Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
JAAPA ; 36(10): 10-15, 2023 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751250

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often are overlooked or misinterpreted, but without treatment, patients are at increased risk for potentially life-threatening conditions including stroke and heart failure. Clinician awareness of the risk factors for and treatment of OSA can prevent the development or progression of these complications in patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Stroke , Humans , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Heart Failure/etiology , Risk Factors , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control
2.
J Physician Assist Educ ; 34(3): 231-234, 2023 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37647229

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: (1) To describe how often physician assistant (PA) students correctly identify prescribing errors and (2) examine between-cohort differences on ability to correctly identify prescribing errors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 2 cohorts of PA students at one institution. Students were presented with 3 hypothetical prescriptions, 2 of which contained a prescribing error. For each prescription, students were asked to (1) identify whether an error occurred and (2) indicate the type of error. A simple Poisson regression model analyzed the data. RESULTS: We received responses from 130 students (72.6% response rate). Approximately 12% (12.3%, n = 16) correctly identified whether all 3 prescriptions were correct. The median number of correctly identified prescriptions was 1 (interquartile range = 1). There was not a statistically significant between-cohort difference identifying the correct number of prescriptions (ß = 0.27, P = .10). CONCLUSION: Physician assistant students' prescribing error identification was similar to previous research in medical and nursing students. Efforts to improve prescribing training are critical to ensure patient safety.


Subject(s)
Physician Assistants , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Physician Assistants/education , Prescriptions , Students
4.
J Physician Assist Educ ; 34(2): 147-151, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37133895

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The physician assistant (PA) literature has focused on the implications of creating an entry-level doctoral degree; however, there is scant primary literature on postprofessional doctorates, which are becoming more popular as the number of institutions offering them increases. The purposes of this project were to: (1) describe interest and motivation of currently practicing PAs to enroll in a postprofessional doctorate program and (2) identify the most- and least-preferred attributes of a postprofessional doctorate program. METHODS: This was a quantitative cross-sectional survey of recent alumni from one institution. Measures included interest in obtaining a postprofessional doctorate, a nonrandomized Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) exercise, and motivators for enrolling in a postprofessional doctorate. The main outcome of interest was the BWS standardized score for each attribute. RESULTS: The research team received 172 eligible responses (n = 172, response rate = 25.83%). Results indicate that 47.67% of respondents (n = 82) expressed interest in a postprofessional doctorate. The most preferred doctorate program attribute was a clinically based program, ending with a residency, conferring a Doctor of Medical Science (DMSc) degree, with a hybrid course delivery. DISCUSSION: This sample included various interests, motivations, and preferred program attributes. Understanding these factors may help inform the design and redesign of doctoral programs.


Subject(s)
Medicine , Physician Assistants , Physicians , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Attitude of Health Personnel , Physician Assistants/education
5.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 19(1): 69-74, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36153236

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) Present the factor structure of two psychometric instruments for self-efficacy and one for outcome expectations of medication prescribing; (2) evaluate the reliability of the scales, and (3) present preliminary evidence of validity. METHODS: Physician assistants (PA) and PA students completed a survey evaluating three psychometric instruments: (1) Self-Efficacy in Prescribing (SEP), (2) Self-Efficacy in Prescribing-Geriatric (SEPG), and (3) Outcomes Expectations of Prescribing Errors (OEP). Students also evaluated 3 hypothetical prescriptions, two of which contained a prescribing error. Students were instructed to identify (1) if an error occurred and (2) what type of error. The data were analyzed using parallel analysis with a varimax rotation, Cronbach's α, Pearson and Spearman correlations. RESULTS: One hundred eighty five (n = 185) respondents completed the survey (response rate = 63.8%). The parallel analysis found that the SEP had one 7-item factor with α = 0.94 (M = 5.7 (SD = 1.9) out of 10). The SEPG also had one 7-item factor with α = 0.95 (M = 5.5 (1.9). The OEP had one 6-item factor with α = 0.89 (M = 3.5 (SD = 0.8) out of 5). The SEP and SEPG, were correlated to the OEP each other (both p < 0.01). Actively practicing PAs had the highest composite mean SEP and SEPG scores. First-year PA students had the highest mean scores for the OEP. There was a weak association between the mean SEPG score and the number of correctly identified prescriptions (rs = 0.18, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The SEP, SEPG, and OEP show preliminary evidence of reliability and structural, construct, and known-group validities using simulated prescriptions. These tools may be able to be used by educators and implementation scientists as one method to show the effectiveness of future interventions to reduce incidence of prescribing errors.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions , Physician Assistants , Humans , Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Physician Assist Educ ; 33(2): 127-130, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35616690

