Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 29(8): 869-880, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32551999

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with TP53 dysfunction, assessed by del(17p) or TP53 mutations, respond poorly to chemo-immunotherapy and fare better with the new therapies (BCR and BCL-2 inhibitors); however, it is unclear whether their response is similar to that of patients without anomalies or whether there is currently an adequate determination of TP53 dysfunction. AREA COVERED: A literature search was undertaken on clinical trials and real-world experience data on patients with TP53 dysfunction treated with different protocols. Moreover, data on the TP53 biological function and on the tests currently employed for its assessment were reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Although TP53 dysfunction has less negative influence on the new biological therapies, patients with these alterations, particularly those with biallelic inactivation of TP53, have a worst outcome with these therapies than those without alterations. At present, a determination of TP53, particularly with next generation sequencing (NGS) methodologies, may be sufficient for the identifications of the patients unsuitable for chemo-immunotherapy, although integration with del(17p) would be advisable. For the future, more extensive determinations of the TP53 status, including functional assays, may become part of the current armamentarium for a better patient stratification and treatment with newer protocols.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/pathology , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/antagonists & inhibitors
2.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(1): 29-38, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31738609

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Regimens involving intensive immuno-chemotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant represent the standard treatment for younger fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Targeted approaches (i.e. ibrutinib, bortezomib, and lenalidomide) represent the backbone of therapy for relapsed cases.Areas covered: Acalabrutinib is a novel small molecule with a butynamide moiety specifically designed to irreversibly inhibit Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), which is more potent and selective than ibrutinib. Relevant publications have been identified through literature searches using the terms 'mantle cell lymphoma' and 'acalabrutinib'.Expert opinion: Acalabrutinib has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MCL patients. To date, clinical trials have reported some adverse effects such as cardiac toxicity or atrial fibrillation. Acalabrutinib in combination with other drugs, either in chemo-containing or chemo-free schedules, represent a valid option for MCL. However, none of the treatment schedules containing BTK inhibitors have been shown to be curative in MCL. Acalabrutinib may ultimately represent an option for patients who are 'fit' and exhibit well-controlled disease, which often characterizes only a limited 'niche' among MCL patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzamides/administration & dosage , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Humans , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
3.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 20(5): 487-494, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although a variety of therapeutic schemes for Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) have been attempted, the clinical outcome of patients continues to be unsatisfactory especially among patients with a very high-risk profile and in the relapsed/refractory setting. For this reason, recent clinical trials have explored novel approaches, either by the use of biological agents in chemotherapy-free schedules or by integrating them with chemoimmunotherapy regimens. Areas covered: The efficacy of lenalidomide monotherapy and combination therapy established in clinical studies mainly involving relapsed/refractory MCL is reviewed. The mechanism of action of lenalidomide is also discussed. Furthermore, the current position of lenalidomide in the MCL treatment algorithm is debated. Expert opinion: Lenalidomide demonstrated high efficacy and tolerability in several clinical trials as well as in retrospective real-world reports, even in patients who relapsed or were resistant to bortezomib and ibrutinib. In 2013, lenalidomide was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for relapsed/refractory MCL after two prior therapies including at least one prior treatment with bortezomib. However, the potential synergistic anti-neoplastic effects of lenalidomide in combination with other biological agents, i.e. ibrutinib and venetoclax, especially in the management of p53-mutated cases, still remain an open issue.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Humans , Piperidines , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...