ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Assess the impact on the quality of practices in a developing country (Lao Democratic People's Republic) of a long specialized course in anaesthesia (Certificate of Specialized Studies in Anesthesia-Intensive care and Emergency Medicine [Cesarmu]) versus accelerated trainings. POPULATION AND METHOD: Study concerned all surgical hospitals and all anaesthesiologists of Lao PDR. At hospital level, the quality of care was assessed and compared between hospitals with and without Cesarmu anaesthetists by using the quality of anaesthesia record and the spinal anaesthesia frequency in lower gyneco-obstetrical surgery. On an individual level, we assessed and compared anaesthetists who were Cesarmu trained and those who were not by using theoretical and practical scores. The latter were acquired by observing complete perisurgical care (pre-, per- and postoperative practical scores). RESULTS: We visited 29 of the 34 surgical hospitals in Lao PDR and met 90 of the 111 anesthesiologists. At hospital level, quality criteria were higher in the group of hospitals with Cesarmu anaesthesiologists without that difference being significant. On the other hand, all individual scores measured were significantly higher in the Cesarmu group. DISCUSSION: The improvement of practices resulting from training was obvious at the individual level but its impact at hospital level was not significant. There were most likely not enough trained anaesthetists to significantly influence practices in their departments. CONCLUSION: According to the criteria used, the impact of Cesarmu on the quality of anaesthesia in Lao PDR seems positive. However, training needs to be continued and practices homogenized.
