Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 932, 2021 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34407800

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Doublet chemotherapy in combination with a biologic agent has been a standard of care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer for over a decade. The evidence for a "lighter" treatment approach is limited to mono-chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in the RAS unselected population. Anti-EGFR antibodies have activity as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer; however their role in first-line treatment in combination with 5-fluorouracil monotherapy or when given alone has not been well studied. MONARCC aims to investigate this approach in an elderly population. METHODS/DESIGN: MONARCC is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, non-comparative randomised phase II trial. Eligible patients aged ≥70 with unresectable metastatic, untreated, RAS/BRAF wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer will be randomised 1:1 to receive panitumumab alone or panitumumab plus infusional 5-fluorouracil. RAS and BRAF analyses will be performed in local laboratories. Comprehensive Health Assessment and Limited Health Assessments will be performed at baseline and at 16 weeks, respectively, to assess frailty. The Patient Symptom Questionnaire and Overall Treatment Utility are to be undertaken at different timepoints to assess the impact of treatment-related toxicities and quality of life. Treatment will be delivered every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity (as determined by treating clinician or patient), delay of treatment of more than 6 weeks, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point is 6-month progression-free survival in both arms. Secondary end points include overall survival, time to treatment failure, objective tumour response rate as defined by RECIST v1.1 and safety (adverse events). Tertiary and correlative endpoints include the feasibility and utility of a comprehensive geriatric assessment, quality of life and biological substudies. DISCUSSION: MONARCC investigates the activity and tolerability of first-line panitumumab-based treatments with a view to expand on current treatment options while maximising progression-free and overall survival and quality of life in molecularly selected elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000233224 , prospectively registered 14 February 2018.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , ras Proteins/genetics , Aged , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Metastasis , Panitumumab/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Heart ; 99(24): 1843-8, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23966030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abundant, indirect epidemiological evidence indicates that influenza contributes to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalisations with studies showing increases in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death during the influenza season. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether influenza is a significant and unrecognised underlying precipitant of AMI. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia, during 2008 to 2010. PATIENTS: Cases were inpatients with AMI and controls were outpatients without AMI at a hospital in Sydney, Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was laboratory evidence of influenza. Secondary outcome was baseline self-reported acute respiratory tract infection. RESULTS: Of 559 participants, 34/275 (12.4%) cases and 19/284 (6.7%) controls had influenza (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.54); half were vaccinated. None were recognised as having influenza during their clinical encounter. After adjustment, influenza infection was no longer a significant predictor of recent AMI. However, influenza vaccination was significantly protective (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.85), with a vaccine effectiveness of 45% (95% CI 15% to 65%). CONCLUSIONS: Recent influenza infection was an unrecognised comorbidity in almost 10% of hospital patients. Influenza did not predict AMI, but vaccination was significantly protective but underused. The potential population health impact of influenza vaccination, particularly in the age group 50-64 years, who are at risk for AMI but not targeted for vaccination, should be further explored. Our data should inform vaccination policy and cardiologists should be aware of missed opportunities to vaccinate individuals with ischaemic heart disease against influenza.


Subject(s)
Influenza A virus/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/complications , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Vaccination , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , New South Wales/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...