Chlorine in breath condensate--a measure of airway affection in pollinosis?

BACKGROUND: Infiltration of inflammatory cells in bronchial mucosa and glandular hypersecretion are hallmarks of asthma. It has been postulated that exhaled breath condensate (EBC) mirrors events in epithelial lining fluid of airways, such as presence of local inflammation as well as glandular hypersecretion. It is also well known that eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LT) are released by circulating inflammatory cells when triggered by antigen stimulation in asthma patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether chlorine and/or cys-LT in EBC would reflect changes of exposure of airborne pollen in patients with asthma. METHODS: EBC and serum were collected from 23 patients with allergic asthma during a pollen season and repeated 5 months later during a period with no aeroallergens. Chlorine was measured by means of a sensitive coulometric technique and cys-LT by an EIA technique. Serum ECP was measured and lung function tests were performed and symptoms noted during both occasions. RESULTS: Significantly higher concentrations of chlorine in EBC (p = 0.007) and ECP in serum (p = 0.003) were found during the pollen season compared to post-season. Chlorine levels tended to be higher in patients who reported of chest symptoms compared to those who denied symptoms during the pollen season (p = 0.06). Areas under the receiver-operated characteristic curves (AUC(ROC)) were compared and similar discriminative power to identify exacerbations of asthma was recorded by chlorine in EBC (range 0.67-0.78) and ECP in serum (range 0.64-0.78). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that chlorine in EBC and ECP in serum decreased significantly post-season, and this is suggested to mirror the decrement in airborne antigen. It is furthermore proposed that chlorine in EBC and ECP in serum tend to have a similar capacity to identify seasonal variations in airborne pollen in patients with asthma.

Single-isomer R-salbutamol is not superior to racemate regarding protection for bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Bronchial hyper-reactivity (BHR) has been suggested to follow cessation of regular medication with racemic salbutamol. This study aimed at investigating the effects from medication with R,S- and R-salbutamol on bronchial response to provocation with isocapnic hyperventilation of cold air (IHCA). Twenty-six patients with mild to moderate asthma were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, cross-over study. Bronchial response to provocation was measured before and after 1 week's medication. Doses of 0.63 mg R-salbutamol or 1.25 mg R/S-salbutamol were inhaled three times daily during medication-weeks and a wash-out week intervened. Tests were performed 6 h after the last dose of test drug. Impulse oscillometry and forced expiratory volume during one second were methods used to identify bronchial response to provocation. Two patients withdrew from the investigation due to side-effects, one from R- the other from R,S-salbutamol. Comparable resting bronchial conditions were indicated by differences in baseline lung function values of <2% between study days. No statistically significant medication-dependent differences in BHR could be demonstrated between treatment groups. However, 15 patients exhibited higher (P = 0.03) post-treatment BHR after pure R-salbutamol than after R,S-salbutamol. Furthermore, plasma concentrations of R-salbutamol tended to be lower (P = 0.08) after medication with R- than after R,S-salbutamol despite equal doses of R-salbutamol given during the two separate treatment periods. We also found that considerable amounts of S-salbutamol were retrieved in plasma after medication with pure R-salbutamol. We conclude that we were unable to demonstrate favourable effects of R-salbutamol over R,S-salbutamol regarding response to provocation with IHCA after regular medication of 1 week's duration.

Decreased serum levels of P-selectin and eosinophil cationic protein in patients with mild asthma after inhaled salbutamol.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways associated with selective recruitment of activated eosinophils. P-selectin, a cell adhesion molecule, may be an important controller of the inflammation by mediating selective eosinophil cell influx to the lung. Serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) have been used as a marker of eosinophil inflammation, and indirectly as a marker of disease activity of asthma. ECP levels may not be elevated in some patients with asthma, and this fact prompted us to search for additional surrogate markers for monitoring disease activity in asthma. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether repeated inhalations of salbutamol, a beta-2-receptor agonist used for bronchodilation, would lead to reduced serum levels of P-selectin and/or ECP. METHODS: Fourteen patients with asymptomatic mild stable asthma were enrolled into a randomised crossover study. Salbutamol was inhaled three times every 3 h. Blood was sampled 4 h after the last inhalation. Nine non-treated healthy volunteers served as control subjects. Serum ECP and P-selectin levels were measured using radioimmunoassay and ELISA, respectively. RESULTS: P-selectin and ECP levels in serum obtained from asymptomatic asthmatics were close to those of the volunteers, and inter-day variability tended to be lower for levels of P-selectin than for ECP. Significant decreases of P-selectin (p = 0.01) and ECP (p = 0.03) were recorded after salbutamol inhalation. There was no association between the changes in ECP and P-selectin levels in serum. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that decreases in P-selectin and ECP may have different kinetics, suggesting different pathways of action of salbutamol. We judge that P-selectin may be used as a sensitive marker in mild asthma.

Preserved bronchial dilatation after salbutamol does not guarantee protection against bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Racemic salbutamol, a beta2-adrenoceptor agonist used for dilatation of airways, has recently been shown to induce lessened relaxation of bronchial smooth muscle and partial loss of bronchoprotection, seen as increased hyperresponsiveness, after regular treatment. The racemate undergoes stereo-selective disposition, giving higher plasma levels of S-salbutamol than that of bronchodilating R-salbutamol, thus raising S : R ratios after repeated administration. Our aim was to evaluate whether increased bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) could be found even after 1 day of repeated salbutamol inhalations, with beta2-receptor-induced bronchial smooth muscle relaxation remaining and whether this would be associated with plasma levels of either enantiomer. Fifteen patients with stable asthma, aged 19-54 years, were included in a randomized, cross-over study. An indirect bronchial challenge method was used [voluntary isocapnic hyperventilation of cold air (IHCA)], and airway condition tested by means of impulse oscillometry. Racemic salbutamol was inhaled three times during a 6-h period. IHCA was performed and plasma concentrations of enantiomers were measured 4 h after the last dose. Tests were also performed without preceding drug treatment. beta2-Agonist-produced bronchial dilatation and protection persisted in the majority of the 15 patients 4 h after repeated inhalations of salbutamol during 1 day. In only two of the 15 patients we could trace increased BHR after salbutamol. Neither dilatation nor protection could be linked to plasma levels of either R- or S-salbutamol. The underlying mechanisms of BHR remain unknown and are dissociated from beta2-receptor-mediated dilatation.