Polyomavirus exerts detrimental effects on renal function in patients after lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation (LTX). Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is the leading cause of CKD. After kidney transplantation, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is a well-recognized problem. This study aims to evaluate the role of polyomavirus in patients after LTX. METHODS: From January 2017 to January 2020, all lung transplant recipients who performed follow-up visits in our center were included in the study and retrospectively assessed. We measured renal function (creatinine levels before and after transplantation), JCPyV, and BKPyV load by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in serum and urine samples after transplantation. RESULTS: In total, 104 consecutive patients (59 males, 56.7%) with a mean age of 49.6 ± 11.1 years were identified. JCPyV was found in urine of 36 patients (34.6%) and serum of 3 patients (2.9%). BKPyV was found in urine of 40 patients (38.5%) and serum of 4 patients (3.8%), respectively. Urine evidence for JCPyV (p < 0.001, coefficient: +21.44) and BKPyV (p < 0.001, coefficient: +29.65) correlated highly with further kidney function decline. CONCLUSION: Kidney function deterioration is associated with JCPyV and BKPyV viruria in patients after LTX. This might indicate a role of PyVAN in lung transplant recipients.

High prevalence of falsely declaring nicotine abstinence in lung transplant candidates.

Tobacco use after lung transplantation is associated with adverse outcome. Therefore, active smoking is regarded as a contraindication for lung transplantation and should be excluded prior to placement on the waiting list. The aim of the study was to compare self-reporting with a systematic cotinine based screening approach to identify patients with active nicotine abuse. Nicotine use was systematically assessed by interviews and cotinine test in all lung transplant candidates at every visit in our center. Patients were classified according to the stage prior to transplantation and cotinine test results were compared to self-reports and retrospectively analyzed until June 2019. Of 620 lung transplant candidates, 92 patients (14.8%) had at least one positive cotinine test. COPD as underlying disease (OR 2.102, CI 1.110-3.981; p = 0.023), number of pack years (OR 1.014, CI 1.000-1.028; p = 0.047) and a time of cessation less than one year (OR 2.413, CI 1.410-4.128; p = 0.001) were associated with a positive cotinine test in multivariable regression analysis. The majority of non-COPD patients (n = 13, 72.2%) with a positive test had a cessation time of less than one year. 78 patients (84.7%) falsely declared not consuming any nicotine-based products prior to the test. Finally, all never smokers were test negative. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that active nicotine use is prevalent in transplant candidates with a high prevalence of falsely declaring nicotine abstinence. COPD was the main diagnosis in affected patients. Short cessation time and a high number of pack years are risk factors for continued nicotine abuse.

Lung transplantation in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension-Focus on right ventricular remodelling.

OBJECTIVE: This study was meant to analyse the centre experience of the Munich Lung Transplant Group in lung transplantation of patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Outcome data focus on survival and right heart remodelling. METHODS: All patients receiving a lung transplant between 10/2010 and 08/2016 were retrospectively analysed (n = 343). Patients were categorised into individuals with or without severe pre-operative pulmonary hypertension (PH; mPAP ≥ 35 mm Hg or mPAP ≥ 25 mm Hg with cardiac index < 2.0 L/min/m2 ). Among those, patients with severe PH secondary to lung disease (Nice Class III) were compared with patients with severe PH due to idiopathic PH (IPAH; Nice Class I). All surviving patients with severe PH were electively followed up by echocardiography. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities after lung transplantation of each group according to pre-operative mPAP values showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.14 by log-rank test). Lung transplantation in severe PH patients led to marked right ventricular remodelling as indicated by significantly increased tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (P = 0.002), decreased right ventricular end-diastolic dimensions (P = 0.001) and overall reduction in tricuspid valvular regurgitation, when compared to pre-operative assessments. CONCLUSION: Sequential bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension is a feasible treatment option in this high-risk group in experienced high-volume centres. Lung transplantation allows for resolution of secondary right heart failure in these patients.

Pirfenidone exerts beneficial effects in patients with IPF undergoing single lung transplantation.

