Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-732604

ABSTRACT

Introduction: As pharmacological treatment of hypertensionhas become a burden worldwide, the study looked into nonpharmacological ways of reducing blood pressure. Theobjective was to determine if music guided, slow and deepbreathing will reduce the blood pressure among patientswith hypertension in eight weeks.Methods: A participant blinded, multi-centre, randomisedcontrolled trial was conducted in which the participants inthe intervention group (IG) practiced deep breathingexercise guided by sound cues and those in the controlgroup (CG) listened to the music. The primary end point wasreduction in blood pressure at eight weeks.Results: 87 patients, 46 males and 41 females with mean ageof 61.1 years were recruited and 93.1% of them successfullycompleted the study. There was significant reduction insystolic and diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline by 8weeks in both groups. The reduction in Mean systolic bloodpressure (SBP) in the control arm was 10.5mmHg comparedto 8.3mmHg (p<0.001) in intervention group. Diastolic bloodpressure (DBP) reduction in control and intervention groupswere 5.2 mmHg (p<0.001) and 5.6 mmHg (p<0.001)respectively. The absolute difference in SBP reduction frombaseline in IG & CG was -2.2 (95%CI: -7.8 to 3.5) and DBPwas -0.4 (95%CI: -2.9 to 3.6). However, blood pressurereduction between the two groups was not significant.Conclusions: Both listening to music and deep breathingexercise were associated with a clinically significantreduction in SBP and DBP. However, deep breathingexercise did not augment the benefit of music in reducingBP.

2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD007485, 2015 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26508087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Maternal antenatal transfers provide better neonatal outcomes. However, there will inevitably be some infants who require acute transport to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Because of this, many institutions develop services to provide neonatal transport by specially trained health personnel. However, few studies report on relevant clinical outcomes in infants requiring transport to NICU. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of specialist transport teams compared with non-specialist transport teams on the risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity among high-risk newborn infants requiring transport to neonatal intensive care. SEARCH METHODS: We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 July 2015), EMBASE (1980 to 31 July 2015), CINAHL (1982 to 31 July 2015), conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. STUDY DESIGN: randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster randomised controlled trials. POPULATION: neonates requiring transport to a neonatal intensive care unit. INTERVENTION: transport by a specialist team compared to a non-specialist team. OUTCOMES: any of the following outcomes - death; adverse events during transport leading to respiratory compromise; and condition on admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the information provided in the studies and by personal communication with the author. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size estimated and reported as risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) or number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Data from cluster randomised trials were not combined for analysis. MAIN RESULTS: One trial met the inclusion criteria of this review but was considered ineligible owing to serious bias in the reporting of the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no reliable evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the effects of specialist neonatal transport teams for neonatal retrieval on infant morbidity and mortality. Cluster randomised trial study designs may be best suited to provide us with answers on effectiveness and clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Specialization , Transportation of Patients/organization & administration , Humans , Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (9): CD008136, 2015 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26346107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symphysis fundal height (SFH) measurement is commonly practiced primarily to detect fetal intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Undiagnosed IUGR may lead to fetal death as well as increase perinatal mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to compare SFH measurement with serial ultrasound measurement of fetal parameters or clinical palpation to detect abnormal fetal growth (IUGR and large-for-gestational age), and improving perinatal outcome. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (14 July 2015) and reference lists of retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials including quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials involving pregnant women with singleton fetuses at 20 weeks' gestation and above comparing tape measurement of SFH with serial ultrasound measurement of fetal parameters or clinical palpation using anatomical landmarks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: One trial involving 1639 women was included. It compared SFH measurement with clinical abdominal palpation.There was no difference in the two reported primary outcomes of incidence of small-for-gestational age (risk ratio (RR) 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.90, low quality evidence) or perinatal death.(RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 4.07; participants = 1639, low quality evidence). There were no data on the neonatal detection of large-for-gestational age (variously defined by authors). There was no difference in the reported secondary outcomes of neonatal hypoglycaemia, admission to neonatal nursery, admission to the neonatal nursery for IUGR (low quality evidence), induction of labour and caesarean section (very low quality evidence). The trial did not address the other outcomes specified in the 'Summary of findings' table (intrauterine death; neurodevelopmental outcome in childhood). GRADEpro software was used to assess the quality of evidence, downgrading of evidence was based on including a small single study with unclear risk of bias and a wide confidence interval crossing the line of no effect. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether SFH measurement is effective in detecting IUGR. We cannot therefore recommended any change of current practice. Further trials are needed.


Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnosis , Palpation/methods , Pubic Symphysis/anatomy & histology , Uterus/anatomy & histology , Abdomen , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
4.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-630489

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Conventional Chest Physiotherapy (CCPT) remains the mainstay of treatment for sputum mobilization in patients with productive cough such as bronchiectasis and “Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease” (COPD). However CCPT is time consuming requires the assistance of a physiotherapist and limits the independence of the patient. Mechanical percussors which are electrical devices used to provide percussion to the external chest wall might provide autonomy and greater compliance. We compared safety and efficacy of a mechanical chest percusser devised by Formedic Technology with conventional chest percussion. Methods: Twenty patients (mean age 64years) were randomly assigned to receive either CCPT or mechanical percussor on the first day and crossed over by “Latin square randomisation” to alternative treatment for 6 consecutive days and the amount of sputum expectorated was compared by dry and wet weight. Adverse events and willingness to use was assessed by a home diary and a questionnaire. Results: There were 13 males and 7 females, eight diagnosed as bronchiectasis and 12 COPD. The mean dry weight of sputum induced by CCPT (0.54g + 0.32) was significantly more compared with MP (0.40g + 0.11); p-value = 0.002. The mean wet weight of sputum with CCPT (10.71g + 8.70) was also significantly more compared with MP (5.99g + 4.5); p-value < 0.001. There were no significant difference in adverse events and majority of patients were willing to use the device by themselves. Conclusion: The mechanical percussor although produces less sputum is well tolerated and can be a useful adjunct to CCPT

5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (7): CD008136, 2012 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22786513

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symphysis fundal height (SFH) measurement is commonly practiced primarily to detect fetal intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Undiagnosed IUGR may lead to fetal death as well as increase perinatal mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to compare SFH measurement with serial ultrasound measurement of fetal parameters or clinical palpation to detect abnormal fetal growth (IUGR and large-for-gestational age), and improving perinatal outcome. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (20 January 2012) and reference lists of retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials including quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials involving pregnant women with singleton fetuses at 20 weeks' gestation and above comparing tape measurement of SFH with serial ultrasound measurement of fetal parameters or clinical palpation using anatomical landmarks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, trial quality and extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: One trial involving 1639 women was included. It compared SFH measurement with clinical abdominal palpation.There was no difference in the two reported primary outcomes of incidence of small-for-gestational age (risk ratio (RR) 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.90) or perinatal death. There was no difference in the reported secondary outcomes of neonatal hypoglycaemia, admission to neonatal nursery, admission to the neonatal nursery for IUGR, induction of labour and caesarean section. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether SFH measurement is effective in detecting IUGR. We cannot therefore recommended any change of current practice. Further trials are needed.


Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnosis , Palpation/methods , Pubic Symphysis/anatomy & histology , Uterus/anatomy & histology , Abdomen , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...