Immediate-early gene expression in the amygdala following footshock stress and contextual fear conditioning.

This study investigated the increase in expression in the amygdala of 2 immediate-early genes, c-fos and NGFI-A, following contextual fear conditioning. The immediate-shock freezing deficit paradigm was used to compare rats that received footshock after exploring a context to rats that received footshock immediately after placement in the chamber. The former procedure produces contextual fear conditioning while the latter does not. Rats were either handled (handled group), placed in a test chamber without receiving footshock (context-no-footshock group), received footshock immediately upon being placed in the chamber (immediate-footshock group), or received footshock after a 1 min delay (delayed-footshock group). Only the delayed-footshock group displayed a fear response (freezing behavior). Rats were sacrificed either 15 min after the experience or after a retention test 24 h later. The c-fos mRNA was increased in the medial nucleus of the amygdala in all of the groups that were placed in the test chamber. However, rats that received footshock (immediate- and delayed-footshock groups) had greater levels of c-fos mRNA expression than rats of the context-no-footshock group. The c-fos mRNA expression in the immediate- and delayed-footshock groups did not differ. However, after the retention test, the expression of c-fos mRNA in the medial nucleus of the amygdala did not differ between groups. In contrast to c-fos, NGFI-A mRNA expression in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala was greater in the delayed-footshock group than the handled and context-no-footshock groups 15 min after the footshock. This elevation in NGFI-A mRNA was not seen in the immediate-footshock group. This suggests that NGFI-A mRNA in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala may play a role in contextual fear conditioning.

Hyperexcitability: exaggerated fear-potentiated startle produced by partial amygdala kindling.

The present study asked whether partial amygdala kindling would affect the expression of conditioned fear-potentiated startle. Rats were conditioned to be fearful of a light. They were then stimulated bilaterally in the amygdala or hippocampus on 2 consecutive days (partial kindling). Rats were tested 24 hr later for fear-potentiated startle. Amygdala-kindled rats had exaggerated fear-potentiated startle compared to sham-kindled rats. Hippocampus-kindled rats also displayed fear-potentiated startle, but no greater than that of sham-kindled rats. Partial amygdala kindling induced c-fos messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, a marker for neuronal activation, throughout the limbic and neocortices. In contrast, partial hippocampus kindling induced c-fos mRNA in the hippocampus only. The data suggest that kindled-induced hyperexcitability of the amygdala and limbic cortices produced exaggerated conditioned fear-potentiated startle.

Electrical kindling is associated with increases in amygdala acetylcholine levels: an in vivo microdialysis study.

Using brain microdialysis, acetylcholine (Ach) levels were assessed in the nucleus amygdaloideus lateralis of electrically kindled rats using a cholinesterase inhibitor in the perfusion fluid to prevent Ach breakdown. During kindling development, when the animals displayed afterdischarges lasting more than 30 s but no seizures, a significant increase in Ach levels (+66%) was observed after electrical stimulation. Ach levels were also elevated after a stage 5 kindled seizure (+48%), with no additional increment compared to rats experiencing only afterdischarges. Chronic diazepam administration prevented kindling development and the increment in Ach overflow; however, diazepam itself (following acute administration) tended to decrease Ach levels in the amygdala. These findings are convergent with pharmacological data suggesting that changes in the cholinergic function may be important especially during amygdaloid kindling development.