The effect of exercise and physical activity-interventions on step count and intensity level in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Reduced physical activity is a worldwide challenge in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify devise-measured effects of physical activity, exercise and physiotherapy-interventions on step count and intensity level of physical activity in individuals with MS. Methods: A systematic search of the databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, CINHAL and Web of Science was carried out to retrieve studies published in the English language from the inception to the first of May 2023. All trials concerning the effectiveness of different types of exercise on step count and intensity level in people with MS were included. The quality of the included studies and their risk of bias were critically appraised using The modified consolidated standards of reporting trials and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI of the step-count outcome and moderate to vigorous intensity level before versus after treatment were estimated in both Intervention and Control groups using the random effect model. The Harbord test were used to account for heterogeneity between studies and assess publication bias, respectively. Further sensitivity analysis helped with the verification of the reliability and stability of our review results. Results: A total of 8 randomized clinical trials (involving 919 individuals with MS) were included. The participants (including 715 (77.8%) female and 204 (22.2%) male) had been randomly assigned to the Intervention (n = 493) or Control group (n = 426). The pooled mean (95% CI) age and BMI of participants were 49.4 years (95% CI: 47.4, 51.4 years) and 27.7 kg/m2 (95% CI: 26.4, 29 kg/m2), respectively. In terms of the comparison within the Intervention and the Control groups before and after the intervention, the results of the meta-analysis indicate that the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for step-count in the Intervention group was 0.56 (95% CI: -0.42, 1.54), while in the Control group it was 0.12 (95% CI: -0.05, 0.28). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the pooled SMD of step-count in the physical activity Intervention group compared to the Controls after the intervention (pooled standard mean difference = 0.19, 95% CI: -0.36,0.74). Subgroup analysis on moderate to vigorous intensity level of physical activity revealed no significant effect of the physical activity intervention in the Intervention group compared to the Control group after the intervention, or within groups before and after the intervention. Results of meta regression showed that age, BMI, duration of disease and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were not the potential sources of heterogeneity (all p > 0.05). Data on the potential harms of the interventions were limited. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed no significant differences in step count and moderate to vigorous physical activity level among individuals with MS, both within and between groups receiving physical activity interventions. More studies that objectively measure physical activity are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022343621.

The precarity of patient participation - a qualitative interview study of experiences from the acute stroke and rehabilitation journey.

INTRODUCTION: Active patient participation is an important factor in optimizing post-stroke recovery, yet it is often low, regardless of stroke severity. The reasons behind this trend are unclear. PURPOSE: To explore how people who have suffered a stroke, perceive the transition from independence to dependence and whether their role in post-stroke rehabilitation influences active participation. METHODS: In-depth interviews with 17 people who have had a stroke. Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation informed by the concept of autonomy from enactive theory. RESULTS: Two categories emerged. The first captures how the stroke and the resultant hospital admission produces a shift from being an autonomous subject to "an object on an assembly line." Protocol-based investigations, inactivity, and a lack of patient involvement predominantly determine the hospital context. The second category illuminates how people who have survived a stroke passively adapt to the hospital system, a behavior that stands in contrast to the participatory enablement facilitated by community. Patients feel more prepared for the transition home after in-patient rehabilitation rather than following direct discharge from hospital. CONCLUSION: Bodily changes, the traditional patient role, and the hospital context collectively exacerbate a reduction of individual autonomy. Thus, an interactive partnership between people who survived a stroke and multidisciplinary professionals may strengthen autonomy and promote participation after a stroke.