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe a standardized clinical reasoning (CR) assessment process for preclinical physician assistant (PA) students; (2) describe student grades on a checklist by comparing clinical faculty members' judgment on a global rating scale (GRS) with judgments made by a faculty panel; and (3) evaluate interrater reliability between individual faculty members' grading and faculty panel grading. METHODS: Three clinical faculty members created a checklist to assess preclinical PA students' CR on a standardized patient assessment. Individual faculty graders and a panel of faculty graders evaluated student performance. Interrater reliability between individual faculty members and the faculty panel was assessed with Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The study participants included 88 PA students (n = 88) and 12 faculty evaluators (n = 12). The faculty panel changed 11 grades (12.5%) from individual faculty members. Cohen's kappa indicated substantial agreement (k = 0.698, [95% CI: 0.54-0.85]) between the individual faculty members' grades and the faculty panel's grades. CONCLUSIONS: The process of conducting a comparison of a checklist, the GRS, and a panel review improves the standardization of assessment and reduces grade inflation.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement , Physician Assistants , Clinical Competence , Clinical Reasoning , Humans , Physician Assistants/education , Reproducibility of Results
7.
J Asthma ; 59(11): 2305-2313, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34806541

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Both the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) asthma practice guidelines recommend that providers routinely check inhaler technique and correct any mistakes that patients may make when using these devices. Providers, however, rarely check inhaler technique during asthma visits. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the development of an instrument to measure self-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding inhaler technique patient education, (2) evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the new scales, and (3) provide preliminary evidence of construct validity. Methods: First- and second-year physician assistant (PA) students at two institutions completed an anonymous and voluntary survey evaluating two new instruments, the Teaching Inhalers to Patients: Self-efficacy (TIP-SE) and the Teaching Inhalers to Patients: Outcome Expectations (TIP-OE) scales and sociodemographic characteristics. The data were analyzed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA), Cronbach's α, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: We had usable responses from 146 PA students (71.9% participation rate). The PCA identified one factor for the TIP-SE and TIP-OE, respectively. The internal consistency of the TIP-SE and TIP-OE was α = 0.96 and α = 0.92, respectively. The logistic regression found that second-year PA students who had higher mean TIP-SE scores were significantly more likely to report teaching patients to use inhalers during rotations (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1, 2.9). There was not a statistically significant relationship between reporting teaching patients to use inhalers during rotations and mean TIP-OE scores. Conclusion: The TIP-SE and TIP-OE show preliminary evidence of reliability and validity.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2021.2008428 .


Subject(s)
Asthma , Administration, Inhalation , Asthma/drug therapy , Humans , Metered Dose Inhalers , Motivation , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Self Efficacy
8.
J Palliat Med ; 24(12): 1816-1822, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042524

ABSTRACT

Background: Physician Assistants (PAs) are increasingly likely to work in clinical areas where family conference skills are needed, but there is currently a lack of family conference education in PA program curricula. Objectives: To (1) describe a novel interprofessional education (IPE) event for PA students and chaplain residents; (2) examine whether participating in the IPE event is associated with improvements in attitudes and knowledge regarding interprofessional teams; and (3) describe participant perceptions about the event. Design: Two cohorts of PA students and chaplain residents completed a required interprofessional simulation activity involving a critically ill patient and a family conference. All participants completed pre- and postsimulation activity questionnaires. Bivariate tests were utilized to analyze the quantitative data. Setting/Subjects: Over two years, 171 PA students and 20 chaplain residents completed the activity at a school of medicine in the United States. Measurements: Pre- and postactivity measurements included role-specific questions plus overlapping sections regarding roles and responsibilities of the other discipline, comfort facilitating end-of-life discussions, and the value of IPE. Results: For PA students, there was a statistically significant increase for all questionnaire items. The largest effect size increases were in PA students' confidence in provider-patient communication at the end of life (Cohen's d > 1.1). Chaplain data demonstrated increases in knowledge of the PA role and likelihood of consulting with PAs in the future. Conclusion: This simulation event improved participant attitudes and knowledge relating to interprofessional interactions in the setting of an end-of-life family conference, and may contribute to more effective collaboration between PAs and chaplains in the clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Clergy , Physician Assistants , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Physician Assistants/education , Students
10.
JAAPA ; 30(11): 1, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29064944

Subject(s)
Hair , Humans , Poetry as Topic
11.
JAAPA ; 30(7): 52-54, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644225

ABSTRACT

Despite medical advances, pneumonia is a leading cause of death worldwide. Because inflammation is a key defense mechanism, adjuvant corticosteroid therapy has long been considered but never widely recommended to treat pneumonia. New research is exploring potential benefits of this therapy, including reduced time to clinical stability, reduced hospital stay, reduced rates of treatment failure, and prevention of complications.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...