Patterns and distribution of isolated calf deep vein thrombosis.

PURPOSE: In the search for calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with color-flow duplex scanning (CFDS), most vascular laboratories investigate only the posterior tibial and peroneal veins. Few laboratories assess the soleal and gastrocnemial veins. This study was designed to determine the patterns and distribution of isolated calf DVT, including the soleal and gastrocnemial veins. METHODS: In the last 3 years, 5250 patients (mean age, 66 +/- 15 years; range, 22 to 93 years) were referred to the vascular laboratory for clinical suspicion of DVT and underwent examination with CFDS. All superficial and deep named veins, excluding the anterior tibial from groin to ankle, were imaged. Of the deep veins in the calf, the peroneal, the posterior tibial, the gastrocnemial, and the soleal veins were examined throughout their length. RESULTS: DVT was detected in 14% of the patients. Isolated calf DVT was detected in 282 limbs of 251 patients (4.8%). No significant difference was noted for the sex (114 men vs 137 women; P =.15) or the limb preference (145 left vs 137 right; P =.5). The peroneal veins were most frequently involved, with 115 limbs (41%) affected. The soleal veins were involved in 109 limbs (39%), followed by the posterior tibial in 105 limbs (37%) and the gastrocnemial in 79 limbs (29%). Thrombus in the soleal vein alone was found in 57 limbs (20%), in the gastrocnemial in 48 limbs (17%), in the peroneal in 41 limbs (15%), and in the posterior tibial vein in 35 limbs (12%). Thrombus confined to a single or paired vein was found in 181 limbs (64%). Thrombus involving two different veins (27%) was the second most frequent pattern, and thrombus in three (7%) or four (1.4%) different veins was less prevalent. Isolated thrombosis in veins not routinely investigated was found in 113 limbs (40%; soleal, n = 57; gastrocnemial, n = 48; soleal + gastrocnemial, n = 8). Multifocal origin of thrombosis, defined as thrombi in two different veins that do not anatomically communicate, was identified in 63 limbs (22%). CONCLUSION: Forty percent of the patients with acute isolated calf DVT would be judged to have normal CFDS examination results if the muscular veins in the calf were not imaged. Multifocal origin of thrombosis was found in 22% of the involved limbs. The prevalence of thrombosis in any calf vein either alone or in combination is comparable. Accordingly, the soleal and gastrocnemial veins should be examined routinely.

Laboratory assays and duplex scanning outcomes after symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: preliminary results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to assess a number of hematologic and fibrinolytic assays at the time of diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and at several intervals over a period of 6 months afterward and to correlate these results with the results of serial duplex scanning. METHODS: Thirty-five patients (average age 61, range 18 to 82) with acute symptomatic DVT confirmed by duplex scanning were included. On diagnosis, blood was drawn, and plasma levels of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), D-dimer (DD), and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) were determined. Duplex scanning and all laboratory assays were repeated 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: The rate of DVT complete resolution 6 months after diagnosis was 57%. Whereas plasma levels of PAI were similar throughout the 6-month follow-up period, t-PA increased significantly 1 week after diagnosis and decreased thereafter. Both DD and TFPI levels decreased significantly after diagnosis compared with presentation values. Comparing these assay levels between patients with complete resolution versus partial or no resolution, PAI levels were significantly higher during the first week in patients with poor outcome. Plasma levels of t-PA were higher in cases with good outcome, and DD levels were higher in patients with poor outcome. TFPI levels were similar in both outcome groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with complete DVT resolution on duplex scanning at 6 months had significantly lower levels of PAI on presentation and after 1 week than did those with incomplete lysis. Although differences were not significant, t-PA levels were higher and DD lower in patients with good outcome. Our results suggest that certain plasma fibrinolytic assays might correlate with the outcome of DVT, as assessed by duplex ultrasonography.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in North America: results of a survey among general surgeons.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze current attitudes toward the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism among North American general surgeons. METHODS: A survey regarding awareness of the problem of venous thromboembolism and preferred modalities of prophylaxis was sent to 3500 randomly selected Fellows of the American College of Surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 1018 (29.1%) surveys was returned. Most of the responding surgeons consider venous thromboembolism a serious health problem. Ninety percent of the surgeons use prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism routinely. The most frequently used modalities are intermittent pneumatic compression, low-dose heparin, and elastic stocking. A combination of physical and pharmacologic methods is used by one fourth of respondents, and only 50% start pharmacologic prophylaxis before the surgical procedure. The thrombosis risk factors that are most frequently considered by surgeons when deciding about using prophylaxis are history of venous thromboembolism, immobility, and length of operation. CONCLUSIONS: North American surgeons who responded to this survey are well aware of the problem of venous thromboembolism and their approach to prevention has been significantly modified in the last 10 years. Compared with similar European surveys this survey reveals a higher implementations of physical methods such as intermittent pneumatic compression and elastic stockings. Because of the limited response rate and possibility of sampling bias, these findings should be interpreted with caution.