Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 27(4): 284-90, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26082461

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a quality of care instrument that is grounded in the service user perspective and validate it in a mental health service. DESIGN: The instrument (SEQUenCE (SErvice user QUality of CarE)) was developed through analysis of focus group data and clinical practice guidelines, and refined through field-testing and psychometric analyses. SETTING: All participants were attending an independent mental health service in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Participants had a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder (BPAD) or a psychotic disorder. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-nine service users participated in six focus group interviews. Seventy-one service users participated in field-testing: 10 judged the face validity of an initial 61-item instrument; 28 completed a revised 52-item instrument from which 12 items were removed following test-retest and convergent validity analyses; 33 completed the resulting 40-item instrument. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test-retest reliability, internal consistency and convergent validity of the instrument. RESULTS: The final instrument showed acceptable test-retest reliability at 5-7 days (r = 0.65; P < 0.001), good convergent validity with the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale (r = 0.84, P < 0.001) and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: SEQUenCE is a valid, reliable scale that is grounded in the service user perspective and suitable for routine use. It may serve as a useful tool in individual care planning, service evaluation and research. The instrument was developed and validated with service users with a diagnosis of either BPAD or a psychotic disorder; it does not yet have established external validity for other diagnostic groups.


Subject(s)
Mental Health Services/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Ireland , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
2.
Qual Health Res ; 23(12): 1672-85, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24163347

ABSTRACT

According to the recovery model of mental health care, service development should incorporate the expert knowledge of service users. To date, there has been limited research into conceptualizations of mental health care quality among services users diagnosed with bipolar disorder or psychosis. To investigate service user perspectives on quality of care, we conducted six focus groups (N = 29) with inpatients and outpatients of an independent Irish mental health service. We undertook an inductive thematic analysis of the data. Participants identified proactive staff, meaningful and warm staff-patient interactions, and safety and sociability in the inpatient environment as components of good quality mental health care. Participants also discussed how the implementation of best practice guidelines does not necessarily improve quality of care from the service user perspective. This and similar qualitative research should be used to inform service development and the creation of evaluation instruments compatible with the recovery model.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Patient Satisfaction , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Adult , Aged , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Ireland , Male , Mental Health Services , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...