Does exercise training improve exercise tolerance, quality of life, and echocardiographic parameters in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often experience dyspnea, decreased exercise tolerance, and decreased quality of life (QOL). Exercise training is a promising non-pharmacological treatment, with some improvement in exercise tolerance and QOL in HFpEF patients in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs examining the effect of exercise therapy on exercise tolerance, QOL, and echocardiographic parameters in patients with HFpEF. Article database search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials identified 15 publications representing 579 unique patients. Results are presented as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Exercise training (compared to control) demonstrated a significant improvement in exercise tolerance as measured by peak absolute VO2 (WMD [95% CI] = 164.67 [65.54, 263.79] mL/min), peak relative VO2 (WMD [95% CI] = 1.85 [0.98, 2.73] mL/min/kg), workload (WMD [95% CI] = 12.92 [4.67, 21.17] W), exercise time (WMD [95% CI] = 2.05 [1.57, 2.53] min), anaerobic threshold (WMD [95% CI] = 170.31 [35.40, 305.22] mL/min/kg), and 6-min walk test distance (WMD [95% CI] = 32.77 [20.72, 44.83] m); in QOL as measured by Short Form (SF-36) physical functioning domain (WMD [95% CI] = 9.95 [2.85, 17.05]) and SF-36 vitality domain (WMD [95% CI] = 6.24 [0.15, 12.34]); and in the echocardiographic measure of LVESD (WMD [95% CI] = - 0.16 [- 0.28, - 0.04] cm). In conclusion, we found after systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs that exercise therapy improves exercise tolerance and physical-related quality of life measures.

ICD shocks and complications in patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the long-term outcomes of ICDs in patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes. METHODS: Prospective registry study of inherited arrhythmia patients with an ICD. Incidence of therapies and complications were measured as 5-year cumulative incidence proportions and analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidence was compared by device indication, diagnosis type and device type. Cox-regression analysis was used to identify predictors of appropriate shock and device complication. RESULTS: 123 patients with a mean follow up of 6.4 ± 4.8 years were included. The incidence of first appropriate shock was 56.52% vs 24.44%, p < 0.05 for cardiomyopathy and channelopathy patients, despite similar ejection fraction (61% vs 60%, p = 0.6). The incidence of first inappropriate shock was 13.46% vs 56.25%, p < 0.01 for single vs. multi-lead devices. The incidence of first lead complication was higher for multi-lead vs. single lead devices, 43.75% vs. 17.31%, p = 0.04. Patients with an ICD for secondary prevention were more likely to receive an appropriate shock than those with primary prevention indication (HR 2.21, CI 1.07-4.56, p = 0.03). Multi-lead devices were associated with higher risk of inappropriate shock (HR 3.99, CI 1.27-12.52, p = 0.02), with similar appropriate shock risk compared to single lead devices. In 26.5% of patients with dual chamber devices, atrial sensing or pacing was not utilized. CONCLUSION: The rate of appropriate therapies and ICD complications in patients with inherited arrhythmia is high, particularly in cardiomyopathies with multi-lead devices. Risk-benefit ratio should be carefully considered when assessing the indication and type of device in this population.

A Case of Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Complement-Mediated Myopericarditis From Influenza B Infection.

Influenza B is a rare cause of myocarditis that is usually caused by histiocytic and mononuclear cellular infiltrates. We describe a 22-year-old female patient presenting with fulminant myopericarditis secondary to influenza B infection that deteriorated to cardiogenic shock. Endomyocardial biopsy results yielded myocardial necrosis through complement-mediated cellular injury without evidence of interstitial infiltrates. The rare cause of this patient's disease, along with the unique pathologic findings, are an important reminder of the diversity of potential findings in myocarditis.