Pirfenidone demonstrated pleiotropic antiinflammatory effects in various experimental and clinical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of previous treatment with pirfenidone on short-term outcomes after single lung transplantation (SLTx). Therefore, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who were undergoing SLTx were screened retrospectively for previous use of pirfenidone and compared to respective controls. Baseline parameters and short-term outcomes were recorded and analyzed. In total, 17 patients with pirfenidone were compared with 26 patients without antifibrotic treatment. Baseline characteristics and severity of disease did not differ between groups. Use of pirfenidone did not increase blood loss, wound-healing, or anastomotic complications. Severity of primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours was less (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.4 ± 1.3, P = .002), and length of mechanical ventilation (37.5 ± 34.8 vs 118.5 ± 151.0 hours, P = .016) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (6.6 ± 7.1 vs 15.6 ± 20.3, P = .089) were shorter in patients with pirfenidone treatment. An independent beneficial effect of pirfenidone was confirmed by regression analysis while controlling for confounding variables (P = .016). Finally, incidence of acute cellular rejections within the first 30 days after SLTx was lower in patients with previous pirfenidone treatment (0.0% vs 19.2%; P = .040). Our data suggest a beneficial role of previous use of pirfenidone in patients with IPF who were undergoing SLTx.

Predicting the Necessity for Extracorporeal Circulation During Lung Transplantation: A Feasibility Study.

OBJECTIVE: The factors leading to the implementation of unplanned extracorporeal circulation during lung transplantation are poorly defined. Consequently, the authors aimed to identify patients at risk for unplanned extracorporeal circulation during lung transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. SETTING: Single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A development data set of 170 consecutive patients and an independent validation cohort of 52 patients undergoing lung transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: The authors investigated a cohort of 170 consecutive patients undergoing single or sequential bilateral lung transplantation without a priori indication for extracorporeal circulation and evaluated the predictive capability of distinct preoperative and intraoperative variables by using automated model building techniques at three clinically relevant time points (preoperatively, after endotracheal intubation, and after establishing single-lung ventilation). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure was the strongest predictor for unplanned extracorporeal circulation. A logistic regression model based on preoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure and lung allocation score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85. Consequently, the authors developed a novel 3-point scoring system based on preoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure and lung allocation score, which identified patients at risk for unplanned extracorporeal circulation and validated this score in an independent cohort of 52 patients undergoing lung transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors showed that patients at risk for unplanned extracorporeal circulation during lung transplantation could be identified by their novel 3-point score.

Core Muscle Size Predicts Postoperative Outcome in Lung Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Careful patient selection is the prerequisite to raise transplant benefit. In lung transplant (LT) candidates, the effect of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative outcome remains controversial, possibly due to the inaccuracy of BMI in discriminating between fat and muscle mass. We therefore hypothesized that assessment of body composition by muscle mass measures is more accurate than by BMI regarding postoperative outcome. METHODS: All LT recipients from 2011 to 2014 were included and retrospectively analyzed. Lean psoas area (LPA) was assessed from pretransplant computed tomography scans, and associations with postoperative outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Included were 103 consecutive LT recipients with a mean pre-LT BMI of 22.0 ± 4.0 kg/m(2) and a mean LPA of 22.3 ± 8.3 cm(2). LPA was inversely associated with length of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.03), requirement of tracheostomy (p = 0.035), and length of stay in the intensive care unit (p = 0.02), while controlling for underlying disease, BMI, sex, age, and procedure; in contrast, BMI was not (p = 0.25, p = 0.54, and p = 0.42, respectively.). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the 6-minute walk distance at the end of pulmonary rehabilitation was significantly associated with LPA (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: LPA can easily be assessed in LT candidates as part of pretransplant evaluation and was significantly associated with short-term outcome, whereas BMI was not. Assessment of LPA may provide additional information on body composition beyond BMI. However, the clinical utility has to be further evaluated.

Munich lung transplant group: waiting list during the first 9 months of the lung allocation score era.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The Eurotransplant Foundation introduced the lung allocation score (LAS) in Germany on December 10, 2011. We analyzed characteristics of the Munich Lung Transplant Group (MLTG) waiting list during the first 9 months after the introduction of the LAS. RESULTS: A mean number of 39 ± 1 patients were constantly listed for lung transplantation and 60 transplants were performed by the MLTG during the observation period. While the majority (42 ± 0%) of patients waiting for transplant comprised chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/emphysema patients, only 26% of transplanted patients suffered from COPD/emphysema. Instead, the majority (42%) of transplanted patients suffered from interstitial lung disease. Waiting times did not markedly change in the LAS era. Notably, patients with interstitial lung disease had shorter waiting times when compared with patients suffering from COPD/emphysema and cystic fibrosis, both on the waiting list and at the time of transplant. CONCLUSION: The MLTG lung transplant waiting list has not markedly changed during the first 9 months after the introduction of the LAS. Our data indicate that the LAS accommodates disease-specific patient statuses well. Although patients with interstitial lung disease are preferably transplanted, the LAS system provides a very reasonable basis to also list and transplant COPD/emphysema patients.