Effect of innovative vs. usual care physical therapy in subacute rehabilitation after stroke. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Background: Research on stroke rehabilitation often addresses common difficulties such as gait, balance or physical activity separately, a fragmentation contrasting the complexity in clinical practice. Interventions aiming for recovery are needed. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of a comprehensive low-cost physical therapy intervention, I-CoreDIST, vs. usual care on postural control, balance, physical activity, gait and health related quality of life during the first 12 weeks post-stroke. Methods: This prospective, assessor-masked randomized controlled trial included 60 participants from two stroke units in Norway. Participants, who were randomized to I-CoreDIST (n = 29) or usual care physical therapy (n = 31), received 5 sessions/week when in-patients or 3 sessions/week as out-patients. Primary outcomes were the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version (TISmodNV) and activity monitoring (ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT). Secondary outcomes were the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, MiniBesTEST, 10-meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, force-platform measurements and EQ5D-3L. Stroke specific quality of life scale was administered at 12 weeks. Linear regression and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Five participants were excluded and seven lost to follow-up, leaving 48 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. There were no significant between-group effects for primary outcomes: TIS-modNV (p = 0,857); daily average minutes of sedative (p = 0.662), light (p = 0.544) or moderate activity (p = 0.239) and steps (p = 0.288), or secondary outcomes at 12 weeks except for significant improvements on EQ5D-3L in the usual care group. Within-group changes were significant for all outcomes in both groups except for activity levels that were low, EQ5D-3L favoring the usual care group, and force-platform data favoring the intervention group. Conclusions: Physical therapy treatment with I-CoreDIST improved postural control, balance, physical activity and gait during the first 12 weeks after a stroke but is not superior to usual care.

Embodiment, tailoring, and trust are important for co-construction of meaning in physiotherapy after stroke: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physiotherapy, with an emphasis on high intensity, individually tailored, and person-centered treatment, is an effective route for recovery after a stroke. No single approach, however, has been deemed paramount, and there is limited knowledge about the patient experience of assessment, goal-setting, and treatment in physiotherapy. In this study, we seek to report patient experiences of I-CoreDIST-a new physiotherapy intervention that targets recovery-and those of usual care. The purpose is to investigate how individuals with stroke experience the bodily and interactive course of physiotherapy during their recovery process. METHODS: A qualitative study, nested within a randomized controlled trial, consisting of in-depth interviews with 19 stroke survivors who received either I-CoreDIST or usual care. Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation, and this analysis was informed by enactive theory. RESULTS: Interaction with the physiotherapist, which was guided by perceived bodily changes, fluctuated between being, on the one hand, formal/explicit and, on the other, tacit/implicit. The experiences of participants in the intervention group and the usual care group differed predominantly with regards to the content of therapy sessions and the means of measuring progress; divergences in levels of satisfaction with the treatment were less pronounced. The perception of positive bodily changes, as well as the tailoring of difficulty and intensity, were common and essential features in generating meaning and motivation. An embodied approach seemed to facilitate sense-making in therapy situations. In the interaction between the participants and their physiotherapists, trust and engagement were important but also multifaceted, involving both interpersonal skills and professional expertise. CONCLUSION: The embodied nature of physiotherapy practice is a source for sense-making and meaning-construction for patients after a stroke. Trust in the physiotherapist, along with emotional support, is considered essential. Experiencing progress and individualizing approaches are decisive motivators.

Embodiment and self in reorientation to everyday life following severe traumatic brain injury.

People with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) are often young and need long-term follow-up as many suffer complex motor, sensory, perceptual and cognitive impairments. This paper aims to introduce phenomenological notions of embodiment and self as a framework to help understand how people with sTBI experience reorientation to everyday life, and to inform clinical practice in neurological physiotherapy. The impairments caused by the sTBI may lead to a sense of alienation of one's own body and changes in operative intentionality and in turn disrupt the reorganization of self, identity, everyday life and integration/co-construction of meaning with others. Applying a first-person conception of the body may extend insights into the importance of an adapted and individualized approach to strengthen the sensory, perceptual and motor body functions, which underpin the pre-reflective and reflective aspects of the self. It seems important to integrate these aspects, while also paying attention to optimizing co-construction of meaning for the person with sTBI in the treatment context. This requires understanding the patient as an experiencing and expressive body, a lived body (body-as-subject) and not just the body-as-object as is favored in more traditional frameworks of physiotherapy.