplementation or conversion to general anesthesia. Similar durations in surgical and tourniquet times were also observed. Both groups reported similarly low numerical rating scale pain scores as well as the need for postoperative analgesic administration (2 patients in the forearm block group and 1 in the brachial plexus block group reported numerical rating scale pain scores > 0 and required opioid administration in the postanesthesia care unit). Block procedure characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Forearm blocks may be used as a primary anesthetic in patients undergoing hand surgery. Further research is warranted to determine the appropriateness of these techniques in patients undergoing surgery in the thumb or proximal to the hand. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.


Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus Block/methods , Forearm/surgery , Hand/surgery , Pain Measurement , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adult , Female , Hand/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/methods , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Clin Anesth ; 31: 1-4, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27185666

ABSTRACT

Acute compartment syndrome is a condition that may result in sensorimotor deficits and loss of function of the affected limb as a result of ischemic injury. It is considered a surgical emergency and prompt diagnosis and treatment results in more favorable outcomes. The use of regional anesthesia is controversial in patients at risk for compartment syndrome due to concern of its potential to mask symptoms of the condition. A 44-year-old African American male presented to surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of a comminuted distal radius fracture. As part of an off-label, investigator-initiated, and institutional review board-approved study, he received a perineural injection of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) around the median, ulnar, and radial nerves at the level of the proximal forearm. The following morning, his initial complaints of numbness and incisional pain progressively evolved into worsening numbness, diffuse discomfort, and pain with passive movement. A diagnosis of compartment syndrome was made and he underwent an emergency fasciotomy. The diagnosis of compartment syndrome requires a high index of suspicion and prompt treatment. This patient's changing pattern of symptoms-rather than his pain complaints alone-resulted in the diagnosis of compartment syndrome treated with emergent fasciotomy in spite of finger numbness that was initially attributed to the liposomal bupivacaine. While the use of liposomal bupivacaine did not preclude the diagnosis of compartment syndrome in our patient, it should be used with caution in patients at risk for compartment syndrome until additional data, particularly regarding block characteristics, are available.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Bupivacaine/adverse effects , Compartment Syndromes/chemically induced , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Compartment Syndromes/diagnosis , Drug Carriers , Humans , Liposomes , Male , Nerve Block/methods , Radius Fractures/surgery
9.
Hand (N Y) ; 10(2): 197-204, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26034430

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding the use of peripheral nerve blockade at the level of the forearm, and most studies regard these procedures as rescue techniques for failed or incomplete blocks. The purpose of the study was to investigate patients undergoing hand surgery with distal peripheral nerve (forearm) blocks and compare them with patients having similar procedures under more proximal brachial plexus blockade. No investigations comparing distal nerve blockade to proximal approaches are currently reported in the literature. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who had undergone hand surgery with a peripheral nerve block between November 2012 and October 2013. The primary outcome was the ability to provide a primary anesthetic without the need for general anesthesia or local anesthetic supplementation by the surgical team. Secondary outcome measures included narcotic administration during the block and intraoperative procedures, block performance times, and the need for rescue analgesics in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: No statistical difference in conversion rates to general anesthesia was observed between the two groups. Total opiate administration for the block and surgical procedure was lower in the forearm block group. There was no difference in block performance times or need for rescue analgesics in the PACU. CONCLUSIONS: Forearm blocks are viable alternatives to proximal blockade and are effective as a primary anesthetic technique in patients undergoing hand surgery. Compared to the more proximal approaches, these blocks have the benefits of not causing respiratory compromise, the ability to be performed bilaterally, and may be safer in anticoagulated patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...