Comparison of mid-term results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 20% or < 20.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment method in selected high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, data on which patients gain most benefit from this procedure is still limited. According to the European consensus document, TAVI is recommended for high-risk patients with logistic EuroSCORE (log ES) ≥ 20%. To date, little is known about TAVI outcomes in patients with log ES < 20%. AIM: To evaluate outcomes of TAVI in high-risk patients with log ES ≥ 20% in comparison with high-risk patients with log ES < 20%. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 93 patients who underwent TAVI at our institution between January 2009 and December 2011, we identified 59 (63.4%) patients with log ES ≥ 20% (Group 1) and 34 (36.6%) patients with log ES < 20% (Group 2). The mean log ES was 30.9 ± 9.7% in Group 1 and 12.7 ± 4.9% in Group 2 (p < 0.01). Significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to age (82.9 ± 5.9 vs. 78.7 ± 7.8 years, p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (51.5 ± 14% vs. 60.4 ± 9.6%, p = 0.002), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (56 ± 11 vs. 49 ± 10.6 mm Hg, p = 0.02), and glomerular filtration rate (51.3 ± 18.4 vs. 60.6 ± 16.6 mL/min/m2, p = 0.02). Survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 76.6% and 69.0% in Group 1 and 89.0% and 83.6% in Group 2 (p = NS). However, cardiovascular mortality at 1 and 2 years was higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (21.4% and 28.6% vs. 8.1% and 10.8% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that at 2 years of follow-up, TAVI in high-risk patients with log ES ≥ 20% was associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality compared to high-risk patients with log ES < 20%.

Lead extraction: The road to successful cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Still increasing life expectancy in patients with implanted devices and large number of leads more and more often induce the need to cure the treatment complications or to change especially to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In order to prevent further complications, the possibility of damaged or redundant leads extraction should be taken into consideration. The aim of the paper was to assess the effectiveness and safety of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with co-implantation of resynchronization systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2008 and March 2013, the system removal with TLE was conducted in 246 patients. In 38 patients (11 women, 28.9%), aged 43-79 (mean 65 years), it was combined with co-implantation of CRT-pacemaker or defibrillator (CRT-P/D). Indications for TLE covered: lead failure in 21 (55.3%) patients, redundant leads in 6 (15.8%), and the occluded venous system in 7 (18.4%). The up-grade of the pacemaker or defibrillator system to CRT-D was performed in 19 cases, CRT-P/D revision in next 19. Together 32 defibrillation leads and 42 pacing leads (27 left ventricular leads, and 1 epicardial lead) were implanted. The intended clinical target--an effective resynchronization therapy--was obtained in all patients. There was no case of death or severe complications. In 2 cases of venous occlusion, the implantation on the contralateral side was required. CONCLUSIONS: TLE enables effective resynchronization therapy also in the case of the presence of too many leads, occlusion of the venous system or lead failure. Significant technical problems can occur especially in patients with venous system occlusion.

Percutaneous Edwards SAPIEN(™) valve implantation for significant pulmonary regurgitation after previous surgical repair with a right ventricular outflow patch.

BACKGROUND: Current indications for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) are limited to patients who had their outflow tracts repaired with the use of a "full" condui-homograft. Patients after a patch repair are believed to have an unfavorable anatomy for PPVI. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a novel use of Edwards SAPIEN(TM) valve for percutaneous treatment of moderate and severe pulmonary regurgitation after tetralogy of Fallot (TF) repair with a right ventricular outflow (RVOT) patch. METHODS: PPVI was intended in 10 patients (age 21-39 years, 2 ♂) with regurgitant fraction of 30-59%, measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) 16-30 years after repair with a RVOT patch. Balloon test-inflations were used for definitive measurements and location of the landing site for the valve. All RVOTs were prestented. RESULTS: Successful valve implantation was achieved in nine patients. In one patient a bare-metal stent used for prestenting embolized into pulmonary artery. A 26-mm valve was implanted in seven and a 23-mm in two patients. CMRI at 1-2 month follow-up (n = 8) demonstrated both, sustained relief of pulmonary incompetence (regurgitant fraction = 0-14%) and significant decrease of the right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexes (from 169.9 ± 43.8 to 140.0 ± 40.3 ml/m(2) , P < 0.001). At that follow-up no adverse event occurred. No stent fractures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case series of patients with significant PR after a RVOT patch repair, successfully treated with a percutaneous Edwards SAPIEN(TM) valve implantation. The procedure is technically feasible and may be offered to patients with the outflow tracts larger than those limited by the Melody(®) system available currently.